Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gerald L. Gay
Subject Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question
Date
Msg-id 010401be6783$95bd9940$9a028a8f@2isdt54.korea.army.mil
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question
List pgsql-hackers
This is another example of why not allowing utility functions in SPI would
be a Bad Thing.

For what it's worth, I found another case in libpq where you can get a T
message without a D that my utility patch needs to handle.  I have attached
the updated patch against the 6.4.2 version of
src/interfaces/libpq/fe-exec.c

Jerry


> -----Original Message-----
> From: jwieck@debis.com [SMTP:jwieck@debis.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 1999 3:00 AM
> To: Michael Davis
> Cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question
>
> >
>
>     Second  REVOKE and GRANT are utility statements not supported
>     for prepared SPI plans and  thus  PL/pgSQL  currently  cannot
>     execute them.
>
>
> Jan
>
> --
>
>
>#======================================================================#
> # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being
>right. #
> # Let's break this rule - forgive me.
>#
> #======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan
>Wieck) #
>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Davis
Date:
Subject: Permissions problems
Next
From: Martin Möderndorfer
Date:
Subject: ER, OMT chart of a database