Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> >> CREATE INDEX hash_i4_index ON hash_i4_heap USING hash (random int4_ops);
> >> + ERROR:  cannot read block 3 of hash_i4_index: Bad address
> 
> "Bad address"?  That seems pretty bizarre.

This is obviously something that shows up on _some_ NetBSD platforms.
The above was on sparc64, but that same problem is the only one I see
in the regression testing on NetBSD/vax that isn't just different
floating point (the VAX doesn't have IEEE), different ordering of
(unordered) collections or different wording of strerror() output.

NetBSD/i386 doesn't have the "Bad address" problem.

-tih
-- 
The basic difference is this: hackers build things, crackers break them.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Adriaan Joubert
Date:
Subject: Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix
Next
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix