> >> >Again very clear, and caused by the indexing of regex's, as you suggest.
> >> >I can easily look for '|' in the string, and skip the optimization. Is
> >> >that the only special case I need to add?
> >>
> >> What about '{' ?
> >
> >Does it understand {? Man, what kind of regex library do we have?
>
> I vaguely recall that we used to support only "basic" regex. At least
> I thought so. Now looking into the source, I found we have supported
> "extended" regex. FYI, our regex routines definitely supprt '{'. See
> backend/regex/re_format.7.
>
> P.S. I will commit a small regex test program under
> backend/regex for the testing purpose.
I have just commited a fix to skip {} too.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
