tables/indexes/logs on different volumes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
Subject tables/indexes/logs on different volumes
Date
Msg-id 20010425132545.C1692@store.zembu.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: refusing connections based on load ...  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:41:57AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Nathan Myers wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:28:17PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > > I have a Dual-866, 1gig of RAM and strip'd file systems ... this past
> > > week, I've hit many times where CPU usage is 100%, RAM is 500Meg free
> > > and disks are pretty much sitting idle ...
> >
> > Assuming "strip'd" above means "striped", it strikes me that you
> > might be much better off operating the drives independently, with
> > the various tables, indexes, and logs scattered each entirely on one
> > drive.
> 
> have you ever tried to maintain a database doing this?  PgSQL is
> definitely not designed for this sort of setup, I had symlinks going
> everywhere, and with the new numbering schema, this is even more 
> difficult to try and do :)

Clearly you need to build a tool to organize it.  It would help a lot if 
PG itself could provide some basic assistance, such as calling a stored
procedure to generate the pathname of the file.

Has there been any discussion of anything like that?

Nathan Myers
ncm@zembu.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
Date:
Subject: Cursor support in pl/pg
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Cursor support in pl/pg