Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs
Date
Msg-id 19990320211052.B2235@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 20, 1999 at 11:29:55AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> If you're using cvs it's easy to update any particular subtree of the
> distribution.  You do have to do a "cvs checkout pgsql" to populate the
> whole tree once, but you don't have to update all of it frequently if
> you don't want to --- just do

It's not that I have problems with the update. Currently I have ecpg checked
out on postgresql.org while working with my old cvsup setup at home. I then
transfer my patch to postgresql.org, apply and commit. 

I'm currently thinking about moving to cvs completely but wonder how much
more network traffic this will cause.

The idea with the docs was just to not checkout the whole source on Marc's
machine. But if I move it home it shouldn't matter.

Michael

-- 
Michael Meskes                         | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz    | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651                 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael.Meskes@gmx.net          | Use PostgreSQL!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts
Next
From: Peter Blazso
Date:
Subject: problems are now solved with the view