Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> As far as I see,different entries in xidHash have a same key when above
> case occurs. Moreover xidHash has been in abnormal state since the
> number of xidHash entries exceeded 256.
>
> Is this bug solved by change maxBackends->NLOCKENTS(maxBackends)
> by Vadim or the change about hash by Tom ?
Should be fixed now.
>
> As for my test case,xidHash is filled with XactLockTable entries which have
> been acquired by XactLockTableWait().
> Could those entries be released immediately after they are acquired ?
Ops. Thanks! Must be released.
Vadim
