Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 May 1999

02:38 A select with aggretion is failing, still subtle problems with ag gregation Michael J Davis
07:23 locking... Vadim Mikheev
10:57 DeadLockCheck... Vadim Mikheev
14:23 I'm planning some changes in lmgr... Vadim Mikheev
14:39 Re: [HACKERS] A select with aggretion is failing, still subtle problems with aggregation Tom Lane
15:16 Re: [HACKERS] A patch for FATAL 1:btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected Vadim Mikheev
15:31 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604 Oleg Bartunov
15:38 Re: Returned mail: User unknown Vadim Mikheev
16:20 Re: [HACKERS] patches for 6.5.0 Tom Lane
18:08 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Tom Lane
18:08 Just a test Marc G. Fournier
18:19 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian
18:23 cache startup file Bruce Momjian
18:59 One test... The Hermit Hacker
19:03 Last test... The Hermit Hacker
19:28 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604 Tom Lane
19:40 Re: cache startup file Tom Lane
22:52 Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec Tom Lane
23:10 Shouldn't this be invalid? Tom Lane

2 May 1999

03:30 query dumping core Bruce Momjian
04:43 Re: [HACKERS] query dumping core Tom Lane
11:56 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tatsuo Ishii
12:35 Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Chris Bitmead
13:57 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tatsuo Ishii
16:12 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tom Lane
23:55 GROUP BY fixes committed Tom Lane

3 May 1999

00:29 Re: [OT] Timezones and Daylight savings. BLuehAZE@att.net (KaTMiX)
07:59 (no subject) Thomas Malkus
10:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Peter T Mount
10:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Peter T Mount
10:43 an older problem? hash table out of memory Michael Contzen
13:14 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tatsuo Ishii
13:30 Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Tom Lane
13:51 Jsut a test of mail relaying ... The Hermit Hacker
15:18 XIDTAG ??? Vadim Mikheev
15:27 Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? Bruce Momjian
16:01 pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) Ross J. Reedstrom
16:04 Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Thomas Lockhart
16:23 Re: [HACKERS] GROUP BY fixes committed Thomas Lockhart
16:36 adate::Date is equiv. to adate if adate is type of Date ? Oleg Bartunov
17:01 RE: [HACKERS] GROUP BY fixes committed Michael J Davis
17:31 problems with parser Massimo Dal Zotto
17:31 new patches for 6.5.0 Massimo Dal Zotto
18:08 Re: [HACKERS] new patches for 6.5.0 Bruce Momjian
18:35 posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov
21:57 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) Tom Lane
22:35 subscribe Ciaran Dunn
22:36 Ciaran Dunn
23:22 Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Tom Lane

4 May 1999

01:29 Re: [HACKERS] adate::Date is equiv. to adate if adate is type of Date ? Thomas Lockhart
01:35 Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? Todd Graham Lewis
03:39 Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Bruce Momjian
03:41 Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? Bruce Momjian
04:11 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tatsuo Ishii
05:12 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov
06:27 RE: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Peter Mount
06:32 Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? Massimo Dal Zotto
12:04 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Thomas Lockhart
12:13 Re: [HACKERS] adate::Date is equiv. to adate if adate is type of Date ? Thomas Lockhart
12:22 Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? José Soares
12:26 Re: [HACKERS] problems with parser José Soares
12:28 [Fwd: Bug report.] Thomas Lockhart
12:31 Re: [INTERFACES] error message José Soares
12:52 varchar-array.patch applied Tom Lane
12:55 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) Thomas Lockhart
13:05 Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Tom Lane
13:20 Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart
13:34 Re: [HACKERS] adate::Date is equiv. to adate if adate is type of Date ? Tom Lane
13:47 Re: [HACKERS] varchar-array.patch applied Thomas Lockhart
13:57 Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? Todd Graham Lewis
14:07 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tatsuo Ishii
14:08 Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code Tom Lane
14:27 major flaw in 6.5beta1??? (UPDATE/INSERT waiting) Dirk Lutzebaeck
14:38 RE: [INTERFACES] error message JT Kirkpatrick
14:46 Re: [HACKERS] adate::Date is equiv. to adate if adate is type of Date ? Oleg Bartunov
15:08 Advice wanted on backend memory management Tom Lane
15:22 Re: [HACKERS] major flaw in 6.5beta1??? (UPDATE/INSERT waiting) Tom Lane
16:02 Re: [HACKERS] varchar-array.patch applied Bruce Momjian
16:03 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) Bruce Momjian
16:32 Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Bruce Momjian
16:33 Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Bruce Momjian
17:06 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov
17:14 Mirror mess... (urgent) Daniele Orlandi
17:24 Re: [HACKERS] Mirror mess... (urgent) Oleg Bartunov
18:25 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov
18:38 Re: [HACKERS] varchar-array.patch appliedu Massimo Dal Zotto
20:30 ODBC with postgresql v6.5beta1 rheller@us.ibm.com
22:30 Re: [HACKERS] Mirror mess... (urgent) The Hermit Hacker
22:30 Re: [HACKERS] Mirror mess... (urgent) The Hermit Hacker
22:46 Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Tom Lane
23:32 6.4.2 core dumping. Christian

5 May 1999

00:21 Re: [HACKERS] Advice wanted on backend memory management Vadim Mikheev
00:32 || in v6.4.2 ... The Hermit Hacker
00:37 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Bruce Momjian
00:42 Re: [HACKERS] || in v6.4.2 ... Bruce Momjian
01:13 RE: [HACKERS] I'm planning some changes in lmgr... Hiroshi Inoue
02:58 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov
05:40 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) Thomas Lockhart
06:27 Re: [HACKERS] major flaw in 6.5beta1??? (UPDATE/INSERT waiting) Dirk Lutzebaeck
06:51 Re: [HACKERS] major flaw in 6.5beta1??? (UPDATE/INSERT waiting) Dirk Lutzebaeck
12:00 Small improvement Dmitry Samersoff
12:05 What does it mean? Dmitry Samersoff
12:40 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tom Lane
12:51 Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement Bruce Momjian
13:02 Re: [HACKERS] Advice wanted on backend memory management Tom Lane
13:19 Re: [HACKERS] Mirror mess... (urgent) Michael Davis
13:24 Re: [HACKERS] Advice wanted on backend memory management Michael Davis
13:25 RE: [HACKERS] I'm planning some changes in lmgr... Michael Davis
13:26 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Michael Davis
13:27 Re: [HACKERS] major flaw in 6.5beta1??? (UPDATE/INSERT waiting) Michael Davis
13:27 Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement Michael Davis
13:43 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov
13:47 Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement Michael.Davis@tvguide.com (Michael Davis)
13:48 Re: [HACKERS] major flaw in 6.5beta1??? (UPDATE/INSERT waiting) Michael.Davis@tvguide.com (Michael Davis)
13:48 Re: [HACKERS] Advice wanted on backend memory management Michael.Davis@tvguide.com (Michael Davis)
13:49 RE: [HACKERS] I'm planning some changes in lmgr... Michael.Davis@tvguide.com (Michael Davis)
13:50 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Michael.Davis@tvguide.com (Michael Davis)
13:51 Re: [HACKERS] Mirror mess... (urgent) Michael.Davis@tvguide.com (Michael Davis)
13:58 Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Tom Lane
14:08 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tom Lane
14:19 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Bruce Momjian
14:22 Problem with function indexing Martin Weinberg
14:38 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov
15:29 unsubscribe problems Michael J Davis
15:36 new patches Massimo Dal Zotto
17:36 Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc (fwd) Peter T Mount
18:45 which guru know this ?? Carlos Peralta Ramirez
18:57 RE: [GENERAL] which guru know this ?? Michael J Davis
19:11 dying backend processes postgres admin
20:38 Re: [HACKERS] new patches Bruce Momjian
21:21 adv: Important Psychic Message For You... silvia_brown@usa.net
22:10 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tom Lane
22:33 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with function indexing Tom Lane
23:26 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tom Lane

6 May 1999

00:51 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Taral
02:31 Re: INSERT/UPDATE waiting (another example) Wayne Piekarski
02:57 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov
04:25 Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Bruce Momjian
04:26 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Bruce Momjian
05:01 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov
05:05 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Taral
05:32 Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart
05:37 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Bruce Momjian
06:38 Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Vadim Mikheev
06:39 Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Bruce Momjian
07:56 Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Vadim Mikheev
11:15 Re: [HACKERS] can't compile The Hermit Hacker
11:20 Re: [HACKERS] What does it mean? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:05 Re: [HACKERS] Re: INSERT/UPDATE waiting (another example) Tom Lane
13:20 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tom Lane
13:40 RE: [HACKERS] I'm planning some changes in lmgr... The Hermit Hacker
13:44 Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Broytmann
14:24 RE: [HACKERS] I'm planning some changes in lmgr... Michael J Davis
15:13 Hashjoin status report Tom Lane
15:13 Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Tom Lane
16:25 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report The Hermit Hacker
20:04 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Tom Lane
20:34 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Tom Lane

7 May 1999

00:30 the today question !!! Carlos Peralta Ramirez
00:34 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report The Hermit Hacker
00:54 Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Vadim Mikheev
00:55 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Vadim Mikheev
00:55 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report The Hermit Hacker
01:33 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Tatsuo Ishii
01:37 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Tom Lane
02:07 Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Bruce Momjian
02:35 pg_dump problem? Chris Bitmead
03:02 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Bruce Momjian
03:53 Re:pg_dump barfs? Chris Bitmead
04:13 Re: [HACKERS] Re:pg_dump barfs? Chris Bitmead
05:09 cvs 6.5 regression tests on Linux x86 Oleg Bartunov
06:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re:pg_dump barfs? Chris Bitmead
07:43 AW: [HACKERS] cvs 6.5 regression tests on Linux x86 ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
08:00 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Michael Contzen
10:21 Weird Errors in 6.4.2 - Indexes/Vacuuming Tim Perdue
10:48 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
12:30 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? Chris Bitmead
12:41 Re: [HACKERS] cvs 6.5 regression tests on Linux x86 Tom Lane
12:48 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? geek+@cmu.edu
13:00 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Tom Lane
13:19 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? Tom Lane
13:40 Re: [HACKERS] Re:pg_dump barfs? Tom Lane
14:12 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? Chris Bitmead
14:21 Re: [HACKERS] Re:pg_dump barfs? Chris Bitmead
14:25 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? geek+@cmu.edu
14:59 Re: Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code Tom Lane
15:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code geek+@cmu.edu
15:23 Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser gram.c' Tom Lane
17:08 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code Tom Lane
20:17 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? Tom Lane
21:15 NUMERIC type conversions leave much to be desired Tom Lane
21:31 pg_dump doesn't dump NUMERIC precision info Tom Lane
22:00 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? Bruce Momjian
22:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re:pg_dump barfs? Bruce Momjian
22:02 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Bruce Momjian
22:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code Bruce Momjian
22:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code] Bruce Momjian

8 May 1999

00:57 Functions for arrays !!!! Carlos Peralta Ramirez
01:48 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC type conversions leave much to be desired Thomas Lockhart
07:53 MVCC vacuum error Hiroshi Inoue
08:12 Date/Time Flaw in pg_dump ? Chris Bitmead
08:32 ODMG interface Chris Bitmead
12:10 Help a newbie? Rafael Kaufmann
12:35 Re: help impressing the crowd (fwd) Oleg Bartunov
12:58 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
14:13 Re: [HACKERS] Help a newbie? Tom Lane
14:27 Re: [HACKERS] ODMG interface Tom Lane
15:03 Re: [HACKERS] ODMG interface Chris Bitmead
15:28 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC type conversions leave much to be desired Tom Lane
15:45 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO Thomas Lockhart
15:56 Re: [HACKERS] Date/Time Flaw in pg_dump ? Thomas Lockhart
16:01 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC type conversions leave much to be desired Thomas Lockhart
16:02 Re: [HACKERS] Help a newbie? Bruce Momjian
16:04 Re: [HACKERS] Help a newbie? Rafael Kaufmann
16:04 Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/test/regress/expected case.out' Thomas Lockhart
16:19 Re: [HACKERS] Help a newbie? Thomas Lockhart
16:30 Minor pg_dump buglet gjerde@icebox.org
16:41 sql regress files missing Patrick Welche
20:14 Re: [HACKERS] sql regress files missing Tom Lane

9 May 1999

01:39 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC type conversions leave much to be desired Tom Lane
02:17 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tatsuo Ishii
02:57 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC type conversions leave much to be desired Thomas Lockhart
03:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Bruce Momjian
05:43 New version of CVSup built for linux Thomas Lockhart
05:56 problem compiling 6.5 cvs Oleg Bartunov
07:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re: INSERT/UPDATE waiting (another example) Wayne Piekarski
07:13 Re: 6.4.2 patch for shared-memory hashtable bugs Wayne Piekarski
07:52 Frage! GreatFreak
09:33 Re: [HACKERS] sql regress files missing Patrick Welche
09:52 Re: Frage! Johannes.Weitzel@t-online.de (Johannes Weitzel)
09:54 Re: [HACKERS] ODMG interface Hannu Krosing
10:32 Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Re: INSERT/UPDATE waiting (another example) Bruce Momjian
10:55 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Bruce Momjian
10:55 Re: [ADMIN] maximum attribute record. Bruce Momjian
10:56 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Bruce Momjian
11:03 Re: [HACKERS] ODMG interface Chris Bitmead
12:03 Re: [HACKERS] char(n) default '' crashes server Bruce Momjian
12:15 Re: [HACKERS] Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Bruce Momjian
13:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser gram.c' Vadim Mikheev
13:01 Re: [HACKERS] MVCC vacuum error Vadim Mikheev
13:56 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Bruce Momjian
13:57 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query Bruce Momjian
14:04 Re: [HACKERS] Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Thomas Lockhart
14:23 Problem installing plpgsql Dmitry Samersoff
14:23 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Thomas Lockhart
14:33 Re: [GENERAL] inet and cidr type problems Bruce Momjian
14:52 Re: [GENERAL] inet and cidr type problems Bruce Momjian
14:53 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tom Lane
15:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Number of parameters in a sql function Bruce Momjian
15:04 Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions Bruce Momjian
15:05 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC type conversions leave much to be desired Tom Lane
15:52 Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions Thomas Lockhart
15:59 Re: [HACKERS] Re: INSERT/UPDATE waiting (another example) Tom Lane
16:07 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] maximum attribute record. Tom Lane
16:22 Re: [HACKERS] ODMG interface Tom Lane
16:34 Re: [HACKERS] Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Tom Lane
16:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Number of parameters in a sql function Tom Lane
16:50 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query Tom Lane
19:09 Re: [GENERAL] Comments on columns? Bruce Momjian
19:11 Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Bruce Momjian
19:51 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Taral
19:52 Re: [HACKERS] Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Taral
20:14 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC type conversions leave much to be desired Thomas Lockhart
20:43 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC type conversions leave much to be desired Tom Lane
22:32 Re: [HACKERS] New version of CVSup built for linux Thomas Lockhart
23:45 Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Bruce Momjian
23:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Bruce Momjian
23:51 Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire) Bruce Momjian
23:53 Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Ryan Bradetich
23:54 Re: [HACKERS] parser enhancement request for 6.5 Bruce Momjian

10 May 1999

00:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tatsuo Ishii
00:07 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum slowness Bruce Momjian
00:20 RE: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Hiroshi Inoue
03:36 Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Bruce Momjian
03:53 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO Bruce Momjian
04:01 Re: [HACKERS] ecpg fixes Bruce Momjian
04:03 Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug: alias is a "non-group column"? Bruce Momjian
04:06 Re: [HACKERS] "op must return bool to be used with subquery"? Bruce Momjian
06:19 RE: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Peter Mount
06:52 SQl Mail LIst (Spanish) J M Doren
07:31 Re: [HACKERS] Beta2? Tatsuo Ishii
07:52 Re: Frage! M.J. Blom
07:54 Can a function return tuples Werachart Jantarataeme
07:54 How can I use UNION in VIEW/RULE? Werachart Jantarataeme
08:46 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Number of parameters in a sql function ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
09:34 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query Oleg Broytmann
09:40 Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Re: INSERT/UPDATE waiting (another example) Wayne Piekarski
09:48 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
11:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: INSERT/UPDATE waiting (another example) Wayne Piekarski
13:50 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:51 Re: [HACKERS] parser enhancement request for 6.5 Thomas Lockhart
13:52 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:01 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE leaks file descriptors Bruce Momjian
14:10 Re: NEW REFINT.C Bruce Momjian
14:13 Re: [HACKERS] Problem installing plpgsql jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:21 Re: AW: [HACKERS] misc and triggers regression tests failed on 6.5bet a1 Bruce Momjian
14:26 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO Thomas Lockhart
14:37 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo Bruce Momjian
14:49 Re: [HACKERS] Pretty bad bug in Postgres. Bruce Momjian
14:51 Re: [HACKERS] Pretty bad bug in Postgres. Bruce Momjian
15:04 Re: [HACKERS] Python interface is out of date Bruce Momjian
15:10 Re: [PORTS] UnixWare 7 patches for current CVS code. Bruce Momjian
15:12 Re: [HACKERS] Some info about subselect/having problems Bruce Momjian
15:13 Re: [HACKERS] Oracle TRUNCATE statement Bruce Momjian
15:16 Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TEMP TABLE Bruce Momjian
15:16 Re: [HACKERS] Heads up: does RULES regress test still work for you? Bruce Momjian
15:19 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO ... SELECT eats all my memory Bruce Momjian
15:20 Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Bruce Momjian
15:24 Re: [HACKERS] Pretty bad bug in Postgres. Vadim Mikheev
15:27 Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Bruce Momjian
15:30 Re: [HACKERS] parser enhancement request for 6.5 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
15:32 Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Tom Lane
15:37 Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal Bruce Momjian
15:39 Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug: alias is a "non-group column"? Tom Lane
15:40 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO ... SELECT eats all my memory Vadim Mikheev
15:41 Re: [HACKERS] Help/advice/suggestions on query optimizer for a large table Bruce Momjian
15:41 Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
15:45 Re: [HACKERS] "op must return bool to be used with subquery"? Tom Lane
15:47 Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name? Bruce Momjian
15:47 Re: [HACKERS] Beta2? Tom Lane
15:48 Re: [HACKERS] A select with aggretion is failing, still subtle problems with aggregation Bruce Momjian
15:50 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO Tom Lane
15:50 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604 Bruce Momjian
15:51 Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec Bruce Momjian
15:53 Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Bruce Momjian
15:53 Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
15:55 Re: [HACKERS] GROUP BY fixes committed Bruce Momjian
16:07 Re: [HACKERS] problems with parser Bruce Momjian
16:09 Re: [HACKERS] Some info about subselect/having problems jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
16:19 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE leaks file descriptors Tom Lane
16:19 Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name? Ulf Mehlig
16:25 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? Bruce Momjian
16:26 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604 Tom Lane
16:28 Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TEMP TABLE Thomas Lockhart
16:31 Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Thomas Lockhart
16:32 Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec Tom Lane
16:34 Re: [HACKERS] problems with parser Thomas Lockhart
16:40 Re: [HACKERS] GROUP BY fixes committed Tom Lane
16:47 Lost my mailbox Bruce Momjian
16:47 Re: [HACKERS] Python interface is out of date D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
16:54 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
16:57 Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal Thomas Lockhart
16:57 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604 Oleg Bartunov
17:05 Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:19 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO Bruce Momjian
17:21 Re: [HACKERS] Minor pg_dump buglet Bruce Momjian
17:28 Re: [HACKERS] Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Bruce Momjian
17:29 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Bruce Momjian
17:30 Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:34 Re: [HACKERS] GROUP BY fixes committed Bruce Momjian
17:36 Re: [HACKERS] Lost my mailbox Bruce Momjian
17:40 Querytree printing jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:41 Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal Bruce Momjian
17:41 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604 Bruce Momjian
17:52 Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
18:01 NULL = col Bruce Momjian
18:07 subselects Bruce Momjian
18:18 RE: [HACKERS] NULL = col Michael J Davis
18:28 Re: [HACKERS] Querytree printing Bruce Momjian
18:30 Re: [HACKERS] NULL = col Bruce Momjian
18:31 RE: [HACKERS] NULL = col Michael J Davis
18:32 6.5 TODO list Bruce Momjian
18:52 Re: Frage! Gabriele.Neukam@t-online.de (Gabriele Neukam)
18:53 Re: subselects Tom Lane
19:30 Re: subselects Bruce Momjian
20:31 IRC, webcam, IM Bruce Momjian
20:38 Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Bruce Momjian
20:50 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Tom Lane
20:57 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Tom Lane
21:02 New 6.5 Open Items list Bruce Momjian
21:02 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Bruce Momjian
21:03 Newer list Bruce Momjian
21:08 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tatsuo Ishii
22:52 Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Chris Bitmead
23:09 Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Bruce Momjian
23:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Bruce Momjian
23:58 Re: [HACKERS] Beta2? Tatsuo Ishii
23:59 Optimization info Taral

11 May 1999

00:00 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Tatsuo Ishii
00:06 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Bruce Momjian
00:06 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Taral
00:22 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Tatsuo Ishii
00:34 Re: [HACKERS] Optimization info Bruce Momjian
00:41 Re: IRC, webcam, IM Bruce Momjian
00:49 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Taral
00:52 Re: [HACKERS] Optimization info Taral
01:43 Re: [HACKERS] Optimization info Bruce Momjian
01:44 Re: [HACKERS] Optimization info Taral
01:56 web site addition Bruce Momjian
02:02 Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal Thomas Lockhart
02:21 Don Baccus
02:22 Re: NULL = col Thomas Lockhart
02:23 Re: [HACKERS] NULL = col Thomas Lockhart
02:45 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Thomas Lockhart
02:54 RE: [HACKERS] NULL = col Michael J Davis
03:20 Re: [GENERAL] IRC, webcam, IM The Hermit Hacker
03:31 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Bruce Momjian
04:10 database comparisons Bruce Momjian
04:20 RE: [HACKERS] web site addition Dmitry Samersoff
04:31 pgaccess and Informix Bruce Momjian
05:00 Re: [HACKERS] Problem installing plpgsql Dmitry Samersoff
05:46 problem compiling 6.5 cvs (Linux, gcc 2.7.2, egcs 1.12) Oleg Bartunov
08:03 Re: [HACKERS] Querytree printing jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
08:37 Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling 6.5 cvs (Linux, gcc 2.7.2, egcs 1.12) gjerde@icebox.org
09:03 Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling 6.5 cvs (Linux, gcc 2.7.2, egcs 1.12) Oleg Bartunov
09:14 Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling 6.5 cvs (Linux, gcc 2.7.2, egcs 1.12) gjerde@icebox.org
09:14 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Tatsuo Ishii
10:19 Re: [HACKERS] Date/Time Flaw in pg_dump ? Chris Bitmead
10:52 Re: Frage! Heinz Ekker
11:08 AW: AW: [HACKERS] misc and triggers regression tests failed on 6. 5bet a1 ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
12:22 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
12:55 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Tom Lane
13:06 SERIAL + PRIMARY KEY = redundant indexes Tom Lane
13:19 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Tom Lane
13:20 Re: [HACKERS] Beta2? Tom Lane
13:38 Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling 6.5 cvs (Linux, gcc 2.7.2, egcs 1.12) Tom Lane
13:40 Re: [HACKERS] Date/Time Flaw in pg_dump ? Thomas Lockhart
13:44 Re: [HACKERS] Date/Time Flaw in pg_dump ? Tom Lane
14:08 Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] misc and triggers regression tests failed on 6. 5bet a1 Bruce Momjian
14:11 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Bruce Momjian
14:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Bruce Momjian
14:35 Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling 6.5 cvs (Linux, gcc 2.7.2, egcs 1.12) Oleg Bartunov
14:39 Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL + PRIMARY KEY = redundant indexes Thomas Lockhart
14:52 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Oliver Elphick
14:55 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604 Oleg Bartunov
15:04 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
15:09 Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL + PRIMARY KEY = redundant indexes Thomas Lockhart
15:31 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604 Bruce Momjian
15:52 Re: [INTERFACES] Bug in psql? reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu (Ross J. Reedstrom)
16:01 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604 Oleg Bartunov
16:09 More on GROUP BY jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
16:23 new SCO installation FAQ Andrew Merrill
16:30 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list The Hermit Hacker
16:54 Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling 6.5 cvs (Linux, gcc 2.7.2, egcs 1.12) Tom Lane
17:01 Re: [HACKERS] More on GROUP BY Bruce Momjian
17:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Brian P Millett
17:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Tom Lane
17:21 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Tom Lane
17:24 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Bruce Momjian
17:30 Re: [HACKERS] More on GROUP BY Tom Lane
17:37 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Bruce Momjian
17:39 Re: [HACKERS] problems with parser Massimo Dal Zotto
17:45 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Christopher Masto
18:02 Re: [HACKERS] More on GROUP BY Bruce Momjian
18:03 RE: [HACKERS] web site addition Vince Vielhaber
18:07 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Tom Lane
18:12 Re: [HACKERS] problems with parser Bruce Momjian
18:15 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list The Hermit Hacker
18:44 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Bruce Momjian
19:24 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list gjerde@icebox.org
19:49 sequences vs. transactions Vazsonyi Peter
21:01 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Brook Milligan
21:06 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Bruce Momjian
22:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Tom Lane
22:27 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Tom Lane
22:45 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Tom Lane
22:51 Re: [HACKERS] Date/Time Flaw in pg_dump ? Chris Bitmead
23:10 Re: [HACKERS] Date/Time Flaw in pg_dump ? Chris Bitmead
23:39 backend closed the channel unexpectedly David Wetzel

12 May 1999

00:02 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Tatsuo Ishii
01:09 Re: sequences vs. transactions Bruce Momjian
01:12 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Bruce Momjian
01:16 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list Bruce Momjian
01:32 Current Open Items Bruce Momjian
03:08 Re: [HACKERS] Pg takes at least 2 hours to retrieve 7650 rows José Soares
03:43 Re: [HACKERS] Beta2? Tom Lane
03:56 Re: [HACKERS] ecpg fixes Michael Meskes
04:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Bruce Momjian
04:30 Re: [HACKERS] ecpg fixes Bruce Momjian
05:07 Re: [HACKERS] Beta2? Tatsuo Ishii
06:34 Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TEMP TABLE Thomas Lockhart
07:50 Re: [HACKERS] misc and triggers regression tests failed on 6. 5be t a1 ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
08:13 defalut value Tatsuo Ishii
09:24 Re: [HACKERS] More on GROUP BY jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
09:29 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
09:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
09:48 backend dies suddenly after a lot of error messages Mirko Kaffka
10:15 Re: [HACKERS] More on GROUP BY jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
10:26 Re: [GENERAL] backend dies suddenly after a lot of error messages Thomas Reinke
11:48 Re: [HACKERS] misc and triggers regression tests failed on 6. 5be t a1 Bruce Momjian
11:52 nice software shopping Larry Cage
11:53 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Bruce Momjian
12:00 Re: [HACKERS] defalut value Bruce Momjian
12:00 Update Open Items list Bruce Momjian
13:13 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Tom Lane
13:14 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Brook Milligan
13:17 Re: [HACKERS] Update Open Items list Thomas Lockhart
13:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Tom Lane
14:05 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:08 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:14 Re: [HACKERS] backend dies suddenly after a lot of error messages Tom Lane
14:15 Re: [HACKERS] defalut value Tom Lane
14:18 Re: [HACKERS] More on GROUP BY jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:19 Re: [HACKERS] Date/Time Flaw in pg_dump ? reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu (Ross J. Reedstrom)
14:21 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error Tom Lane
14:29 Re: [HACKERS] defalut value Thomas Lockhart
14:30 Re: [HACKERS] Update Open Items list jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
15:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
15:08 BUG? serials and primary keys (was Re: [INTERFACES] Bug in psql?) Ross J. Reedstrom
15:36 Re: [HACKERS] backend dies suddenly after a lot of error messages jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
16:06 Re: [HACKERS] Update Open Items list jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
16:44 Re: [HACKERS] backend dies suddenly after a lot of error messages Tom Lane
16:52 WHERE vs HAVING jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
16:54 Re: [HACKERS] BUG? serials and primary keys (was Re: [INTERFACES] Bug in psql?) Tom Lane
17:07 Re: [HACKERS] WHERE vs HAVING Tom Lane
18:27 Patch to pg_dump for NUMERIC. Keith Parks
22:16 Re: [HACKERS] backend closed the channel unexpectedly Tom Lane
22:42 Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] backend closed the channel unexpectedly David Wetzel
22:52 help craig
23:34 Re: [HACKERS] backend dies suddenly after a lot of error messages Tom Lane

13 May 1999

00:09 Re: [HACKERS] backend dies suddenly after a lot of error messages Don Baccus
00:41 Re: [HACKERS] backend dies suddenly after a lot of error messages Tom Lane
00:48 Information about backend waiting Wayne Piekarski
01:04 Re: [HACKERS] backend dies suddenly after a lot of error messages Don Baccus
01:31 Re: [HACKERS] BUG? serials and primary keys (was Re: [INTERFACES] Bug in psql?) Bruce Momjian
01:35 Re: [PATCHES] Patch to pg_dump for NUMERIC. Bruce Momjian
01:35 Re: [HACKERS] backend dies suddenly after a lot of error messages Bruce Momjian
01:46 Re: [HACKERS] backend dies suddenly after a lot of error messages Bruce Momjian
02:58 test Vadim Mikheev
08:49 CVS mirrors? Pedro J. Lobo
09:25 [HACKERS] spinlock freeze ?(Re: INSERT/UPDATE waiting (another example)) Hiroshi Inoue
10:24 RE: [HACKERS] CVS mirrors? Dmitry Samersoff
11:24 Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle Oleg Bartunov
11:33 RE: [HACKERS] CVS mirrors? The Hermit Hacker
12:38 Someone finally put it into print... The Hermit Hacker
12:50 Re: [HACKERS] Re: IRC, webcam, IM Thomas Lockhart
13:17 Re: [HACKERS] Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle Tom Lane
13:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: IRC, webcam, IM The Hermit Hacker
13:36 Re: [HACKERS] Someone finally put it into print... Tom Lane
13:42 Re: [HACKERS] Someone finally put it into print... The Hermit Hacker
14:47 6.5 cvs: views doesn't survives after pg_dump Oleg Bartunov
15:06 Re: [HACKERS] Re: IRC, webcam, IM Bruce Momjian
15:10 Re: [HACKERS] Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle Bruce Momjian
18:50 Re: [HACKERS] Someone finally put it into print... Taral
20:01 Distributed Copyright? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Someone finally put it into print...) Clark Evans
21:26 Report on NetBSD/mac port of Postgres 6.4.2 Henry B. Hotz
21:33 Patch for NetBSD/mac port of Postgres 6.4.2 Henry B. Hotz
22:33 Re: Report on NetBSD/mac port of Postgres 6.4.2 Thomas Lockhart
23:02 Some progress on INSERT/SELECT/GROUP BY bugs Tom Lane
23:57 Progress on char(n) default-value problem Tom Lane

14 May 1999

00:03 Re: [HACKERS] Report on NetBSD/mac port of Postgres 6.4.2 Tatsuo Ishii
00:11 Re: [HACKERS] Progress on char(n) default-value problem Bruce Momjian
00:22 Re: [HACKERS] Some progress on INSERT/SELECT/GROUP BY bugs Bruce Momjian
00:33 Re: [HACKERS] Progress on char(n) default-value problem Tom Lane
06:53 lmgr changed Vadim Mikheev
10:31 CVS Chris Bitmead
10:38 Re: [HACKERS] CVS Todd Graham Lewis
10:38 Re: [HACKERS] CVS Todd Graham Lewis
10:43 Re: [HACKERS] CVS Todd Graham Lewis
11:22 System Catalogs Chris Bitmead
11:33 Re: [HACKERS] CVS Daniel Lundin
11:33 ADD COLUMN Chris Bitmead
11:46 Re: [HACKERS] lmgr changed Vadim Mikheev
12:00 Re: [HACKERS] lmgr changed Bruce Momjian
12:20 Re: [HACKERS] System Catalogs Bernard Frankpitt
12:28 configure --with-xxxx problem Oleg Bartunov
12:31 Re: [HACKERS] CVS Thomas Lockhart
13:39 Re: [HACKERS] CVS Tom Lane
13:47 Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem Tom Lane
14:00 Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem Maarten Boekhold
14:50 Re: [HACKERS] CVS Daniel Lundin
15:10 Re: [HACKERS] CVS The Hermit Hacker
16:07 rules regression test Patrick Welche
18:49 postgresql bug report (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
19:37 6.5 cvs: problem with includes in src/interfaces/libpq++/ Oleg Bartunov
20:47 Re: [HACKERS] postgresql bug report (fwd) Tom Lane
20:52 Re: [HACKERS] rules regression test Tom Lane
21:01 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: problem with includes in src/interfaces/libpq++/ Tom Lane
23:59 Re: [HACKERS] postgresql bug report (fwd) Tatsuo Ishii

15 May 1999

00:04 Re: [HACKERS] postgresql bug report (fwd) Tatsuo Ishii
05:32 How good is FreeBSD for postgres ? Oleg Bartunov
06:01 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo Ole Gjerde
08:00 Re: [HACKERS] System Catalogs Bruce Momjian
08:00 Re: [HACKERS] ADD COLUMN Bruce Momjian
08:01 Re: [HACKERS] CVS Bruce Momjian
08:03 Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem Bruce Momjian
08:32 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: problem with includes in src/interfaces/libpq++/ Bruce Momjian
08:32 Re: [HACKERS] postgresql bug report (fwd) Bruce Momjian
10:50 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: problem with includes in src/interfaces/libpq++/ prlw1@cam.ac.uk (Patrick Welche)
11:43 Syntax of LOCK TABLE ... David Sauer
17:30 Re: [HACKERS] Syntax of LOCK TABLE ... Bruce Momjian
21:32 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo Bruce Momjian
21:33 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo Bruce Momjian
22:52 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo Ole Gjerde

16 May 1999

02:10 Memory leaks in relcache Tom Lane
03:07 Misleading Error Message Kristofer Munn
04:31 Re: [HACKERS] Misleading Error Message Bruce Momjian
04:46 Re: [HACKERS] How good is FreeBSD for postgres ? The Hermit Hacker
06:13 select + order by Tatsuo Ishii
13:06 Re: [HACKERS] How good is FreeBSD for postgres ? Tom Lane
13:08 Re: [HACKERS] select + order by Tom Lane
13:57 Re: [HACKERS] Re: sequences vs. transactions Vazsonyi Peter
15:06 Re: [HACKERS] Syntax of LOCK TABLE ... Tom Lane
15:16 Re: [HACKERS] Syntax of LOCK TABLE ... Vadim Mikheev
20:12 Re: [HACKERS] How good is FreeBSD for postgres ? Oleg Bartunov
20:48 Re: [HACKERS] How good is FreeBSD for postgres ? Oleg Bartunov
23:23 Re: [HACKERS] Syntax of LOCK TABLE ... Bruce Momjian
23:29 sgmr* vs. md* Bruce Momjian
23:32 Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
23:55 Re: [HACKERS] select + order by Tatsuo Ishii
23:58 GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Tom Lane

17 May 1999

00:02 Re: [HACKERS] select + order by Bruce Momjian
00:16 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo Tom Lane
00:18 Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Bruce Momjian
01:35 BUG report: ERROR: Cannot expand tables; .... David Sauer
01:41 DROP TABLE does not drop a table completely Hiroshi Inoue
01:50 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo Ole Gjerde
02:35 Re: [HACKERS] How good is FreeBSD for postgres ? The Hermit Hacker
03:19 Re: [HACKERS] BUG report: ERROR: Cannot expand tables; .... Bruce Momjian
04:01 Re: [HACKERS] Memory leaks in relcache Bruce Momjian
04:04 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo Tom Lane
04:12 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE leaks file descriptors Tom Lane
04:20 State of v6.5 under FreeBSD The Hermit Hacker
04:25 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo Ole Gjerde
04:32 Re: [HACKERS] Memory leaks in relcache Bruce Momjian
05:13 Re: [HACKERS] How good is FreeBSD for postgres ? Oleg Bartunov
05:17 Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Oleg Bartunov
05:35 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Ole Gjerde
05:40 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
05:40 Re: [HACKERS] sgmr* vs. md* Ole Gjerde
06:02 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE does not drop a table completely Vadim Mikheev
06:36 RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE does not drop a table completely Hiroshi Inoue
07:19 Re: [HACKERS] rules regression test jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
07:29 Re: [HACKERS] Misleading Error Message jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
07:52 Re: [HACKERS] select + order by jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
08:04 Re: [HACKERS] rules regression test jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
08:47 RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Hiroshi Inoue
12:14 Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Erik Riedel
12:46 Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Tom Lane
13:06 Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Oleg Bartunov
13:08 Re: [HACKERS] Syntax of LOCK TABLE ... Thomas Lockhart
13:13 Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Oleg Bartunov
13:22 Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Tom Lane
13:34 Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Oleg Bartunov
13:51 Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Tom Lane
14:26 Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Tom Lane
14:42 Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Oleg Bartunov
14:55 Obtaining a backtrace (was Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer) Tom Lane
15:00 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: problem with includes in src/interfaces/l Vince Vielhaber
15:01 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
15:13 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: problem with includes in src/interfaces/l Bruce Momjian
15:32 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: problem with includes in src/interfaces/l Vince Vielhaber
15:37 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: problem with includes in src/interfaces/l Bruce Momjian
17:22 Re: [HACKERS] Misleading Error Message Bruce Momjian
17:23 Re: [HACKERS] Misleading Error Message Bruce Momjian
17:30 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo Bruce Momjian
21:11 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE leaks file descriptors Tom Lane

18 May 1999

00:47 Re: [HACKERS] select + order by Tatsuo Ishii
01:32 Current TODO list Bruce Momjian
02:39 Re: [HACKERS] CVS Thomas Lockhart
02:41 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo Thomas Lockhart
05:08 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Peter T Mount
09:32 spinlock freeze again Hiroshi Inoue
12:50 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Thomas Lockhart
13:35 RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Peter Mount
13:39 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Tom Lane
13:43 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Tom Lane
13:46 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Bruce Momjian
13:57 I've got it, now should I commit it? Tom Lane
14:01 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Tom Lane
14:19 Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? Bruce Momjian
14:20 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Bruce Momjian
16:33 Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? The Hermit Hacker
16:37 Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? Bruce Momjian
16:45 Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
16:55 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Michael Meskes
17:10 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Peter T Mount
20:06 I thought this was picked up ages ago? Peter T Mount
20:31 Q: Features of 6.5 Hannu Krosing
20:47 Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? Tom Lane
21:01 Re: [HACKERS] I thought this was picked up ages ago? Bruce Momjian
21:16 DEFAULT '' problem Bruce Momjian
21:16 Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? Bruce Momjian
22:16 Re: [HACKERS] I thought this was picked up ages ago? Peter T Mount
23:00 Re: [HACKERS] I thought this was picked up ages ago? Bruce Momjian

19 May 1999

03:07 Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? Tom Lane
03:10 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Thomas Lockhart
05:05 Re: [HACKERS] I thought this was picked up ages ago? Peter T Mount
09:07 RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Hiroshi Inoue
10:36 Re: [HACKERS] Some progress on INSERT/SELECT/GROUP BY bugs ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
10:52 PyGreSQL 2.4 D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
11:02 PyGreSQL 2.4 darcy@druid.net ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain)
11:11 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tatsuo Ishii
11:17 Re: [HACKERS] sgmr* vs. md* ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
11:25 Re: [HACKERS] PyGreSQL 2.4 Hannu Krosing
11:38 Re: [HACKERS] PyGreSQL 2.4 D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
12:01 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
12:05 Re: [HACKERS] I thought this was picked up ages ago? Thomas Lockhart
12:21 Off topic - ref spreadsheet Wayne
12:25 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
12:46 Broken select on regular expression !!! Constantin Teodorescu
12:52 Re: [SQL] Oddities with NULL and GROUP BY Herouth Maoz
12:53 Re: [HACKERS] PyGreSQL 2.4 The Hermit Hacker
13:00 Re: [HACKERS] PyGreSQL 2.4 D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
13:34 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Tom Lane
13:43 Re: [HACKERS] PyGreSQL 2.4 The Hermit Hacker
13:46 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Oddities with NULL and GROUP BY Tom Lane
13:47 Re: [HACKERS] PyGreSQL 2.4 The Hermit Hacker
14:09 Re: [HACKERS] Some progress on INSERT/SELECT/GROUP BY bugs jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:15 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Michael Meskes
14:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Oddities with NULL and GROUP BY Thomas Lockhart
14:16 Last call for docs Thomas Lockhart
14:29 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Oddities with NULL and GROUP BY secret
14:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Oddities with NULL and GROUP BY Herouth Maoz
14:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Oddities with NULL and GROUP BY Herouth Maoz
15:25 Re: [HACKERS] Off topic - ref spreadsheet Bruce Momjian
15:25 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
15:32 Re: [HACKERS] PyGreSQL 2.4 Bruce Momjian
15:32 Re: [HACKERS] sgmr* vs. md* Bruce Momjian
15:35 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
15:52 remove an address from your mailing lists Sean Rouse
16:31 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
16:36 Re: [HACKERS] Some progress on INSERT/SELECT/GROUP BY bugs ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
17:31 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
18:50 default operator class for user-defined types D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
18:52 default operator class for user-defined types darcy@druid.net ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain)
19:22 Looking for Mr. Autonum E Westfield
19:41 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
19:49 Re: [GENERAL] Looking for Mr. Autonum Charles Tassell
22:00 Re: [HACKERS] Last call for docs Tom Lane

20 May 1999

02:52 Re: [HACKERS] Last call for docs Thomas Lockhart
03:28 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Thomas Lockhart
05:58 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
08:31 drop user doesn't remove rights from tables ... David Sauer
10:09 RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list The Hermit Hacker
11:15 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
12:08 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
12:13 It is doing my head in Blyth A J C (Comp)
12:15 Re: [HACKERS] Last call for docs Tom Lane
12:19 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
12:30 Re: [HACKERS] Off topic - ref spreadsheet Cary O'Brien
12:30 Re: [HACKERS] It is doing my head in ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
12:41 Re: [HACKERS] It is doing my head in jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
12:58 Re: [HACKERS] It is doing my head in Tom Lane
13:58 Blowing core - anyone have any ideas? Vince Vielhaber
14:51 Postgres 6.4.2 connection problem Andy Farrell
15:58 Trigger - Rewrite question with 6.5beta Marcus Mascari
16:04 PL installation jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
16:14 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.4.2 connection problem Tom Lane
16:27 Re: [HACKERS] Trigger - Rewrite question with 6.5beta jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:06 Re: [HACKERS] Blowing core - anyone have any ideas? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:15 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.4.2 connection problem solved Andy Farrell
18:32 Re: [HACKERS] Blowing core - anyone have any ideas? Vince Vielhaber
18:54 64 bit version on Solaris 7... Matthew C. Aycock
20:11 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.4.2 connection problem solved Tom Lane
20:16 Re: [HACKERS] 64 bit version on Solaris 7... Tom Lane
20:54 Makefile Patch Brian P Millett
21:19 Re: [HACKERS] Makefile Patch Bruce Momjian
23:12 RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Hiroshi Inoue

21 May 1999

00:58 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Tatsuo Ishii
01:51 Cache lookup failed D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
01:52 Cache lookup failed darcy@druid.net ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain)
02:21 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Tom Lane
02:33 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Bruce Momjian
02:33 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Bruce Momjian
03:32 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Bruce Momjian
03:40 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Bruce Momjian
04:04 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Tatsuo Ishii
04:08 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Tatsuo Ishii
04:16 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Don Baccus
05:02 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Bruce Momjian
05:03 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Bruce Momjian
05:19 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Tatsuo Ishii
08:58 ERROR: WaitOnLock: error on wakeup - Aborting this transaction Tatsuo Ishii
10:20 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: WaitOnLock: error on wakeup - Aborting this transaction Vadim Mikheev
10:33 Numeric and Aggregate: transform node 107 Michael Contzen
11:56 RE: [HACKERS] web site addition Dmitry Samersoff
12:07 Empty system tables D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
12:09 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Thomas Lockhart
12:12 Empty system tables darcy@druid.net ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain)
12:29 [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: views doesn't survives after pg_dump (fwd) Oleg Bartunov
13:02 Re: [HACKERS] Numeric and Aggregate: transform node 107 Tom Lane
14:07 Re: [HACKERS] Empty system tables Tom Lane
14:48 Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! Bruce Momjian
15:52 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Ole Gjerde
16:53 Doesn't compile Ole Gjerde
18:01 Re: [HACKERS] Doesn't compile Bruce Momjian
19:34 strange behavior of UPDATE Edmund Mergl
20:02 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Tom Lane
20:16 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Bruce Momjian
20:37 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: views doesn't survives after pg_dump (fwd) Keith Parks

22 May 1999

01:55 ddd and postgres prompt Bruce Momjian
02:22 Re: [HACKERS] ddd and postgres prompt Bruce Momjian
03:09 DEFAULT fixed Bruce Momjian
03:11 DEFAULT '' fixed Bruce Momjian
03:39 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Edmund Mergl
04:08 fix for SELECT 1; SELECT 2 fails when sent not via psql, semicolon problem Bruce Momjian
06:00 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Edmund Mergl
06:11 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Bruce Momjian
13:46 Re: [HACKERS] DEFAULT fixed Tom Lane
22:50 Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Tom Lane
23:46 Sequence nexvtal() and initdb/pg_proc problem Ole Gjerde

23 May 1999

00:01 Re: [HACKERS] DEFAULT fixed Bruce Momjian
00:06 Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) Bruce Momjian
00:12 Re: [HACKERS] DEFAULT fixed Bruce Momjian
04:55 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Vadim Mikheev
06:43 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Oleg Bartunov
07:04 Outer joins Kaare Rasmussen
11:04 createlang - ? Vadim Mikheev
13:49 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: WaitOnLock: error on wakeup - Aborting this transaction Tatsuo Ishii
15:32 Re: [HACKERS] DEFAULT fixed Tom Lane
15:52 Could anyone tell me what tis news-group is about? eV!L (John)
17:07 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Tom Lane
17:51 Wisconsin -B parameter Bruce Momjian
20:46 Partial fix for INSERT...SELECT problems Tom Lane
21:17 Re: [HACKERS] Sequence nexvtal() and initdb/pg_proc problem Tom Lane
22:00 Re: [HACKERS] DEFAULT fixed Tom Lane
23:19 RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Hiroshi Inoue
23:45 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Tom Lane

24 May 1999

02:33 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Bruce Momjian
02:57 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: WaitOnLock: error on wakeup - Aborting this transaction Vadim Mikheev
03:10 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: WaitOnLock: error on wakeup - Aborting this transaction Tatsuo Ishii
03:42 RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list Hiroshi Inoue
04:23 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Oleg Bartunov
05:57 Vacuum/mdtruncate() (was: RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list) Ole Gjerde
06:03 Re: [HACKERS] Sequence nexvtal() and initdb/pg_proc problem Ole Gjerde
06:56 Re: Vacuum/mdtruncate() (was: RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list) Vadim Mikheev
08:47 RE: Vacuum/mdtruncate() (was: RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list) Hiroshi Inoue
12:48 Re: [HACKERS] DEFAULT fixed Thomas Lockhart
13:02 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: WaitOnLock: error on wakeup - Aborting this transaction Bruce Momjian
13:04 Re: [HACKERS] Outer joins Thomas Lockhart
13:12 Updated 6.5 HISTORY Bruce Momjian
14:02 Re: [HACKERS] DEFAULT fixed Bruce Momjian
14:02 Re: [HACKERS] DEFAULT fixed Bruce Momjian
14:02 Article for Daemon News Bruce Momjian
14:02 Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
14:06 Re: [HACKERS] Updated 6.5 HISTORY Thomas Lockhart
14:14 Outer joins Kaare Rasmussen
15:00 Re: [HACKERS] Updated 6.5 HISTORY Oleg Bartunov
15:52 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
15:56 Re: [HACKERS] Updated 6.5 HISTORY D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
16:58 RE: Vacuum/mdtruncate() (was: RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list) Ole Gjerde
17:34 Problem in S_LOCK? Keith Parks
17:39 Re: [HACKERS] Article for Daemon News Daniel Lundin
20:04 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: views doesn't survives after pg_dump (fwd) Keith Parks
20:31 Re: [HACKERS] Article for Daemon News Bruce Momjian
20:31 Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump core dumps Bruce Momjian
20:31 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
20:33 Re: [HACKERS] Problem in S_LOCK? Bruce Momjian
20:56 Re: [HACKERS] Article for Daemon News Jeff MacDonald
21:06 pgindent Bruce Momjian
21:10 6.5 HISTORY file Bruce Momjian
21:13 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Edmund Mergl
23:20 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Tom Lane
23:28 Re: [HACKERS] Updated 6.5 HISTORY Tom Lane
23:31 Re: [HACKERS] Problem in S_LOCK? Tom Lane

25 May 1999

00:45 Re: [HACKERS] Article for Daemon News Thomas Lockhart
01:17 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Tom Lane
02:18 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
02:22 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items darcy@druid.net ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain)
03:00 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
03:00 INET type and 00/0 Bruce Momjian
03:03 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items maillist@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian)
04:12 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Edmund Mergl
04:29 Fix for INET 00/0 Bruce Momjian
04:43 SQL92 Kaare Rasmussen
06:19 Re: [HACKERS] createlang - ? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
06:27 Re: [HACKERS] createlang - ? Vadim Mikheev
06:45 Re: [HACKERS] createlang - ? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
07:16 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: views doesn't survives after pg_dump (fwd) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
08:08 Re: [HACKERS] Partial fix for INSERT...SELECT problems jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
09:04 6.5 cvs: can't drop table Oleg Bartunov
09:22 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: can't drop table Oleg Bartunov
09:59 Compile woes on AIX 432 for v6.5 David R. Favor
12:03 JDBC problem in the docs Peter T Mount
12:16 Call for updates! Thomas Lockhart
12:26 Re: [HACKERS] JDBC problem in the docs Thomas Lockhart
12:48 Re: [HACKERS] Heads up: does RULES regress test still work for you? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
12:52 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Tom Lane
12:55 Re: [HACKERS] createlang - ? Tom Lane
13:02 Re: [HACKERS] Partial fix for INSERT...SELECT problems Tom Lane
13:15 unsubscribe pgsql-hackers Wheeler, Alfred
13:18 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: can't drop table Tom Lane
13:38 Re: [HACKERS] Heads up: does RULES regress test still work for you? Tom Lane
13:42 INSERT INTO view means what exactly? Tom Lane
14:04 create index updates nrows statistics ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
14:12 Re: [HACKERS] createlang - ? Vadim Mikheev
14:18 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: can't drop table Oleg Bartunov
14:24 Re: [HACKERS] Call for updates! Bruce Momjian
14:24 AW: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: can't drop table ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
14:27 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: can't drop table Bruce Momjian
14:27 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: can't drop table Bruce Momjian
14:52 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO view means what exactly? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
15:54 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: can't drop table Oleg Bartunov
16:35 Problem with nightly snapshot naming David R. Favor
16:55 Re: [HACKERS] Call for updates! The Hermit Hacker
17:04 pg_dump core dump, upgrading from 6.5b1 to 5/24 snapshot Ari Halberstadt
17:06 Re: create index updates nrows statistics ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
17:37 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: WaitOnLock: error on wakeup - Aborting this transaction Vadim Mikheev
17:39 AW: [HACKERS] pg_dump core dump, upgrading from 6.5b1 to 5/24 sna pshot ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
17:46 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Edmund Mergl
17:49 Re: [HACKERS] create index updates nrows statistics Tom Lane
17:54 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO view means what exactly? Tom Lane
18:01 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump core dump, upgrading from 6.5b1 to 5/24 snapshot Tom Lane
18:17 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Tom Lane
18:23 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO view means what exactly? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
18:25 Re: AW: [HACKERS] pg_dump core dump, upgrading from 6.5b1 to 5/24 sna pshot Ari Halberstadt
18:26 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump core dump, upgrading from 6.5b1 to 5/24 snapshot Ari Halberstadt
18:44 I can't compile cvs snapshot ... David Sauer
18:53 Re: [HACKERS] I can't compile cvs snapshot ... Bruce Momjian
19:21 Re: [HACKERS] Call for updates! Hannu Krosing
20:25 Re: [HACKERS] Problem in S_LOCK? Keith Parks
20:32 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Edmund Mergl
20:49 Re: [HACKERS] I can't compile cvs snapshot ... Bruce Momjian
20:54 Re: supported platform list Andrew Merrill
21:04 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump core dump, upgrading from 6.5b1 to 5/24 snapshot Tom Lane
21:51 Re: [HACKERS] Call for updates! Oliver Elphick
23:39 Re: [HACKERS] Problem in S_LOCK? Thomas A. Szybist

26 May 1999

00:17 Re: [HACKERS] I can't compile cvs snapshot ... Tatsuo Ishii
01:05 Re: supported platform list Thomas Lockhart
01:07 v6.5 under FreeBSD ... The Hermit Hacker
01:49 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Vadim Mikheev
01:50 Re: [HACKERS] I can't compile cvs snapshot ... Bruce Momjian
03:03 Re: [HACKERS] I can't compile cvs snapshot ... Tatsuo Ishii
03:09 pg_dump inconsistences Vadim Mikheev
03:15 Re: Vacuum/mdtruncate() (was: RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list) Vadim Mikheev
03:16 Re: [HACKERS] I can't compile cvs snapshot ... Bruce Momjian
03:34 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump inconsistences Bruce Momjian
03:55 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump inconsistences Vadim Mikheev
03:57 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump inconsistences Bruce Momjian
04:10 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump core dump, upgrading from 6.5b1 to 5/24 snapshot Ari Halberstadt
04:13 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump inconsistences Don Baccus
04:14 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump inconsistences Don Baccus
05:07 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: WaitOnLock: error on wakeup - Aborting this transaction Tatsuo Ishii
05:34 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: WaitOnLock: error on wakeup - Aborting this transaction Vadim Mikheev
06:26 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
06:29 AW: [HACKERS] create index updates nrows statistics ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
06:43 Re: AW: [HACKERS] create index updates nrows statistics jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
07:00 AW: AW: [HACKERS] create index updates nrows statistics ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
07:25 6.5 cvs: weird crashes Oleg Bartunov
09:06 AW: [HACKERS] Call for updates! ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
11:08 Help: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
11:14 Help: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed darcy@druid.net ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain)
12:11 Memory leak in large objects (was Re: Postgreqsl Large Objects) Peter T Mount
12:28 report for Win32 port Horak Daniel
12:39 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Tom Lane
12:44 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE Tom Lane
12:49 Re: [HACKERS] Help: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
12:57 Re: [HACKERS] I can't compile cvs snapshot ... Tom Lane
13:00 Re: [HACKERS] I can't compile cvs snapshot ... Bruce Momjian
13:20 Re: [HACKERS] Memory leak in large objects (was Re: Postgreqsl Large Objects) Tom Lane
14:07 Re: [HACKERS] Help: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed Tom Lane
14:08 Re: [HACKERS] I can't compile cvs snapshot ... Bruce Momjian
14:30 Re: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port Vince Vielhaber
15:11 Re: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port Bruce Momjian
16:32 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump core dump, upgrading from 6.5b1 to 5/24 snapshot Ari Halberstadt
16:34 Re: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:46 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump core dump, upgrading from 6.5b1 to 5/24 snapshot Tom Lane
18:49 NUMERIC regression test? Bruce Momjian
18:57 Numeric precision on psql \d Bruce Momjian
19:26 Uh oh? Vince Vielhaber
19:30 Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
19:38 Re: [HACKERS] Uh oh? Bruce Momjian
19:41 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump core dump, upgrading from 6.5b1 to 5/24 snapshot Ari Halberstadt
19:44 plpgsql compile Bruce Momjian
20:00 Re: [HACKERS] Problem in S_LOCK? Keith Parks
20:08 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC regression test? Tom Lane
20:10 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC regression test? Bruce Momjian
21:19 Re: AW: [HACKERS] create index updates nrows statistics Tom Lane
21:25 Uh-oh II - ecpg Vince Vielhaber
22:07 Re: [HACKERS] Uh oh? Vince Vielhaber
23:10 Re: [HACKERS] Uh-oh II - ecpg Bruce Momjian
23:10 Re: [HACKERS] Re: create index updates nrows statistics Bruce Momjian
23:16 Re: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port Vince Vielhaber
23:42 Re: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port Tom Lane
23:50 Re: [HACKERS] Problem in S_LOCK? Thomas A. Szybist
23:57 Re: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port Vince Vielhaber

27 May 1999

01:20 Re: [HACKERS] Help: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
01:21 Re: [HACKERS] Help: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
02:44 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 under FreeBSD ... Thomas Lockhart
02:48 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 under FreeBSD ... Vadim Mikheev
03:10 Re: patch for pgsql password Bruce Momjian
03:10 Re: [HACKERS] Help: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed Tom Lane
06:37 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
06:45 Re: [HACKERS] create index updates nrows statistics ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
07:28 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC regression test? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
07:31 Makefile of libpq++ ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5
07:51 RE: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port Horak Daniel
08:25 Re: [HACKERS] Help: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
10:06 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 under FreeBSD ... The Hermit Hacker
10:17 Re: [HACKERS] Help: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
11:42 Re: [HACKERS] Uh-oh II - ecpg Michael Meskes
11:42 Re: [HACKERS] Uh oh? Michael Meskes
12:57 Re: [HACKERS] Help: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed Tom Lane
12:58 New xindex.sgml D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
13:02 Re: [HACKERS] Uh-oh II - ecpg Tom Lane
13:05 New xindex.sgml darcy@druid.net ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain)
13:16 Re: [HACKERS] New xindex.sgml Thomas Lockhart
13:28 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
13:29 Re: [HACKERS] Makefile of libpq++ Bruce Momjian
13:50 Re: [HACKERS] Uh-oh II - ecpg Vince Vielhaber
14:08 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Vince Vielhaber
15:01 Release date and docs Thomas Lockhart
15:11 Re: Release date and docs Bruce Momjian
15:23 pg_dump ACL's Bruce Momjian
15:32 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Thomas Lockhart
15:33 Re: Release date and docs Thomas Lockhart
16:32 Re: [HACKERS] Release date and docs Tom Lane
16:45 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
16:54 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
18:25 Problems w/ LO Brandon Palmer
18:44 RE: [HACKERS] Problems w/ LO Vince Vielhaber
19:40 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
19:59 Port for SGI Irix using today's snapshot. Robert Bruccoleri
20:34 Ye olde "relation doesn't quite exist" problem Tom Lane
21:35 refint (& others?) on current snapshot Nat Howard
21:42 nonblocking lock? Pablo Funes

28 May 1999

01:39 Re: [HACKERS] Problems w/ LO Tatsuo Ishii
03:46 Proposed article on PostgreSQL development Bruce Momjian
03:58 Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
03:59 Port for SGI Irix using today's snapshot.
03:59 Port for SGI Irix using today's snapshot.
04:20 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tatsuo Ishii
05:09 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
06:23 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
09:34 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Vadim Mikheev
10:17 pg_dump doesn't work well with large object ... David Sauer
11:59 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Release date and docs The Hermit Hacker
13:11 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
13:23 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
14:07 Re: [HACKERS] Ye olde "relation doesn't quite exist" problem Bruce Momjian
14:15 Development History article Bruce Momjian
14:15 illegal page faults. . . JT Kirkpatrick
15:51 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Release date and docs Vince Vielhaber
15:53 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Release date and docs Bruce Momjian
15:56 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Release date and docs The Hermit Hacker
16:03 PostgreSQL article Bruce Momjian
17:06 Performance problem partially identified Tom Lane
17:34 Re: [HACKERS] Ye olde "relation doesn't quite exist" problem Tom Lane
17:42 Re: [HACKERS] Ye olde "relation doesn't quite exist" problem Bruce Momjian
20:14 Re: [HACKERS] Performance problem partially identified Hannu Krosing
22:09 Re: Performance problem partially identified Tom Lane

29 May 1999

01:25 Re: [HACKERS] Problems w/ LO Tatsuo Ishii
03:55 Re: [HACKERS] Performance problem partially identified Vadim Mikheev
03:58 Re: [HACKERS] Performance problem partially identified Vadim Mikheev
04:10 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Performance problem partially identified Vadim Mikheev
04:23 Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/storage/buffer bufmgr.c' Vadim Mikheev
04:31 Re: [HACKERS] Performance problem partially identified Bruce Momjian
04:58 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Vadim Mikheev
05:38 Re: [HACKERS] Outer joins Kaare Rasmussen
11:07 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
14:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/storage/buffer bufmgr.c' Tom Lane
14:29 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
14:48 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
17:08 Daemon News article Bruce Momjian
17:56 Mariposa commericalized by Stonebraker Bruce Momjian
18:46 History of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
19:36 shtml file names Bruce Momjian
21:02 Re: [HACKERS] Daemon News article Henry B. Hotz
21:17 Re: [HACKERS] Daemon News article Todd Graham Lewis
21:28 Re: [HACKERS] Daemon News article Bruce Momjian
21:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/storage/buffer bufmgr.c' The Hermit Hacker
21:51 Re: [HACKERS] Daemon News article Henry B. Hotz
21:59 Re: [HACKERS] Daemon News article Bruce Momjian
22:32 Re: [HACKERS] Daemon News article Henry B. Hotz
22:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/storage/bufferbufmgr.c' Henry B. Hotz

30 May 1999

00:37 Re: [HACKERS] Daemon News article Bruce Momjian
06:01 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa commericalized by Stonebraker Hannu Krosing
11:14 Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL Vadim Mikheev
11:28 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa commericalized by Stonebraker Vadim Mikheev
13:06 Backends waiting, spinlocks, shared mem patches Wayne Piekarski
14:03 Re: [HACKERS] Daemon News article Tom Lane
14:47 egcs experimentation results Tom Lane
17:51 Re: [HACKERS] egcs experimentation results Oleg Bartunov
18:27 Re: [HACKERS] Daemon News article Bruce Momjian
19:01 Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
23:07 Re: [HACKERS] Daemon News article The Hermit Hacker
23:25 Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
23:30 RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Hiroshi Inoue

31 May 1999

00:27 Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
00:32 RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Hiroshi Inoue
00:34 Colin McCormack
00:45 Announcement - SWIG based tcl interface (with asynch query) Colin McCormack
00:45 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Vadim Mikheev
00:55 Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL Vadim Mikheev
01:07 Announcement - SWIG based tcl interface (with asynch query) Colin McCormack
01:09 Announcement - SWIG based tcl interface (with asynch query) Colin McCormack
01:17 Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
01:17 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
01:18 Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
01:44 RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Hiroshi Inoue
02:40 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
04:55 RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Hiroshi Inoue
05:14 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian
06:37 Re: [HACKERS] egcs experimentation results Dmitry Samersoff
06:42 select count(*) from : 0 rows or 1 rows ? Oleg Bartunov
06:59 Backend sent 0x45 type while idle Trever Adams
07:06 Backend sent 0x45 type while idle Trever Adams
07:24 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tatsuo Ishii
08:37 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Vadim Mikheev
11:19 Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
11:21 Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
11:29 Re: [HACKERS] select count(*) from : 0 rows or 1 rows ? D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
11:44 RE: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port Horak Daniel
13:57 Re: [HACKERS] Backends waiting, spinlocks, shared mem patches Tom Lane
14:04 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
14:12 Re: [HACKERS] Backend sent 0x45 type while idle Tom Lane
14:19 RE: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port Horak Daniel
14:24 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
14:45 Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL Cary O'Brien
14:46 New IP address datatype Mark Volpe
15:20 Re: [HACKERS] select count(*) from : 0 rows or 1 rows ? Bruce Momjian
15:20 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype Bruce Momjian
15:21 Re: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port Bruce Momjian
15:21 Re: [HACKERS] Backend sent 0x45 type while idle Bruce Momjian
16:08 please? Pablo Funes
16:14 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
16:23 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype Tom Lane
16:36 Re: [HACKERS] please? Tom Lane
16:45 Re: [HACKERS] please? Bruce Momjian
17:05 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
17:07 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype Mark Volpe
17:31 Re: [HACKERS] please? Theo Kramer
17:35 Re: [HACKERS] please? Pablo Funes
17:44 Re: [HACKERS] please? Bruce Momjian
17:46 Re: [HACKERS] please? Bruce Momjian
17:57 Re: [HACKERS] please? Theo Kramer
18:01 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Tom Lane
18:05 Re: [HACKERS] please? Pablo Funes
18:11 Re: [HACKERS] please? Bruce Momjian
18:23 Re: [HACKERS] Backend sent 0x45 type while idle Trever Adams
18:24 Re: [HACKERS] Backend sent 0x45 type while idle Trever Adams
18:27 Re: [HACKERS] please? Bruce Momjian
18:27 Re: [HACKERS] please? Pablo Funes
18:40 Re: s_lock_stuck (was Problems w/ LO) Tom Lane
19:01 Re: [HACKERS] please? Theo Kramer
19:02 Re: [HACKERS] Backend sent 0x45 type while idle Tom Lane
19:04 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype The Hermit Hacker
19:13 Re: [HACKERS] please? Bruce Momjian
19:45 Re: [HACKERS] please? Keith Parks
20:26 Re: [HACKERS] Problems w/ LO Tom Lane
20:40 Re: [HACKERS] Problems w/ LO Bruce Momjian
22:02 Re: [HACKERS] Problems w/ LO Brandon Palmer
22:30 Re: [HACKERS] please? Bruce Momjian
22:40 Re: [HACKERS] please? Pablo Funes
22:51 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
22:52 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
22:53 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
23:07 Re: [HACKERS] please? Tom Lane
23:08 Re: [HACKERS] please? Bruce Momjian
23:08 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
23:10 Re: [HACKERS] please? Pablo Funes
23:15 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype Tom Lane
23:19 which list? Vince Vielhaber
23:28 Re: [HACKERS] which list? Bruce Momjian
23:35 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype Tom Lane
23:46 IRC meeting Bruce Momjian
23:46 Re: [HACKERS] which list? Tom Lane
23:57 Re: [HACKERS] which list? Vince Vielhaber