Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem
Date
Msg-id 199905150859.EAA11308@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> > you can specify any option begins from --with-
> > configure will not complain about unknown option, just silently ignore it.
> 
> This has always been true with every version of autoconf --- it's one of
> the less well designed aspects of autoconf IMHO.  The GNU folk claim
> it's a feature, but I don't think so... (*)
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> (*) their reasoning is that you can pass the same set of --with flags
> to every configure script in a large source tree without worrying about
> exactly which packages want which options.  Perhaps that really is
> useful for building a ton of GNU tools together, but it sure hurts
> user-friendliness otherwise.

I totally agree.  If they had an option to disregard unknown options
that would be OK, but never to make it the default.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: problem with includes in src/interfaces/libpq++/