Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load
Date
Msg-id 6083.925945783@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> It's interesting, that process with pid 701 migrates from 
> (postmaster) to postgres with normal ps output !

Yes, that's pretty strong evidence in favor of my theory (that these
processes are just new backends that haven't received a command yet).

I'm surprised that it takes so long for your test clients to issue their
first commands --- is the test load *that* high, or do you have a
deliberate delay in there?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: silvia_brown@usa.net
Date:
Subject: adv: Important Psychic Message For You...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with function indexing