Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem?
Date
Msg-id 199905101724.NAA09025@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dump problem?  (Chris Bitmead <chris.bitmead@bigfoot.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Added to TODO list.



> 
> Am I right in saying that the -o and -D arguments to pg_dump cannot work
> together? Any chance of this getting fixed?
> 
> Otherwise is there any other way of deleting a column from a table
> whilst retaining oids? In general there seems there are problems with
> various scheme changes that you may want to do if you need to retain
> oids. Various SELECT INTO options don't work any more unless there is
> some way to set the oid in conjunction with named fields (like the -D
> option).
> 
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ulf Mehlig
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604