Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem
Date
Msg-id 15198.926693164@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to configure --with-xxxx problem  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> you can specify any option begins from --with-
> configure will not complain about unknown option, just silently ignore it.

This has always been true with every version of autoconf --- it's one of
the less well designed aspects of autoconf IMHO.  The GNU folk claim
it's a feature, but I don't think so... (*)
        regards, tom lane

(*) their reasoning is that you can pass the same set of --with flags
to every configure script in a large source tree without worrying about
exactly which packages want which options.  Perhaps that really is
useful for building a ton of GNU tools together, but it sure hurts
user-friendliness otherwise.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS
Next
From: Maarten Boekhold
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem