Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of f rying pan, into fire) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of f rying pan, into fire)
Date
Msg-id 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C60267B31F@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
>  
> >> I tried to create a C function to overcome this but noticed that if any
> >> parameter in my C function is NULL then the C function always returns
> NULL.
> >> I saw some references in the archives about this issue but was unable
> to
> >> determine where it was left.  What is the status of this issue?
> 
Yes, this is current behavior.
> Would a compromise be to add DECODE and NVL ?

The Standard has the more flexible function COALESCE, which is already
implemented in postgresql.
Simply say coalesce(field_that_can_be_null,value_to_return_insteadof_null)

Andreas 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Subqueries and indexes
Next
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL)