Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru> writes:
>> I suspect that huge INIT_TABLE_SIZE prevented dynamic expanding the
>> hash tables and seems there's something wrong in the routines
>> responsible for that.
> Seems like that -:(
OK, as the last guy to touch dynahash.c I suppose this is my
bailiwick... I will look into it today.
> If we'll not fix expand hash code before 6.5 release then
> I would recommend to don't use INIT_TABLE_SIZE in
If we can't figure out what's really wrong then that might be
a good kluge solution to get 6.5 out the door. But I'd rather
try to fix it right first.
Can anyone send me a test case script that reproduces the problem?
regards, tom lane
