Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list
Date
Msg-id 19335.927039619@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>>>> * change the library/backend interface to use network byte order
>> 
>> Is there something I'm missing?  This has been true for a long while...
>
> People have mentioned we should make the change, but it will require a
> new protocol, so it hasn't moved from the list.

But my point is the current protocol *already* uses network byte order.

IIRC the old "version 0" protocol did not, but that's ancient history.
Either this complaint is long obsolete, or I don't understand what's
being asked for.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: I've got it, now should I commit it?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it?