Re: [HACKERS] Beta2? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Beta2?
Date
Msg-id 13395.926432406@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Beta2?  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
>> OK, I guess that's reasonable for m68k hardware.  I wonder whether
>> anything is assuming that MAXALIGN is at least 4...

> BTW, from interfaces/libpq/fe-exec.c:
>  * Requirements for correct function are:
>  * PGRESULT_ALIGN_BOUNDARY >= sizeof(pointer)
>  *        to ensure the initial pointer in a block is not overwritten.
> [snip]
> #define PGRESULT_ALIGN_BOUNDARY        MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF /* from configure */

I think you've spotted the problem, all right.  I'll see what I can do
about it...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling 6.5 cvs (Linux, gcc 2.7.2, egcs 1.12)