Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 March 1999

• 00:16   IMPORTANT NOTICE II: pgsql-loophole@postgresql.org scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker)
• 05:11   news2mail gateway... The Hermit Hacker
• 12:34   A small Password Manager server for PGSQL Peter Blazso
• 13:23   Bug report Giuseppe Tanzilli
• 14:38   Re: [HACKERS] quick Date question Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:14   Re: OUTER joins Thomas G. Lockhart
• 17:34   NUMERIC and Perl Kaare Rasmussen
• 19:55   Re: pwman is now more available ... :-) Peter Blazso

2 March 1999

• 01:17   Re: [HACKERS] timezones revisited Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:35   Re: BTW, datetime is busted in REL6_4 branch Thomas G. Lockhart
• 02:47   datetime.c in v6.4.3beta2 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 07:14   copyObject() ? again Hiroshi Inoue
• 11:55   Postgres under Windows NT Stefan Diestelmann
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? again Tom Lane
• 16:17   Re: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? again Vadim Mikheev
• 18:23   So long and thanks for all the fish Daryl W. Dunbar
• 19:03   Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC and Perl jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

3 March 1999

• 00:45   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:51   RE: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? again Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:16   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c' The Hermit Hacker
• 01:51   ... Billy G. Allie
• 02:14   Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC and Perl Thomas G. Lockhart
• 02:36   Re: [HACKERS] datetime.c in v6.4.3beta2 ... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 02:50   Re: [HACKERS] datetime.c in v6.4.3beta2 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 04:28   palloc.h again Michael Meskes
• 04:39   Re: [HACKERS] datetime.c in v6.4.3beta2 ... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:54   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c' Tom Lane
• 05:09   Re: [HACKERS] datetime.c in v6.4.3beta2 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 05:28   int 8 on FreeBSD Holm Tiffe
• 06:02   Re: [INTERFACES] Foreign Keys Gene Selkov Jr.
• 06:33   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Michael Graff
• 08:58   Re: [GENERAL] what on earth does this mean?!? Karl Auer
• 10:12   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD The Hermit Hacker
• 10:38   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Holm Tiffe
• 11:39   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD The Hermit Hacker
• 11:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c' geek+@cmu.edu
• 11:44   pg_dumpall and restoring Vince Vielhaber
• 12:25   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Holm Tiffe
• 12:40   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD The Hermit Hacker
• 12:41   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:54   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Holm Tiffe
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Holm Tiffe
• 13:09   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c' Tom Lane
• 13:16   Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again Tom Lane
• 13:28   Re: [PORTS] Port Bug Report: Error with date_part when checking month Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:52   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:42   Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC and Perl Kaare Rasmussen
• 17:11   Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC and Perl jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:52   parser enhancement request for 6.5 Michael Davis
• 20:15   for row in select loop question Michael Davis
• 20:28   Tom Lane's fixes in v6.4.3 Tatsuo Ishii
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again Tom Lane
• 21:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c' Tom Lane
• 21:55   Re: [HACKERS] Tom Lane's fixes in v6.4.3 Tom Lane
• 22:25   Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again James Thompson
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Tatsuo Ishii

4 March 1999

• 00:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:33   Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC and Perl Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:41   Re: [HACKERS] parser enhancement request for 6.5 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:47   Re: [HACKERS] Tom Lane's fixes in v6.4.3 Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:38   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Gerald L. Gay
• 01:40   Re: Tcl/Tk config (was: int 8 on FreeBSD) Roland Roberts
• 01:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tcl/Tk config (was: int 8 on FreeBSD) Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:43   Re: [HACKERS] Tom Lane's fixes in v6.4.3 Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:58   RE: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? again Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:26   PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: typeidTypeRelid error David R. Favor
• 09:31   PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: typeidTypeRelid error David R. Favor
• 09:51   Not enough memory for complex join Oleg Broytmann
• 11:11   Re: [HACKERS] Not enough memory for complex join Hannu Krosing
• 11:16   Re: [HACKERS] Not enough memory for complex join Oleg Broytmann
• 11:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tcl/Tk config (was: int 8 on FreeBSD) The Hermit Hacker
• 11:48   Legacy Brad
• 11:54   2gig limit fix... The Hermit Hacker
• 12:05   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: typeidTypeRelid error Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:40   v6.4.3beta3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 12:43   Re: [HACKERS] Tom Lane's fixes in v6.4.3 Tom Lane
• 12:53   Re: PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: typeidTypeRelid error Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:55   Fixed! PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: typeidTypeRelid error David R. Favor
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Fixed! PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: typeidTypeRelid error Tom Lane
• 13:13   Re: [HACKERS] Fixed! PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: typeidTypeRelid error The Hermit Hacker
• 13:19   Re: [HACKERS] Fixed! PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: typeidTypeRelid error David R. Favor
• 13:39   Re: [HACKERS] Fixed! PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: typeidTypeRelid error The Hermit Hacker
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tcl/Tk config (was: int 8 on FreeBSD) Vince Vielhaber
• 14:23   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3beta3 ... Vince Vielhaber
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tcl/Tk config (was: int 8 on FreeBSD) The Hermit Hacker
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3beta3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 16:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tcl/Tk config (was: int 8 on FreeBSD) Vince Vielhaber
• 16:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tcl/Tk config (was: int 8 on FreeBSD) The Hermit Hacker
• 18:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tcl/Tk config (was: int 8 on FreeBSD) Vince Vielhaber
• 18:42   PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: regression test compile error David R. Favor
• 19:35   6.5 enhancement request Michael Davis
• 19:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tcl/Tk config (was: int 8 on FreeBSD) Vince Vielhaber
• 21:04   Re: Your recent message to Topica.com Michael Graff
• 23:08   Re: [HACKERS] Tom Lane's fixes in v6.4.3 Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:12   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3beta3 ... Tatsuo Ishii

5 March 1999

• 00:03   Re: [HACKERS] Not enough memory for complex join Vadim Mikheev
• 00:40   Re: Fixed! PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: typeidTypeRelid error Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:50   Why is that so slow? Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:37   Re: [HACKERS] Why is that so slow? Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:57   Re: [INTERFACES] Foreign Keys Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:25   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on AIX 4.3.2: regression test comp ile error Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 07:51   Re: [HACKERS] Not enough memory for complex join Oleg Broytmann
• 07:53   Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:14   Bug on complex join Oleg Broytmann
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Your recent message to Topica.com Tom Lane
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex join Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:15   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex join Oleg Broytmann
• 13:35   Regression differences on Red Hat 5.2 Terry Mackintosh
• 13:36   RE: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question Michael Davis
• 13:42   Greek locale Oleg Broytmann
• 15:43   Re: [HACKERS] Not enough memory for complex join The Hermit Hacker
• 15:47   PL/PGSQL Jackson, DeJuan
• 16:17   Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Transaction logging jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:17   RE: [HACKERS] PL/PGSQL Jackson, DeJuan
• 16:47   RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Transaction logging Michael Davis
• 17:00   RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Transaction logging Jackson, DeJuan
• 17:05   RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Transaction logging Michael Davis
• 17:36   Stupid CVS question James Thompson
• 18:15   Re: [HACKERS] Stupid CVS question The Hermit Hacker
• 21:17   permissions problem Michael Davis
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] Why is that so slow? Tom Lane
• 23:08   RE: [GENERAL] permissions problem Michael Davis
• 23:56   View causes error in pg_tables Michael Davis

6 March 1999

• 00:30   Permissions problems Michael Davis
• 01:44   Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question Gerald L. Gay
• 06:41   ER, OMT chart of a database Martin Möderndorfer
• 07:57   Re: [HACKERS] Not enough memory for complex join Vadim Mikheev
• 08:25   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex join Vadim Mikheev
• 12:12   Re: [HACKERS] Why is that so slow? Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] Why is that so slow? Tom Lane
• 15:22   Re: Number of parameters in a sql function Tom Lane
• 18:28   a "bug" in v6.4.3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 19:27   RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Transaction logging Todd Graham Lewis
• 19:29   CVS access? Todd Graham Lewis
• 19:51   Re: [HACKERS] CVS access? James Thompson
• 21:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Tom Lane
• 21:44   Re: [HACKERS] CVS access? Tom Lane
• 21:53   Re: [HACKERS] Tom Lane's fixes in v6.4.3 Tom Lane
• 23:18   Updatable views? Michael Davis

7 March 1999

• 00:37   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot] Bruce Momjian
• 01:24   Re: OUTER joins Bruce Momjian
• 02:48   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Kevin Lo
• 02:54   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Kevin Lo
• 09:29   Re: [HACKERS] Why is that so slow? Bruce Momjian
• 09:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian
• 10:03   Re: GEQO threshold results Bruce Momjian
• 14:34   Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again James Thompson
• 14:37   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] Why is that so slow? Tom Lane
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] Why is that so slow? Bruce Momjian
• 16:53   6.4.3 release Bruce Momjian
• 17:23   Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again Tom Lane
• 17:47   Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again James Thompson
• 19:13   PostgreSQL 6.4.2: typeidTypeRelid error Erik Riedel
• 19:20   PostgreSQL 6.4.2: typeidTypeRelid error Erik Riedel
• 21:06   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD The Hermit Hacker
• 21:09   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3 release The Hermit Hacker
• 21:14   MVCC? Where? Todd Graham Lewis
• 21:48   MVCC? Where? tlewis@mindspring.net (Todd Graham Lewis)
• 21:50   [HACKERS] Problem with nextval and rules Justin Subert

8 March 1999

• 00:06   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Michael Graff
• 00:08   Re: Sunos 5.6 ,SUN C compiler 4.2,postgresql-6.4.2 Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:19   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD The Hermit Hacker
• 05:13   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD Tom Lane
• 05:19   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3 release Tom Lane
• 05:27   Typeidentifying not working sometimes? Michael Reifenberger
• 05:45   Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again Michael Meskes
• 05:58   ... Michael Reifenberger
• 06:30   Re: [HACKERS] Updatable views? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:33   Timespan_div misbehaving? Michael Reifenberger
• 07:30   Re: [HACKERS] Updatable views? Kaare Rasmussen
• 09:41   What's happened with 1942 jose' soares
• 10:51   Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD The Hermit Hacker
• 10:52   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3 release The Hermit Hacker
• 11:23   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.4.2: typeidTypeRelid error David R. Favor
• 11:23   Postgress case insensitive search on FreeBSD3.0 Vadim Valiakhmetov
• 11:34   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3 release Bruce Momjian
• 11:41   Re: [HACKERS] Postgress case insensitive search on FreeBSD3.0 Angelos Karageorgiou
• 11:47   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3 release The Hermit Hacker
• 12:39   Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again Tom Lane
• 13:22   Re: [HACKERS] Timespan_div misbehaving? Tom Lane
• 13:33   Re: [HACKERS] What's happened with 1942 Tom Lane
• 14:50   Niladic functions D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 15:34   Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 15:48   Niladic functions darcy@druid.net ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain)
• 15:53   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 16:49   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 16:57   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 17:10   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Egon Schmid
• 17:40   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 17:44   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 17:46   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 17:57   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Egon Schmid
• 18:06   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 18:16   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 18:21   psql command drops connection to backend Theo Kramer
• 19:10   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 20:44   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Tom Lane
• 21:16   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 21:27   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 21:37   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 23:46   Announcing the G Transaction Server! Todd Graham Lewis
• 23:48   Announcing the G Transaction Server! tlewis@mindspring.net (Todd Graham Lewis)
• 23:55   Re: [HACKERS] Timespan_div misbehaving? Tom Lane

9 March 1999

• 00:28   Re: [HACKERS] a "bug" in v6.4.3 ... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:30   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC? Where? Vadim Mikheev
• 00:32   Re: [HACKERS] Timespan_div misbehaving? Bruce Momjian
• 00:34   Re: [HACKERS] CVS access? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:48   Re: OUTER joins Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:05   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3 release Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:21   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 01:23   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 01:25   Re: OUTER joins Bruce Momjian
• 01:46   Re: [HACKERS] What's happened with 1942 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:48   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 01:59   Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:07   Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again Michael Meskes
• 06:30   dynamic loading on NT works! Horak Daniel
• 07:00   Re: [HACKERS] Not enough memory for complex join Oleg Broytmann
• 07:15   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:33   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex join Oleg Broytmann
• 07:40   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex join Oleg Broytmann
• 09:58   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 10:55   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex join Hannu Krosing
• 11:33   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 11:34   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 11:39   Re: [HACKERS] dynamic loading on NT works! The Hermit Hacker
• 13:24   vacuum analyze Mikhail Terekhov
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex join Oleg Broytmann
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 14:44   Bitwise AND Choong, Eddie
• 15:38   Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:56   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 17:56   Nulls Michael Davis
• 21:04   Re: map Bruce Momjian
• 21:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map The Hermit Hacker
• 21:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Bruce Momjian

10 March 1999

• 00:20   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex join Vadim Mikheev
• 01:05   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 03:00   Re-Name Attributes on Inheritance Clark Evans
• 03:25   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 07:08   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:10   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:15   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:33   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex subselect (was: Bug on complex join) Oleg Broytmann
• 07:57   pg_dump and large objects ,sunos 5.6 , SC4.2 David O'Farrell
• 09:51   RE: [HACKERS] Developers globe Peter Mount
• 09:52   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 12:23   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 12:26   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 12:51   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 13:04   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 13:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Bruce Momjian
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re-Name Attributes on Inheritance Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Tom Lane
• 14:05   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Vince Vielhaber
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Bruce Momjian
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Bruce Momjian
• 15:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Oleg Broytmann
• 15:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Bruce Momjian
• 15:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Oleg Bartunov
• 15:57   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:09   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Bruce Momjian
• 17:32   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:47   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 17:59   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 18:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:15   RE: [HACKERS] Bug on complex subselect (was: Bug on complex join) Jackson, DeJuan
• 18:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Bruce Momjian
• 18:49   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:51   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex subselect (was: Bug on complex join) Thomas Reinke
• 18:52   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 18:59   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Vince Vielhaber
• 19:23   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 19:27   RE: [HACKERS] Bug on complex subselect (was: Bug on complex join) Jackson, DeJuan
• 19:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: map Bruce Momjian
• 19:34   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 19:41   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Egon Schmid
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 20:47   query corruption for complexer queries on -current? Michael Reifenberger
• 21:11   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 23:12   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Michael Graff

11 March 1999

• 00:29   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe The Hermit Hacker
• 00:47   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vadim Mikheev
• 06:50   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex subselect (was: Bug on complex join) Igor Sysoev
• 06:55   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex subselect (was: Bug on complex join) Igor Sysoev
• 08:29   [CURRENT] NetBSD/macppc porting patch Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:50   RE: [HACKERS] Bug on complex subselect (was: Bug on complex join) Oleg Broytmann
• 13:57   Binary-compatible types vs. overloaded operators Tom Lane
• 14:32   What unresolved issues are in CVS? James Thompson
• 15:19   Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS? Bruce Momjian
• 15:28   Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS? James Thompson
• 15:32   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:36   Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS? Bruce Momjian
• 15:40   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Clark Evans
• 15:43   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 15:47   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:49   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 15:54   Compiling PostgreSQL on SINIX Hannu Krosing
• 15:57   RE: [HACKERS] Bug on complex subselect (was: Bug on complex join) Jackson, DeJuan
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 16:01   RE: [HACKERS] Bug on complex subselect (was: Bug on complex join) Oleg Broytmann
• 16:02   Parameterized Types and Session Memory Clark Evans
• 16:05   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling PostgreSQL on SINIX Bruce Momjian
• 16:09   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:41   INT64_FORMAT missing James Thompson
• 22:09   tutorial won't compile in current tree. Clark Evans

12 March 1999

• 03:12   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vadim Mikheev
• 03:57   more on large objects using postgresql.snapshot from today (March 11) Jason Venner
• 13:47   Re: [HACKERS] tutorial won't compile in current tree. Tom Lane
• 18:49   Simple C++ program using libpq that failes very quickly using the lo interface Jason Venner
• 19:58   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:04   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Vince Vielhaber
• 20:35   Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 21:36   RE: [HACKERS] tutorial won't compile in current tree. Stupor Genius
• 23:36   GetAttributeByName Clark Evans

13 March 1999

• 00:23   SPI_stringtodatum SPI_datumtostring ? Clark Evans
• 00:26   Re: [HACKERS] tutorial won't compile in current tree. Bruce Momjian
• 01:13   Re: [HACKERS] tutorial won't compile in current tree. Clark Evans
• 01:54   My webcam Bruce Momjian
• 04:46   Re: [HACKERS] tutorial won't compile in current tree. Clark Evans

14 March 1999

• 00:59   Re: [HACKERS] tutorial won't compile in current tree. Bruce Momjian
• 02:48   URGENT - "CANNOT EXTEND" Tim Perdue
• 03:07   Re: [HACKERS] URGENT - "CANNOT EXTEND" Bruce Momjian
• 03:13   Re: [HACKERS] discussion on proposed int8_ops patch Bruce Momjian
• 03:15   Re: [HACKERS] parser enhancement request for 6.5 Bruce Momjian
• 03:27   RE: [HACKERS] parser enhancement request for 6.5 Michael Davis
• 08:25   Re: [HACKERS] URGENT - "CANNOT EXTEND" Peter T Mount
• 09:02   Re: [HACKERS] URGENT - "CANNOT EXTEND" Peter T Mount
• 14:03   Re: [PATCHES] [CURRENT] NetBSD/macppc porting patch Bruce Momjian
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] [CURRENT] large object fix Bruce Momjian
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] KTH-KRB kerberos 4 patch Bruce Momjian
• 14:44   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Bruce Momjian
• 14:48   Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question Bruce Momjian
• 14:49   Re: your mail Bruce Momjian
• 15:32   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Tom Lane
• 15:47   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Clark Evans
• 15:52   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane
• 16:10   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Bruce Momjian
• 16:22   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Tom Lane
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Bruce Momjian
• 19:16   ICQ? Clark Evans
• 19:22   Re: [GENERAL] More details on Database corruption Bruce Momjian
• 19:22   Re: [HACKERS] ICQ? Bruce Momjian
• 20:53   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Gerald L. Gay
• 22:34   Re: [GENERAL] Foreign Keys: check_primary_function Bruce Momjian
• 23:29   Autoconf versions Tom Lane
• 23:49   Re: [HACKERS] INT64_FORMAT missing Tom Lane

15 March 1999

• 00:36   Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) Tom Lane
• 02:26   Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf versions The Hermit Hacker
• 02:31   Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf versions Michael Robinson
• 03:22   Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf versions Tom Lane
• 05:01   Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf versions The Hermit Hacker
• 05:43   Re: [HACKERS] ICQ? Dmitry Samersoff
• 05:44   Re: [HACKERS] ICQ? Dmitry Samersoff
• 06:34   ... Maurizio Marini
• 07:06   RE: [HACKERS] ICQ? Peter Mount
• 07:06   RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter Mount
• 07:57   RE: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:20   Sequences.... Ryan Bradetich
• 10:30   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 11:06   Re: [HACKERS] ICQ? D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 11:09   Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) Cary O'Brien
• 11:36   Re: [HACKERS] Bug on complex join Oleg Broytmann
• 11:37   new mirror Dmitry Samersoff
• 11:50   Re: [HACKERS] RE: [PHP3] [OFF-TOPIC] POSTGRES Bruce Momjian
• 12:12   Re: [HACKERS] How to destroy your entire Postgres installation Bruce Momjian
• 12:12   Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib Bruce Momjian
• 12:15   6.5 beta soon Bruce Momjian
• 12:27   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump again Bruce Momjian
• 12:29   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Bruce Momjian
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] SPI_prepare() doesn't work well ? Bruce Momjian
• 12:36   RE: [HACKERS] ICQ? Peter Mount
• 12:37   Re: [HACKERS] Odd behavior of type coercion for datetime Bruce Momjian
• 12:38   Re: [HACKERS] Another speedup idea (two, even) Bruce Momjian
• 12:45   Re: [HACKERS] Patch (was: tough locale bug) Bruce Momjian
• 12:45   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Bruce Momjian
• 12:53   Re: [HACKERS] char(n) default '' crashes server Bruce Momjian
• 12:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Bruce Momjian
• 12:59   Re: [HACKERS] Odd behavior of type coercion for datetime Tom Lane
• 13:01   Re: [HACKERS] NEXTSTEP porting problems Bruce Momjian
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Another speedup idea (two, even) Tom Lane
• 13:03   Re: your mail Bruce Momjian
• 13:06   Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Bruce Momjian
• 13:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Bruce Momjian
• 13:19   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane
• 13:25   Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Bruce Momjian
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 13:27   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump again Tom Lane
• 13:29   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 13:34   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Bruce Momjian
• 13:39   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane
• 13:40   Re: [HACKERS] new mirror Bruce Momjian
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 13:56   Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2 Bruce Momjian
• 14:04   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2 reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu (Ross J. Reedstrom)
• 15:12   developers globe Bruce Momjian
• 15:23   Re: developers globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:23   HTML index of source code Bruce Momjian
• 16:52   Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) secret
• 17:03   Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS? Peter T Mount
• 17:12   Odd question... The Hermit Hacker
• 17:21   Re: [HACKERS] Odd question... Todd Graham Lewis
• 17:25   RE: [HACKERS] Odd question... Michael Davis
• 17:30   RE: [HACKERS] Odd question... Vince Vielhaber
• 18:14   Re: [HACKERS] HTML index of source code The Hermit Hacker
• 19:14   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:14   Re: [HACKERS] HTML index of source code Bruce Momjian
• 19:46   Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:47   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Bruce Momjian
• 19:51   Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 19:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:07   RE: [HACKERS] Developers Globe (FINAL) Vince Vielhaber
• 20:16   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Ryan Bradetich
• 20:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 20:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 20:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Vince Vielhaber
• 20:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 20:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Vince Vielhaber
• 21:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 21:09   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Clark Evans
• 21:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 21:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 21:28   Globe Bruce Momjian
• 21:51   Re: [HACKERS] Developers Globe (FINAL) Patrick Welche
• 23:14   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Ryan Bradetich
• 23:27   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Tim Perdue
• 23:29   Re: [HACKERS] NEXTSTEP porting problems Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:35   Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:41   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:52   non existing table error message changed? Tatsuo Ishii

16 March 1999

• 00:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:40   snprintf() instead of sprintf() ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:45   [CURRENT] contrib/array_iterator patch Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:54   RE: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:57   Re: [HACKERS] non existing table error message changed? Bruce Momjian
• 01:06   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Tim Perdue
• 01:08   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Bruce Momjian
• 01:10   Re: [HACKERS] [CURRENT] contrib/array_iterator patch Bruce Momjian
• 01:16   Re: [HACKERS] Developers Globe (FINAL) Tom Lane
• 01:24   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Bruce Momjian
• 01:26   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Tom Lane
• 01:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2 Tom Lane
• 01:49   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Tom Lane
• 01:59   Re: [HACKERS] HTML index of source code The Hermit Hacker
• 02:02   Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) The Hermit Hacker
• 02:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2 Bruce Momjian
• 02:15   Re: [HACKERS] HTML index of source code Bruce Momjian
• 02:16   Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 02:28   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Vadim Mikheev
• 02:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2 Bruce Momjian
• 02:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2 Vadim Mikheev
• 02:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2 Bruce Momjian
• 02:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2 Vadim Mikheev
• 02:58   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2 Bruce Momjian
• 03:01   Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() instead of sprintf() ? Bruce Momjian
• 05:41   TODO item Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:43   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Ryan Bradetich
• 05:56   RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter Mount
• 07:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:22   Re: [HACKERS] Globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:29   Re: [HACKERS] Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:51   Re: [HACKERS] Developers Globe (FINAL) The Hermit Hacker
• 12:05   Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) secret
• 13:46   ... Dan Hrabarchuk
• 13:49   Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) Tom Lane
• 13:49    Nugent, Michael P (SAIC)
• 14:36   Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) secret
• 16:10   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 16:29   Re: [HACKERS] Globeu Bruce Momjian
• 16:38   Re: [HACKERS] Globe] Bruce Momjian
• 16:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 16:53   RE: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Michael Davis
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) Bruce Momjian
• 17:29   Current Tree Build Failure Clark Evans
• 17:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:10   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 18:10   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 18:11   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Bruce Momjian
• 18:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Vince Vielhaber
• 18:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:56   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 19:33   Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire) Clark Evans
• 19:41   Re: [HACKERS] Globe Peter T Mount
• 20:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) secret
• 20:30   Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire) Bruce Momjian
• 20:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) Bruce Momjian
• 20:38   Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire) Clark Evans
• 20:39   Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire) D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 20:46   Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire) Clark Evans
• 20:49   Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire) Clark Evans
• 21:00   Subqueries and indexes Bruce Momjian
• 21:17   RE: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of f rying pan, into fire) Michael Davis
• 21:26   Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire) Clark Evans
• 21:58   RE: [HACKERS] parser enhancement request for 6.5 Michael Davis
• 21:58   Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 22:05   RE: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of f rying pan, into fire) Michael Davis
• 22:05   RE: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of f rying pan, into fire) Michael Davis
• 22:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) Tom Lane
• 22:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu (Ross J. Reedstrom)
• 22:43   Oracle's DECODE and NVL Clark Evans
• 23:45   Re: [HACKERS] Subqueries and indexes Vadim Mikheev

17 March 1999

• 00:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 02:45   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:58   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Ryan Bradetich
• 03:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 03:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) The Hermit Hacker
• 03:46   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Clark Evans
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] Subqueries and indexes Bruce Momjian
• 05:04   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Vadim Mikheev
• 05:12   Re: [HACKERS] Subqueries and indexes Vadim Mikheev
• 06:27   Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of f rying pan, into fire) Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 06:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:50   Modulo syntax Oleg Broytmann
• 07:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:28   ... R. Jalili
• 08:28   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 08:28   Re: PostgreSQL 6.4.2: float8::text (fwd) Oleg Broytmann
• 08:28   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:28   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 11:10   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tim Perdue
• 11:47   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 14:21   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Bruce Momjian
• 14:21   Re: [HACKERS] Modulo syntax Bruce Momjian
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Tom Lane
• 16:13   [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....] Clark Evans
• 16:31   vacuum slowness Bruce Momjian
• 16:33   Re: [HACKERS] Subqueries and indexes Bruce Momjian
• 16:33   Re: [HACKERS] Subqueries and indexes Bruce Momjian
• 16:34   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Bruce Momjian
• 17:32   Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....] Terry Mackintosh
• 18:58   Use of multiple || and precidence Bruce Momjian
• 19:10   What does this mean: SIAssignBackendId: discarding tag 2147483505 in 6.3.4 Jason Venner
• 19:49   RE: [HACKERS] Use of multiple || and precidence Michael Davis
• 20:02   Re: [HACKERS] Modulo syntax Bruce Momjian
• 20:13   & Vince Vielhaber
• 20:51   New postgres -O option for system tables Bruce Momjian
• 21:04   Re: [HACKERS] New postgres -O option for system tables Clark Evans
• 21:08   cache lookups Bruce Momjian
• 21:09   Re: [HACKERS] New postgres -O option for system tables Bruce Momjian
• 21:17   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Peter T Mount
• 21:24   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Bruce Momjian
• 21:48   OID vs SERIAL? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....) Clark Evans
• 21:51   Re: OID vs SERIAL? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....) Bruce Momjian
• 21:54   Re: OID vs SERIAL? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....) Clark Evans
• 21:56   Re: OID vs SERIAL? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....) Bruce Momjian
• 22:12   atttypmod usage Bruce Momjian
• 22:44   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Tim Perdue
• 23:20   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Ryan Bradetich
• 23:51   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Tom Lane
• 23:53   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum slowness Tom Lane
• 23:57   Re: vacuum slowness Vadim Mikheev

18 March 1999

• 00:26   Re: OID vs SERIAL? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....) Tom Lane
• 00:37   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Tom Lane
• 00:40   Re: [HACKERS] Subqueries and indexes Vadim Mikheev
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Bruce Momjian
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum slowness Bruce Momjian
• 00:48   One more globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 00:49   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Bruce Momjian
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Tim Perdue
• 02:00   Re: [HACKERS] One more globe The Hermit Hacker
• 02:07   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 02:47   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum slowness Wayne Piekarski
• 03:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum slowness Vadim Mikheev
• 03:16   Re: OID vs SERIAL? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....) Bruce Momjian
• 03:19   Re: [HACKERS] One more globe Bruce Momjian
• 03:20   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Bruce Momjian
• 03:39   hotmail i love lesbians
• 03:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum slowness Clark Evans
• 03:52   Re: OID vs SERIAL? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....) Tom Lane
• 04:43   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Hannu Krosing
• 04:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum slowness Vadim Mikheev
• 05:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum slowness Clark Evans
• 06:24   RE: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum slowness Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:22   Re: [HACKERS] One more globe jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:55   Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Vadim Mikheev
• 13:20   AW: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 13:21   Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Andriy I Pilipenko
• 14:30   Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Vadim Mikheev
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Bruce Momjian
• 15:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Vadim Mikheev
• 15:55   AW: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 16:13   Re: [ADMIN] delete data Terry Mackintosh
• 16:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Bruce Momjian
• 16:42   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Vadim Mikheev
• 16:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Bruce Momjian
• 16:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Bruce Momjian
• 16:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Bruce Momjian
• 16:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Vadim Mikheev
• 16:58   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Vadim Mikheev
• 17:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Bruce Momjian
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) (fwd) Terry Mackintosh
• 17:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Bruce Momjian
• 18:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Bruce Momjian
• 19:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Bruce Momjian

19 March 1999

• 00:40   Removing derived files from CVS Tom Lane
• 00:44   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Bruce Momjian
• 00:56   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Clark Evans
• 01:39   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 01:39   6.5 Features list Bruce Momjian
• 02:03   6.5 Feature list and summary Bruce Momjian
• 02:24   Problem with query length Taravudh Tipdecho
• 02:41   FUNCTION bind (TABLE, COLUMN, SEQUENCE) returns OLD_SEQUENCE? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....) Clark Evans
• 03:24   Trigger Tangent (Was: bind (Was: sequences )) Clark Evans
• 06:12   AW: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 07:23   indexes with OR clauses is slow ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:36   Re: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....] Ryan Bradetich
• 07:41   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 Feature list and summary Oleg Broytmann
• 11:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer The Hermit Hacker
• 11:42   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS The Hermit Hacker
• 11:56   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS geek+@cmu.edu
• 12:10   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 Features list Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:20   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 Features list Oleg Broytmann
• 12:47   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Tom Lane
• 12:59   Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... Tom Lane
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 Features list Oleg Bartunov
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Tom Lane
• 13:47   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with query length Tom Lane
• 15:25   portability patch Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 16:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Vince Vielhaber
• 16:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) The Hermit Hacker
• 16:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) The Hermit Hacker
• 16:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer Bruce Momjian
• 16:45   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS The Hermit Hacker
• 16:57   Re: [HACKERS] portability patch Bruce Momjian
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 17:05   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 17:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 17:09   problems with a view Peter Blazso
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 17:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) The Hermit Hacker
• 17:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:58   aggregation memory leak and fix Erik Riedel
• 19:06   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Vince Vielhaber
• 20:19   RE: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of f rying pan, into fire) Michael Davis
• 20:26   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Bruce Momjian
• 20:35   Additional requests for version 6.5 Michael Davis
• 20:44   Re: [HACKERS] Additional requests for version 6.5 Bruce Momjian
• 22:43   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Erik Riedel
• 23:58   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Bruce Momjian

20 March 1999

• 00:03   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Bruce Momjian
• 00:07   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Bruce Momjian
• 00:08   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 Features list Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:33   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Bruce Momjian
• 02:07   Re: [HACKERS] One more globe Bruce Momjian
• 02:12   Re: [HACKERS] One more globe Vince Vielhaber
• 02:15   Re: [HACKERS] One more globe Bruce Momjian
• 05:11   min() and max() causing aborts Michael Davis
• 09:28   CVS target for docs Michael Meskes
• 11:00   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Bruce Momjian
• 11:01   Re: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts Bruce Momjian
• 11:02   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 Feature list and summary Bruce Momjian
• 11:02   Re: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts Bruce Momjian
• 11:17   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Bruce Momjian
• 11:18   Re: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts Bruce Momjian
• 12:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs Tom Lane
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Tom Lane
• 16:59   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Tom Lane
• 17:45   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 Features list Michael Meskes
• 19:32   RE: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts Michael Davis
• 23:16   Re: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts Bruce Momjian
• 23:34   Unary % operator is broken in current sources Tom Lane

21 March 1999

• 00:11   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 Features list Bruce Momjian
• 00:27   Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources Bruce Momjian
• 00:52   Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources Tom Lane
• 01:14   Re: check_primary_key is busted too Bruce Momjian
• 01:15   Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources Bruce Momjian
• 03:15   RE: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts Michael Davis
• 04:29   Re: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts Bruce Momjian
• 07:15   Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs Michael Meskes
• 10:29   problems are now solved with the view Peter Blazso
• 13:01   Re: [HACKERS] discussion on proposed int8_ops patch Thomas Lockhart
• 13:09   Re: [HACKERS] parser enhancement request for 6.5 Thomas Lockhart
• 13:10   Back on line, sort of Thomas Lockhart
• 13:11   Re: [HACKERS] Binary-compatible types vs. overloaded operators Thomas Lockhart
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs Tom Lane
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] non existing table error message changed? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts Tom Lane
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts Bruce Momjian
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources Bruce Momjian
• 17:05   Re: [HACKERS] discussion on proposed int8_ops patch Bruce Momjian
• 17:16   Re: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts Tom Lane
• 18:00   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Bruce Momjian
• 18:33   Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources Tom Lane
• 18:54   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Tom Lane
• 21:56   macaddr stuff ! Pawel Pierscionek
• 23:55   RE: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts Michael Davis

22 March 1999

• 00:38   Passwords in cleartext? James Thompson
• 01:38   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS The Hermit Hacker
• 01:39   Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs The Hermit Hacker
• 01:41   Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs The Hermit Hacker
• 02:41   Operator '%' Michael Meskes
• 03:01   Re: [HACKERS] macaddr stuff !u Bruce Momjian
• 03:07   Re: [HACKERS] Operator '%' Bruce Momjian
• 03:08   Re: [HACKERS] macaddr stuff ! Bruce Momjian
• 03:09   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Bruce Momjian
• 03:10   Find Out What The Future Holds For You? Silvia_Brown1@gte.net
• 09:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:06   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 Feature list and summary jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:09   RE: [HACKERS] dynamic loading on NT works! Horak Daniel
• 09:59   Re: [HACKERS] macaddr stuff ! D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:22   Find Out What The Future Holds For You? Silvia_Brown9@gte.net
• 13:14   Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs Tom Lane
• 13:19   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Tom Lane
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] dynamic loading on NT works! Bruce Momjian
• 14:52   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Bruce Momjian
• 14:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 15:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) The Hermit Hacker
• 15:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) The Hermit Hacker
• 15:13   Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs The Hermit Hacker
• 15:13   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Vince Vielhaber
• 15:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) The Hermit Hacker
• 20:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Hannu Krosing
• 21:33   optimizer and type question Erik Riedel
• 21:41   to text or not to text Vince Vielhaber
• 21:55   Re: [HACKERS] to text or not to text Bruce Momjian
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] optimizer and type question Taral
• 23:13   Re: [HACKERS] optimizer and type question Tom Lane

23 March 1999

• 00:30   Re: [HACKERS] optimizer and type question Bruce Momjian
• 01:00   portals vs. memory contexts Bruce Momjian
• 01:20   Re: portals vs. memory contexts Vadim Mikheev
• 01:29   CVS 3-22-99 \d broken? James Thompson
• 01:30   Re: [HACKERS] portals vs. memory contexts Bruce Momjian
• 01:37   Re: [HACKERS] portals vs. memory contexts Vadim Mikheev
• 02:16   Re: [HACKERS] optimizer and type question Erik Riedel
• 02:30   Re: portals vs. memory contexts Bruce Momjian
• 02:30   Re: [HACKERS] portals vs. memory contexts Bruce Momjian
• 03:38   Re: [HACKERS] optimizer and type question Bruce Momjian
• 04:21   Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs Michael Meskes
• 04:21   SET AUTO TRANSACTION Michael Meskes
• 07:05   Dimaond Logo (was Globe...) Hal Snyder
• 08:59   Re: [HACKERS] Dimaond Logo (was Globe...) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:23   Re: [HACKERS] Dimaond Logo (was Globe...) Vince Vielhaber
• 09:26   Re: [HACKERS] Dimaond Logo (was Globe...) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:31   Re: [HACKERS] Dimaond Logo (was Globe...) Vince Vielhaber
• 12:09   Re: [HACKERS] Dimaond Logo (was Globe...) The Hermit Hacker
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Bruce Momjian
• 13:21   RE: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Peter Mount
• 13:41   Find Out What The Future Holds For You? Silvia_Brown9@gte.net
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] CVS 3-22-99 \d broken? Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) secret
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) Taral
• 14:52   RE: [HACKERS] Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing pe rformance) Dan Gowin
• 15:02   Re: [HACKERS] optimizer and type question Tom Lane
• 15:11   Re: [HACKERS] optimizer and type question Tom Lane
• 21:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Clark Evans
• 21:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Bruce Momjian
• 21:10   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:12   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:23   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Vince Vielhaber
• 21:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL) Clark Evans
• 21:42   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:51   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Taral

24 March 1999

• 01:13   longer-term optimizer musings Erik Riedel
• 01:54   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Bruce Momjian
• 02:08   Re: [HACKERS] longer-term optimizer musings Bruce Momjian
• 02:13   Re: [HACKERS] longer-term optimizer musings Bruce Momjian
• 02:21   64-bit hashjoins Erik Riedel
• 02:33   Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Bruce Momjian
• 03:10   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) The Hermit Hacker
• 03:15   Re: [HACKERS] longer-term optimizer musings Erik Riedel
• 04:30   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Bruce Momjian
• 06:59   Really slow query on 6.4.2 Postgres mailing lists
• 11:00   Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:47   mcxt.h D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 12:00   RE: [HACKERS] mcxt.h Horak Daniel
• 12:39   mcxt.h darcy@druid.net ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain)
• 12:41   backend unstable, \d broken, groups broken was CVS 3-22-99 \d broken? James Thompson
• 13:04   RE: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 Michael Davis
• 13:10   Re: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 Tom Lane
• 13:14   Re: [HACKERS] mcxt.h Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: [HACKERS] longer-term optimizer musings Tom Lane
• 13:54   Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] backend unstable, \d broken, groups broken was CVS 3-22-99 \d broken? Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   static oid Massimo Dal Zotto
• 15:32   incorret definition of array_in Massimo Dal Zotto
• 16:06   Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix Erik Riedel
• 16:58   Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Erik Riedel
• 17:34   RE: [HACKERS] backend unstable, \d broken, groups broken was CVS 3-22-99 \d broken? Jackson, DeJuan
• 17:47   Re: [HACKERS] longer-term optimizer musings Erik Riedel
• 17:51   Re: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 RHS Linux User
• 21:54   Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Tom Lane
• 22:09   Re: [HACKERS] static oid Bruce Momjian
• 22:09   Re: [HACKERS] static oid Bruce Momjian
• 23:12   Re: [HACKERS] static oid Taral

25 March 1999

• 02:00   Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Tom Lane
• 02:41   Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Bruce Momjian
• 02:42   Re: [HACKERS] static oid Bruce Momjian
• 05:38   AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 06:22   Re: PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Hal Snyder
• 10:06   connection user Dmitry Samersoff
• 12:43   Locale patch (Greek locale and koi8-to-win1251 tests) Oleg Broytmann
• 13:18   Re: [HACKERS] connection user Tom Lane
• 13:23   Re: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 Tom Lane
• 13:58   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 The Hermit Hacker
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 Bruce Momjian
• 14:58   Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Erik Riedel
• 15:02   SIReadEntryData: cache state reset David O'Farrell
• 17:08   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:26   Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Tom Lane
• 17:35   Going on vacation Michael Meskes
• 17:35   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 Tom Lane
• 18:20   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Clark Evans
• 18:20   RE: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Jackson, DeJuan
• 18:20   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Vince Vielhaber
• 19:02   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 geek+@cmu.edu
• 20:54   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:54   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:23   Re: [HACKERS] Going on vacation The Hermit Hacker
• 21:23   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) The Hermit Hacker
• 21:23   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) The Hermit Hacker
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:12   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:18   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Bruce Momjian
• 23:32   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Vince Vielhaber

26 March 1999

• 00:00   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Taral
• 00:06   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Vince Vielhaber
• 00:19   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Taral
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) The Hermit Hacker
• 13:24   New regress test (was Re: Timespan_div misbehaving?) Tom Lane
• 13:29   Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire) Thomas Lockhart
• 13:36   pg_parg system table is suffering from software rot Tom Lane
• 13:59   Re: [HACKERS] Modulo syntax Thomas Lockhart
• 14:19   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] New regress test (was Re: Timespan_div misbehaving?) Bruce Momjian
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] pg_parg system table is suffering from software rot Bruce Momjian
• 14:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum slowness Thomas Lockhart
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] Modulo syntax Bruce Momjian
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Bruce Momjian
• 15:18   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:48   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 15:55   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Vince Vielhaber
• 16:01   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:14   Re: [HACKERS] SET AUTO TRANSACTION Thomas Lockhart
• 16:39   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) The Hermit Hacker
• 16:40   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) The Hermit Hacker
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Bruce Momjian
• 17:11   Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins Thomas Lockhart
• 17:13   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Kaare Rasmussen
• 17:20   RE: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Michael Davis
• 17:35   Re: [HACKERS] Going on vacation Thomas Lockhart
• 17:48   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) The Hermit Hacker
• 17:49   NULL handling question Vazsonyi Peter[ke]
• 17:52   RE: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) The Hermit Hacker
• 22:31   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Bruce Momjian

27 March 1999

• 04:05   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO Michael Robinson
• 11:04   timezone problem Daniel Kalchev
• 17:23   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO The Hermit Hacker
• 17:27   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) Hal Snyder
• 19:43   Merge joins badly broken in current sources Tom Lane

28 March 1999

• 00:27   Another new regress test Tom Lane
• 01:20   Speedup idea: avoid using SQL procedures as aliases Tom Lane
• 03:17   Parser doesn't grok unqualified array element Tom Lane
• 14:50   Memory grows without bounds in aggregates! Michael Contzen
• 15:15   Re: [HACKERS] Memory grows without bounds in aggregates! Tom Lane
• 19:35   vacuum updated... Vadim Mikheev
• 20:30   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO Bruce Momjian

29 March 1999

• 06:36   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:04   Re: [HACKERS] Locale patch (Greek locale and koi8-to-win1251 tests) Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:31   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO Hal Snyder
• 08:03   signal weirdness Peter Galbavy
• 08:34   New mirror Dmitry Samersoff
• 08:42   Re: [HACKERS] Locale patch (Greek locale and koi8-to-win1251 tests) Oleg Broytmann
• 08:44   Re: [HACKERS] Locale patch (Greek locale and koi8-to-win1251 tests) Oleg Broytmann
• 08:46   incorrect const usage Dmitry Samersoff
• 09:00   Large objects error - expected a 'V' from the backend Chris Bitmead
• 09:17   Re: [HACKERS] signal weirdness Peter Galbavy
• 09:45   Re: [HACKERS] Locale patch (Greek locale and koi8-to-win1251 tests) Oleg Bartunov
• 10:33   libpq++ Dmitry Samersoff
• 10:56   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO The Hermit Hacker
• 11:00   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... The Hermit Hacker
• 11:17   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Vince Vielhaber
• 11:26   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] signal weirdness Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] NULL handling question Thomas Lockhart
• 13:46   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: [HACKERS] incorrect const usage Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber
• 14:40   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/access/heap heapam.c't Bruce Momjian
• 14:40   Re: [HACKERS] Parser doesn't grok unqualified array element Bruce Momjian
• 14:40   Re: [HACKERS] Another new regress test Bruce Momjian
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] Memory grows without bounds in aggregates! Bruce Momjian
• 15:20   Re: [HACKERS] Large objects error - expected a 'V' from the backend Edmund Mergl
• 15:27   Re: [HACKERS] Speedup idea: avoid using SQL procedures as aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 15:27   Re: [HACKERS] NULL handling question D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 15:30   Re: [HACKERS] Parser doesn't grok unqualified array element Thomas Lockhart
• 15:31   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/utils Gen_fmgrtab.sh.in' Bruce Momjian
• 15:41   Re: [HACKERS] Memory grows without bounds in aggregates! Tom Lane
• 15:45   Re: [HACKERS] NULL handling question Vazsonyi Peter[ke]
• 15:47   Re: [HACKERS] Speedup idea: avoid using SQL procedures as aliases Tom Lane
• 15:54   Re: [HACKERS] Speedup idea: avoid using SQL procedures as aliases Bruce Momjian
• 15:56   RE: [HACKERS] NULL handling question Michael Davis
• 16:08   Re: [HACKERS] NULL handling question Thomas Lockhart
• 16:37   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 The Hermit Hacker
• 16:41   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 The Hermit Hacker
• 16:50   Re: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 The Hermit Hacker
• 18:07   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 geek+@cmu.edu
• 19:15   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber
• 21:33   Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use? Chris Bitmead
• 22:27   Commercial Support ... The Hermit Hacker
• 23:40   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:50   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... The Hermit Hacker

30 March 1999

• 00:46   SELECT (CASE ... ) gives copyObject error in current CVS build. Clark Evans
• 01:57   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:07   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... The Hermit Hacker
• 02:07   RE: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Jackson, DeJuan
• 02:53   Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use? Cary O'Brien
• 02:54   Some 6.5 regression tests are failing Michael Davis
• 03:07   Create user is failing under 6.5 Michael Davis
• 03:08   Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing Clark Evans
• 03:20   Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing The Hermit Hacker
• 03:23   select * from pg_veiw; errors in 6.5 and 6.4.2 Michael Davis
• 04:08   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Thomas Lockhart
• 04:12   Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Thomas Lockhart
• 06:01   Re: [HACKERS] select * from pg_veiw; errors in 6.5 and 6.4.2 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:29   Regression failures Chris Bitmead
• 08:05   RE: [HACKERS] Large objects error - expected a 'V' from the backe nd Peter Mount
• 08:05   Contacting me Peter Mount
• 08:14   dllist.c prlw1@cam.ac.uk (Patrick Welche)
• 08:14   RE: [HACKERS] Create user is failing under 6.5 Peter Mount
• 09:00   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Dmitry Samersoff
• 12:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use? Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:09   Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use? Chris Bitmead
• 12:16   Announcing 6.5 Beta! David O'Farrell
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] Announcing 6.5 Beta! The Hermit Hacker
• 13:20   RE: [HACKERS] Create user is failing under 6.5 James Thompson
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Bruce Momjian
• 14:15   Views, aggregations, and errors Michael Davis
• 14:33   Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: [HACKERS] Regression failures Thomas Lockhart
• 15:18   Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker
• 15:28   Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Andrew Merrill
• 15:33   RE: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Jackson, DeJuan
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... The Hermit Hacker
• 15:42   RE: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Jackson, DeJuan
• 16:13   Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Andrew Merrill
• 16:27   RE: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker
• 16:38   Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Clark Evans
• 16:44   RE: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker
• 16:48   Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Clark Evans
• 16:51   Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Clark Evans
• 17:08   Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker
• 19:27   Interesting failure when selecting aggregates Michael Davis
• 22:02   [OT] Timezones and Daylight savings. Jackson, DeJuan

31 March 1999

• 01:55   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Roland Roberts
• 06:06   Bug Report - Compile errors in vacuum.c and shmem.c Billy G. Allie
• 08:54   Date operations Oliver Smith
• 08:57   Date operations Oliver Smith
• 09:30   Re: [HACKERS] Date operations Oliver Smith
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] [OT] Timezones and Daylight savings. Thomas Lockhart
• 14:18   Re: [HACKERS] Date operations Thomas Lockhart
• 14:19   Re: [HACKERS] Date operations Thomas Lockhart
• 14:26   Bug Report - alter table does not work on temporary tables Clark Evans
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Tom Lane
• 14:50   patches for 6.5 Massimo Dal Zotto
• 18:13   problem with view Oleg Bartunov
• 19:33   RE: [HACKERS] [OT] Timezones and Daylight savings. Jackson, DeJuan
• 21:02   Problem with complexer join still persists sometimes Michael Reifenberger
• 22:08   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Tom Lane
• 22:25   Re: [PHP3] [OT]: SELECT COUNT(*) in Postgres Clark Evans
• 22:30   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber
• 22:59   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Tom Lane
• 23:07   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complexer join still persists sometimes Tom Lane