Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vince Vielhaber
Subject Re: [HACKERS] libpq++
Date
Msg-id XFMail.990329161533.vev@michvhf.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] libpq++  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] libpq++
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++
List pgsql-hackers
On 29-Mar-99 Tom Lane wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> writes:
>>> Who are maintainer of libpq++?
> 
>> I was going to when things settled down, but a couple of months ago
>> someone else posted to hackers that they had an immediate need and was
>> going to so I backed off.
> 
> I haven't noticed any patches getting posted, however, so whoever-it-was
> seems to have lost interest.  Vince, if you still are interested in
> adopting libpq++, it desperately needs a caring parent ;-)

Looking at it now.  I see the first thing I'm going to have to do is 
fix the docs - second actually, I need to find out why it didn't build
in my tree in the first place back when I went thru the docs in December.

Are there any glaring problems that require immediate attention that you
know of?  I see it hasn't been touched since around '97.

Vince.
-- 
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH   email: vev@michvhf.com   flame-mail: /dev/null      # include <std/disclaimers.h>
       TEAM-OS2       Online Campground Directory    http://www.camping-usa.com      Online Giftshop Superstore
http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: geek+@cmu.edu
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2
Next
From: Chris Bitmead
Date:
Subject: Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use?