> Who needs the pretty printed output of nodeDisplay() ?
>
> I find the output of nodeToString() much more useful when
> debugging the rewrite system (especially when looking at
> querytree's resulting from joins with many RTE's, Resdom's,
> TLE's plus qual, group by etc. clauses. It's hard to keep
> track where I am if the entire tree spans hundreds of lines.
>
> Thus I would like to change the output of -d4 back to that of
> nodeToString(). Anyone against?
I like the long pretty printing, with the indentation. You are
suggesting going to the more compressed format. Can we have -d4 do
compressed printing, and -d5 to pretty printing? That would be good.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
