Re: Strange behaviour of to_date() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mario Weilguni
Subject Re: Strange behaviour of to_date()
Date
Msg-id 01041818125000.00700@wotan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Strange behaviour of to_date()  (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am Mittwoch, 18. April 2001 10:47 schrieben Sie:
(...)
>
>  Yes, Oracle support using not exact format mask, but Oracle's to_date
> is very based on date/time and not support others things:
>
> SVRMGR> select to_date('333.222.4.1.2001', '333.222.FMdd.FMmm.yyyy') from
> dual;
> TO_DATE('
> ---------
> ORA-01821: date format not recognized
>
>
> test=# select to_date('333.222.4.1.2001', '333.222.FMdd.FMmm.yyyy');
>   to_date
> ------------
>  2001-01-04
> (1 row)
>
> or nice:
>
> test=# select to_date('33304333.1.2001', '333dd333.FMmm.yyyy');
>   to_date
> ------------
>  2001-01-04
> (1 row)

Maybe it's not designed for my needs, but that does not change the fact that 
it's a bug. When the mask is not exact, it should raise an error, and not 
silently return WRONG values, which is really bad behaviour, and will result 
in "lost" data.


-- 
===================================================Mario Weilguni                               KPNQwest Austria GmbH
 Senior Engineer Web Solutions                         Nikolaiplatz 4
 tel: +43-316-813824                                8020 graz, austria
 fax: +43-316-813824-26                    http://www.kpnqwest.at
 e-mail: mario.weilguni@kpnqwest.com
===================================================


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUG?] tgconstrrelid doesn't survive a dump/restore
Next
From: "P. A. Bagyenda"
Date:
Subject: Corrupt database log??