RE: WAL feature - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikheev, Vadim
Subject RE: WAL feature
Date
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D33E1@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to WAL feature  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses RE: WAL feature  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > >     Row reuse without vacuum
> >
> > Yes, it will help to remove uncommitted rows.
> 
> Same question as I asked Bruce ... how? :)  I wasn't trying to be
> fascisious(sp?) when I asked, I didn't realize the two were
> connected and am curious as to how :)

After implementing UNDO operation (we have only REDO now)
transactions will roll back their changes on abort and so
free space occupied by inserted rows.

How to re-use freed space (ie how to maintain information about
blocks available for insertion of new rows) is another issue,
of course, but anyway - space must be freed first.

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL feature
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ...