I reposted the patch from home yesterday, as bruce pointed it out in
another thread.
Peter
--
Peter T Mount, IT Section
petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk
Anything I write here are my own views, and cannot be taken as the
official words of Maidstone Borough Council
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 1999 5:52 PM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0
Say guys,
I just noticed that RELSEG_SIZE still hasn't been reduced per the
discussion from early February. Let's make sure that doesn't slip
through the cracks, OK?
I think Peter Mount was supposed to be off testing this issue.
Peter, did you learn anything further?
We should probably apply the patch to REL6_4 as well...
regards, tom lane
