> Ryan Bradetich wrote:
> > > Back to my origional point .. I think we need another system table to map
the
> > > sequence oid to the table's oid. I've noticed this done with the
inheritance,
> > > indexes, etc ... but I don't see a pg_sequence table.
>
> Sounds good.
>
> As long as a sequence can point to more than
> one table/column combination.
>
> Or, I guess, you can have the relationship 1-1 for
> the SERIAL type, but this should not prevent using
> sequences across more than one table if you don't use SERIAL.
> I often use a sequence for 3 or more tables in a system
> so that I can use 'generic' functions on the tables
> and produce reports without conficting primary keys..
>
> :) Clark
Hmm.. Good points.... I'll make sure that doesn't happen. Thanks for the tips.
:)
-Ryan
