Unprivileged user wrote:
>
> PostgreSQL version : 6.4.2
>
...
>
> Here is an example session. Note that in first SELECT
> backend uses index scan, and in second one it uses
> sequental scan.
>
> == cut ==
> bamby=> create table table1 (field1 int);
> CREATE
> bamby=> create index i_table1__field1 on table1 (field1);
> CREATE
> bamby=> explain select * from table1 where field1 = 1;
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> Index Scan using i_table1__field1 on table1 (cost=0.00 size=0 width=4)
^^^^^^
Hmmm... Seems that vacuum wasn't run for table1.
Why is index used ?!!!
It's bug!
> EXPLAIN
> bamby=> explain select * from table1 where field1 = -1;
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> Seq Scan on table1 (cost=0.00 size=0 width=4)
Run
vacuum table1
Vadim
