Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 April 1999

• 01:16   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Roland Roberts

23 April 1999

• 17:46   what are postgresql limits? valter
• 17:52   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage -> PGSQL Advocacy The Hermit Hacker
• 17:54   Re: [HACKERS] mailing list archives not updating The Hermit Hacker
• 18:06   RE: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster Vince Vielhaber
• 18:13   PostgreSQL WWW Site ... The Hermit Hacker
• 18:25   Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:31   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC Question The Hermit Hacker
• 18:31   List Archives ... The Hermit Hacker
• 18:36   ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Brian P Millett
• 18:37   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: mot_idx: cannot extend Bruce Momjian
• 18:42   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage -> PGSQL Advocacy Bruce Momjian
• 18:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Finding the "most recent" rows Bruce Momjian
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling Bruce Momjian
• 18:54   Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster Bruce Momjian
• 18:56   Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? Bruce Momjian
• 18:58   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: mot_idx: cannot extend Bruce Momjian
• 18:59   I am feeling overwhelmed Bruce Momjian
• 19:07   Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? valter
• 19:16   Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 19:40   Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 19:47   Just catching up Bruce Momjian
• 19:53   Keeping up Bruce Momjian
• 19:56   problems with time zones in JDBC Andrew Merrill
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? Bruce Momjian
• 20:27   Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Peter T Mount
• 20:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling Tom Lane

24 April 1999

• 06:29   Low Performance pourreza
• 15:09   Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster Tom Lane
• 15:10   Re: [HACKERS] Low Performance Hannu Krosing
• 16:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Tom Lane
• 21:28   [Fwd: [HACKERS] typeidTypeRelid Error] JP Rosevear
• 23:57   palloc at outer loop? Tom Lane

25 April 1999

• 07:17   Efficiency of LIMIT ? Chris Bitmead
• 17:49   Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? Adam Haberlach
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? Bruce Momjian
• 18:42   Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Ryan Bradetich
• 20:13   Functions with aggregations (i.e. group by) causes an abort Michael J Davis
• 23:47   Re: [HACKERS] Functions with aggregations (i.e. group by) causes an abort Tom Lane

26 April 1999

• 01:53   Re: [HACKERS] A patch for FATAL 1:btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:47   Re: [HACKERS] Cygwin32 fix for current Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:56   Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 05:57   Re: [HACKERS] A patch for FATAL 1:btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected Vadim Mikheev
• 06:01   AW: [HACKERS] Re: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol hand ling Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 06:46   Re: [INTERFACES] CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Oleg Bartunov
• 06:48   Re: [INTERFACES] CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Oleg Bartunov
• 08:03   decimal and numeric types José Soares
• 12:40   Re: [HACKERS] regression output The Hermit Hacker
• 12:42   psql bug ? José Soares
• 13:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Brian P Millett
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... The Hermit Hacker
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Tom Lane
• 13:59   Re: [HACKERS] psql bug ? Tom Lane
• 14:24   Re: [HACKERS] psql bug ? Bruce Momjian
• 14:47   Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:52   CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Goran Thyni
• 15:14   [Fwd: 6.5beta] Clayton Cottingham
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... The Hermit Hacker
• 17:07   Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral
• 17:14   Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral
• 17:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis
• 17:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis
• 17:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral
• 17:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral
• 17:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral
• 17:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Michael Lausch
• 17:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis
• 17:51   Quoting backticks golliher@coe.uga.edu
• 18:07   Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Ryan Bradetich
• 19:58   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Brian P Millett
• 22:10   RE: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec t distinct) Michael J Davis

27 April 1999

• 00:07   RE: Mysql comparison Vince Vielhaber
• 00:17   Number of tuples (20300) not the same as heap (20301) G. Anthony Reina
• 00:29   Re: [HACKERS] Number of tuples (20300) not the same as heap (20301) Tim Perdue
• 00:32   unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? les@MCS.COM (Leslie Mikesell)
• 01:42   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) The Hermit Hacker
• 01:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral
• 01:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis
• 02:29   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC Question Todd Graham Lewis
• 02:45   Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:51   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Tom
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 04:15   HSavage bug in Postgresql beta? Chris Bitmead
• 07:20   Re: [HACKERS] psql bug ? José Soares
• 08:10   numeric data type on 6.5 Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:37   Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 08:48   Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:59   fix for _copyUnique() Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:08   Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Chris Bitmead
• 09:18   Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Chris Bitmead
• 09:20   RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:52   Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev
• 09:53   Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and waiting for commit on a locked table in6.4.2 Vadim Mikheev
• 10:33   RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC and waiting for commit on a locked table in 6.4.2 Peter Mount
• 12:27   Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:29   Re: [GENERAL] unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' JP Rosevear
• 12:35   Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:49   TRAP: Bad Argument to Function Call Brian P Millett
• 12:53   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart
• 12:55   Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:55   Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Oleg Broytmann
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] HSavage bug in Postgresql beta? Tom Lane
• 13:29   Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec Tom Lane
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' Tatsuo Ishii
• 15:22   Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:22   Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Matthias Schmitt
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 15:49   Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Bruce Momjian
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Vince Vielhaber
• 16:07   Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Matthias Schmitt
• 16:10   Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Matthias Schmitt
• 16:16   Re: [HACKERS] Number of tuples (20300) not the same as heap (20301) G. Anthony Reina
• 18:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral
• 20:35   Issues with the latest 6.5 source Michael J Davis
• 20:46   Looking for an old LabVIEW SQL toolkit licence... J.V.
• 23:38   Re: [HACKERS] HSavage bug in Postgresql beta? Chris Bitmead

28 April 1999

• 03:00   Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev
• 03:00   Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 03:33   rule plan string too big? Brook Milligan
• 04:39   RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:01   Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Tom Lane
• 05:54   rules bug? Brook Milligan
• 06:30   EGCS becomes GCC Oleg Broytmann
• 06:46   Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Ryan Bradetich
• 06:54   Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Dmitry Samersoff
• 07:04   AW: [HACKERS] rules bug? Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 07:40   Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Oleg Bartunov
• 08:56   RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:05   Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev
• 10:12   Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev
• 11:07   v6.5 Release Date ... The Hermit Hacker
• 11:11   Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... Vince Vielhaber
• 11:31   Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... The Hermit Hacker
• 12:04   Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Cary O'Brien
• 12:05   Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal José Soares
• 13:03   Re: [HACKERS] Issues with the latest 6.5 source Tom Lane
• 13:19   Re: AW: [HACKERS] rules bug? Brook Milligan
• 14:39   rule bug again Brook Milligan
• 15:09   RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis
• 15:18   RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? The Hermit Hacker
• 17:01   RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis
• 17:02   RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis
• 18:54   Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Bruce Momjian
• 19:09   Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Theo Kramer
• 19:38   RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis
• 19:51   RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis
• 20:05   RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Vince Vielhaber
• 20:50   Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Tom Lane
• 20:56   Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Bruce Momjian
• 21:29   Re: [HACKERS] Issues with the latest 6.5 source Tom Lane

29 April 1999

• 00:30   RE: [HACKERS] Issues with the latest 6.5 source Michael J Davis
• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart
• 04:32   RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:47   Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Michael Meskes
• 04:55   FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Peter T Mount
• 05:01   Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 05:08   RE: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Michael J Davis
• 06:34   RE: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Peter Mount
• 07:32   Pg takes at least 2 hours to retrieve 7650 rows José Soares
• 07:49   Re: [HACKERS] Pg takes at least 2 hours to retrieve 7650 rows Vadim Mikheev
• 07:59   AW: [HACKERS] Pg takes at least 2 hours to retrieve 7650 rows Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 09:12   ... Atsushi Mano
• 11:29   Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev
• 12:58   Re: [SQL] LIMIT José Soares
• 13:04   Re: [SQL] LIMIT José Soares
• 13:21   Re: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Tom Lane
• 13:57   Re: [SQL] LIMIT Mark Jewiss
• 13:59   Re: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Brian P Millett
• 14:21   Help/advice/suggestions on query optimizer for a large table Martin Weinberg
• 14:25   Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart
• 15:04   Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:09   Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:15   Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... Bruce Momjian
• 15:29   Re: [HACKERS] Help/advice/suggestions on query optimizer for a large table Thomas Lockhart
• 15:40   SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Brian P Millett
• 15:54   Numeric data types (formerly "v6.5 Release Date ...") Michael J Davis
• 16:15   Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... The Hermit Hacker
• 17:12   Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Peter T Mount
• 17:13   Re: [SQL] LIMIT José Soares
• 17:27   PLpgSQL Stat Problem Andy Lewis
• 18:15   Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Brian P Millett
• 18:48   Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Massimo Dal Zotto
• 19:50   Problem with insert into select from using aggregation Michael J Davis
• 21:34   Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Tom Lane
• 21:40   Re: [HACKERS] PLpgSQL Stat Problem Tom Lane
• 22:11   RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis
• 22:23   Re: [HACKERS] PLpgSQL Stat Problem Andy Lewis
• 23:02   Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Bruce Momjian

30 April 1999

• 00:03   -T option ignored? Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:43   can't compile Vadim Mikheev
• 12:57   Re: [HACKERS] -T option ignored? Tom Lane
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage Charles C. Bennett, Jr.
• 14:00   Mailing list 'relay' sites ... News servers ... WWW/FTP Mirrors The Hermit Hacker
• 14:55   Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Tom Lane
• 14:55   patches for 6.5.0 Massimo Dal Zotto
• 15:13   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage The Hermit Hacker
• 15:23   Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Bruce Momjian
• 16:51   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian
• 18:07   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Tom Lane
• 18:29   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian
• 18:54   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Tom Lane
• 19:13   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian
• 19:49   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Tom Lane
• 19:51   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian