Int64 (long long) Supporting Compiler Requirement Status? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Butler
Subject Int64 (long long) Supporting Compiler Requirement Status?
Date
Msg-id 3ADA3F1C.80767046@middle.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Int64 (long long) Supporting Compiler Requirement Status?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
There was a discussion once about using 64 bit long long compiler support to
increase the size of the transaction ids to solve the wrap around problem. I
understand that there is a different solution for this now.

However, my question is:  Are we to the point where int64's can be used in
mainstream code yet, or are there supported platforms that this will not work
with?  And if not, when (if ever) will such capability be standardized?

The reason why I ask is I would like to experiment with a variable length
base-(2^32) numeric type that I hope might be accepted someday, and
base-(2^32) operations need long long support to implement in a
straightforward fashion.

-  Mark Butler


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Butler
Date:
Subject: Re: NUMERIC type benchmarks - CORRECTED
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: NUMERIC type benchmarks - CORRECTED