Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list
Date
Msg-id 199905181519.LAA27032@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >>>> * change the library/backend interface to use network byte order
> >> 
> >> Is there something I'm missing?  This has been true for a long while...
> >
> > People have mentioned we should make the change, but it will require a
> > new protocol, so it hasn't moved from the list.
> 
> But my point is the current protocol *already* uses network byte order.

Oh.  Item removed.

> IIRC the old "version 0" protocol did not, but that's ancient history.
> Either this complaint is long obsolete, or I don't understand what's
> being asked for.

I think you are right.  Someone added code to serve both orders based on
the version of the client, I think, and newer clients use the proper
order.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it?
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it?