> I said:
> > It looks like the entry for it in pg_proc is right, but the one in
> > pg_operator is wrong.
> >
> > Hmm, a whole new class of cross-checks that opr_sanity ought to make ;-)
>
> Indeed, applying a mechanical cross-check was fruitful ... I found four
> dozen pg_operator entries that disagree with the corresponding pg_proc
> entries:
Tom, would you please take the pg/include/catalog/*.sql files and merge
them into the regression sanity checks? They should be in there too.
You can remove them once you have moved them over.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
