On Wed, 19 May 1999, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
> > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 11:41 PM
> > To: Peter T Mount
> > Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list
> >
> >
> > Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk> writes:
> > > This was done (twice if I remember). The tables now split at 1G. This
> > > opened a new problem that vacuum can't handle segmented tables.
> > I have the
> > > general idea of how to fix this, but again it's time that's the problem.
> >
> > Ole Gjerde <gjerde@icebox.org> just contributed a patch for the vacuum
> > problem. Perhaps you at least have time to check his patch?
> >
>
> I wonder that no one but me object to the patch.
> It may cause serious results.
How? Why? In what way? Details?
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
