Re: Re: [BUGS] three VERY minor things with 7.1 final - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: Re: [BUGS] three VERY minor things with 7.1 final
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.33.0104172127020.11774-100000@mobile.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] three VERY minor things with 7.1 final  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> David George <david@onyxsoft.com> writes:
> > I just built the postgresql 7.1 final and the configure script is still
> > checking for sfio.  Not a major big deal, but I need to remove the sfio
> > check from configure.in, run autoconf, and then configure to fix it.  If
> > you remember sfio on Sparc Solaris 7 was causing a segfault when psql
> > would display its output.
>
> Hmm.  Digging in the CVS logs and pghackers archives, it seems that
> configure started checking for sfio in response to Michael Richards'
> unsubstantiated claim that FreeBSD 2.2.5 requires it to be used
> (http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-hackers/1998-04/msg00363.html).
> Can anyone confirm or deny that?  Marc had previously expressed some
> interest as well (thread starting at
> http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-hackers/1998-04/msg00219.html)
> but the outcome of that thread didn't seem to suggest that it's a
> must-have item.

Damn, now *that* is an old thread ... I can't see any reason why it would
be required for FreeBSD, as its only a port for the OS, not part of it ...

> I'm tempted to rip out the configure check for sfio, but if it's only
> broken on some systems and really is useful on others, then we have to
> try to figure out how to tell if it's broken :-(

Pull it, as far as I'm conerned ...




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs?
Next
From: Alex Pilosov
Date:
Subject: [BUG] views and functions on relations