Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix
Date
Msg-id 25692.986491873@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> I just committed some changes so that ecpg does acceptt "long long"
> variables all the time, but repleces them with type "long" if
> HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 is not defined.

This looks like a workable strategy for now.  Ten years from now, when
"long" means 64 bits everywhere and people are starting to use "long long"
to mean 128 bits, we'll have to revisit it ;-)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: Re: TODO list
Next
From: "Ken Hirsch"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: TODO list