Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error
Date
Msg-id 25118.926522452@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
>> Perhaps this could be driven by a configuration switch?

>     Or maybe some switch to initdb and createdb?

That's a good idea; it would save having to propagate the value out of
configure and into the places where it'd be needed.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu (Ross J. Reedstrom)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Date/Time Flaw in pg_dump ?
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] defalut value