Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter T Mount
Subject Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.04.9903151855200.16622-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > > The only thing I know of is that the new MVCC code doesn't vacuum
> > > properly yet.  It does vacuum, I just suspect is does not know how to
> > > prevent vacuuming of rows that are being viewed by other backends.
> > > 
> > > Perhaps Vadim can comment on that.
> > 
> > So if other backends are not active then vacuum works OK?  Nightly vacuums
> > on inactive databases are OK?  If so then its "good enough for government
> > work" :)
> 
> My guess is that this is true.

It is true for me ;-)

--       Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk     Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgresJava PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: secret
Date:
Subject: Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance)
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Odd question...