Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I just deleted all 50,000 rows from a table that has one int4 and one text
> field.
> Why does vacuum take so long? If all the rows are superceeded, so no
> rows actually have to be moved, should it take so long for vacuum to
> run?
Do you have any indexes on the table? I've noticed (and complained in
the past ;-)) that vacuuming a table takes unreasonably long if there
are a lot of dead index entries to be cleaned. It seems faster to drop
and recreate the index in a case like that.
regards, tom lane
