Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL + PRIMARY KEY = redundant indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL + PRIMARY KEY = redundant indexes
Date
Msg-id 3738568D.A2CF348F@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to SERIAL + PRIMARY KEY = redundant indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
fwiw, there is this comment in the code:
* Note that this code does not currently look for all possible
redundant cases*  and either ignore or stop with warning. The create might fail
later when*  names for indices turn out to be duplicated, or a user might have
specified*  extra useless indices which might hurt performance. - thomas
1997-12-08

But I should (probably) be able to fix this particular case.
                       - Tom

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604