Re: [HACKERS] Beta2? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Beta2?
Date
Msg-id 7697.926354807@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Beta2?  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Beta2?  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
>>>>>>> o It is repoted that NetBSD/m68k has bee broken since you put the
>>>>>>> alignment stuff into configure, I'm not sure though.
>>
>> Hmm.  What numbers is configure producing for the various ALIGNOF
>> values?  (Look in config.h.)

> #define ALIGNOF_SHORT 2
> #define ALIGNOF_INT 2
> #define ALIGNOF_LONG 2
> #define ALIGNOF_LONG_LONG_INT 2
> #define ALIGNOF_DOUBLE 2
> #define MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF 2 

OK, I guess that's reasonable for m68k hardware.  I wonder whether
anything is assuming that MAXALIGN is at least 4...

>> What exactly happens when you try a
>> createdb?  Can you connect to the template1 database and do SQL stuff
>> after initdb, without having done a createdb?

> "psql template1" gets coredumped. But 6.4.2 clients can connect to the
> backend. Seems something going wrong with libpq stuffs.

Do you mean that psql itself (not the backend) is coredumping?  Can you
provide a backtrace from the corefile?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A select with aggretion is failing, still subtle problems with aggregation