Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ulf Mehlig
Subject Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name?
Date
Msg-id 199905101638.SAA10967@pandora3.localnet
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>:
> Sorry, I can't reproduce this here on 6.5beta.

Why sorry? I'm happy if it doesn't appear in 6.5 ;-) But then, could
there be a misconfiguration or something like that in my 6.4(.0)
database, or could it be that the problem silently disappeared on the
way between 6.4 and 6.5? (I'm not moving to 6.5 beta because I have to
finish my theses, and nearly all the data is under postgreSQL ...)

Thank you anyway for your answer (and for postgreSQL ;-)

regards,
Ulf


----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Could there be a bug in the 'cluster' command in postgreSQL 6.4? If I
> try to cluster a table with a name with more than 8 characters, psql
> says:
> 
>   xxx=> create table x123456789 (xxx text);
>   CREATE
>   xxx=> create index x123 on x123456789 (xxx);
>   CREATE
>   xxx=> cluster x123 on x123456789;
>   ERROR:  Relation x1234567  Does Not Exist!

-- 
======================================================================
Ulf Mehlig    <umehlig@zmt.uni-bremen.de>             Center for Tropical Marine Ecology/ZMT, Bremen, Germany
----------------------------------------------------------------------


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE leaks file descriptors
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem?