Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name?
Date
Msg-id 199905101646.MAA07734@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name?  (Ulf Mehlig <umehlig@uni-bremen.de>)
List pgsql-hackers

Sorry, I can't reproduce this here on 6.5beta.


> 
> Could there be a bug in the 'cluster' command in postgreSQL 6.4? If I
> try to cluster a table with a name with more than 8 characters, psql
> says:
> 
>   xxx=> create table x123456789 (xxx text);
>   CREATE
>   xxx=> create index x123 on x123456789 (xxx);
>   CREATE
>   xxx=> cluster x123 on x123456789;
>   ERROR:  Relation x1234567  Does Not Exist!
> 
> If I try this repeatedly, I get:
> 
>   xxx=> cluster x123 on x123456789;
>   ERROR:  temp_66c31 relation already exists     
> 
> I'm running PostgreSQL 6.4(.0) on i386 Linux (2.2.6). Please excuse if
> I overlooked something in the docs!
> 
> Bye, Ulf
> 
> -- 
> ======================================================================
> Ulf Mehlig    <umehlig@zmt.uni-bremen.de>
>               Center for Tropical Marine Ecology/ZMT, Bremen, Germany
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "op must return bool to be used with subquery"?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2?