Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again
Date
Msg-id 26721.920503912@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again
List pgsql-hackers
jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
>     What I'm in doubt about is, why (if) we don't want to install
>     mcxt.h?   It  is  required  (since  my changes) by every user
>     built backend-loadable module. So it should be installed.

If it's only mcxt.h that is newly required, we may as well just export
it and be done with it.  My recollection of the original report was
that *several* formerly backend-private headers needed to be added to
the export set, and I thought that wasn't a very good idea...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Tom Lane's fixes in v6.4.3
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c'