Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 February 1999

• 00:45   Re: [HACKERS] Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Vadim Mikheev
• 01:05   Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev
• 02:54   Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev
• 06:38   Is libpq re-entrant? Ian Grant
• 07:14   RE: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 11:19   Re: [COMMITTERS] [WEBMASTER] 'www/html main.html' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 11:29   Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev
• 11:54   Re: [COMMITTERS] [WEBMASTER] 'www/html main.html' Bruce Momjian
• 11:59   Re: [HACKERS] Patch (was: tough locale bug) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:19   PL/pgSQL / SPI and UTILITY statements jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:20   Re: [HACKERS] Patch (was: tough locale bug) Oleg Broytmann
• 13:01   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON ... ORDER BY ... jose' soares
• 14:40   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON ... ORDER BY ... Oliver Elphick
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] Patch (was: tough locale bug) Goran Thyni
• 14:46   Re: [HACKERS] Patch (was: tough locale bug) Goran Thyni
• 15:45   ... Venkatesh. K
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] Is libpq re-entrant? Tom Lane
• 17:10   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] [WEBMASTER] 'www/html main.html' jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] [WEBMASTER] 'www/html main.html' Bruce Momjian
• 17:48   Problems doing a copy to a table Chris Williams
• 18:08   Re: [GENERAL] big bad join problems Bruce Momjian
• 18:21   Re: [HACKERS] Problems doing a copy to a table jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:32   New patch (was: tough bug) Goran Thyni
• 18:33   Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:24   Re: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c Bruce Momjian
• 21:29   RE: [HACKERS] Patches Jackson, DeJuan
• 21:36   Re: [HACKERS] Patches Bruce Momjian
• 22:18   Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Tom Lane
• 22:52   Re: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c Tom Lane

2 February 1999

• 00:17   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] [WEBMASTER] 'www/html main.html' Roland Roberts
• 01:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] big bad join problems Vadim Mikheev
• 01:02   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] [WEBMASTER] 'www/html main.html' Bruce Momjian
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c Bruce Momjian
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] big bad join problems Bruce Momjian
• 01:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] big bad join problems Vadim Mikheev
• 01:30   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] [WEBMASTER] 'www/html main.html' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] big bad join problems Dustin Sallings
• 01:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] big bad join problems Bruce Momjian
• 01:56   TEMP tables applied Bruce Momjian
• 03:34   Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:25   RE: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:44   trouble with rules Erich Stamberger
• 06:59   RE: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c Magnus Hagander
• 07:45   Re: [HACKERS] Patch (was: tough locale bug) Oleg Broytmann
• 07:48   Re: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c Oleg Broytmann
• 07:52   Re: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:01   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:02   Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev
• 08:14   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Vadim Mikheev
• 08:48   Re: [HACKERS] Patch (was: tough locale bug) Goran Thyni
• 09:15   Re: [HACKERS] Patch (was: tough locale bug) Oleg Broytmann
• 09:15   Backend problem with large objects Ian Grant
• 10:13   VACUUM problem Àíäðåé Íîâèêîâ
• 10:39   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM problem The Hermit Hacker
• 11:06   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:24   Re: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:10   Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:33   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE failed on linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:27   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 13:28   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE failed on linux jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:32   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:38   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON ... ORDER BY ... jose' soares
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof The Hermit Hacker
• 13:56   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON ... ORDER BY ... Herouth Maoz
• 14:24   Re: [HACKERS] New patch (was: tough bug) Oleg Broytmann
• 14:37   Re: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c Bruce Momjian
• 14:40   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Bruce Momjian
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:57   Re: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:18   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Bruce Momjian
• 16:22   ecpg patch Michael Meskes
• 16:37   Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Bruce Momjian
• 16:40   Re: [HACKERS] help bug and comment char. Bruce Momjian
• 16:42   Re: [HACKERS] help bug and comment char. Bruce Momjian
• 16:51   Re: [PATCHES] MB big5 support patch (current) Bruce Momjian
• 16:58   Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 17:08   Re: [HACKERS] Something wacko about EXPLAIN cost stats Bruce Momjian
• 17:20   Re: [HACKERS] Patch (was: tough locale bug) Bruce Momjian
• 17:20   Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Bruce Momjian
• 17:20   6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Hannu Krosing
• 17:21   Re: New patch (was: tough bug) Bruce Momjian
• 18:39   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian
• 18:43   Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Ian Grant
• 19:45   ... Sebestyen Zoltan
• 20:55   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:07   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Bruce Momjian
• 21:14   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:16   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Bruce Momjian
• 21:21   RE: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Jackson, DeJuan
• 21:57   PL/TCL bug (?) Daniele Orlandi
• 22:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgres for Sunos 4.1.4 Tom Lane

3 February 1999

• 03:50   Re: [HACKERS] PL/TCL bug (?) Marcus Mascari
• 05:02   template/alpha_cc Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:51   Re: [HACKERS] PL/TCL bug (?) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:16   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Hannu Krosing
• 08:38   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Hannu Krosing
• 09:07   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:24   RE: [HACKERS] Re: Postgres for Sunos 4.1.4 Horak Daniel
• 11:27   Blob BUG Since 6.4.2 Nicolas Prochazka
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch The Hermit Hacker
• 14:36   Minor change for UPDATE Daniele Orlandi
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc Tom Lane
• 15:43   Compiling on DEC Alpha OSF1 Dmitry Samersoff
• 15:50   Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc The Hermit Hacker
• 16:30   preprocessor question: prepare statement Michael Meskes
• 16:31   ecpg patch Michael Meskes
• 16:41   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Hannu Krosing
• 16:46   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Bruce Momjian
• 16:52   DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Dmitry Samersoff
• 17:11   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Bruce Momjian
• 17:35   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:08   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Tom Lane
• 18:10   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Bruce Momjian
• 19:30   Re: [GENERAL] Cost: Big Tables vs. Organized Separation of Data Bruce Momjian
• 23:01   Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc Tatsuo Ishii

4 February 1999

• 00:12   cleanup of optimizer Bruce Momjian
• 00:47   Re: [HACKERS] preprocessor question: prepare statement Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:53   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:15   Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc The Hermit Hacker
• 01:22   Re: Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Bruce Momjian
• 01:46   RE: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:58   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg patch The Hermit Hacker
• 07:25   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Dmitry Samersoff
• 08:11   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Pedro J. Lobo
• 08:44   Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc Pedro J. Lobo
• 09:48   Re: [HACKERS] preprocessor question: prepare statement Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 12:18   Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:19   Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:53   Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Bruce Momjian
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] preprocessor question: prepare statement Michael Meskes
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] preprocessor question: prepare statement Michael Meskes
• 14:59   small bug fix for ecpg Michael Meskes
• 15:14   Re: [HACKERS] small bug fix for ecpg Bruce Momjian
• 19:36   strange behaviour on pooled alloc jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:54   Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc Bruce Momjian
• 20:01   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian
• 20:46   Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Ian Grant
• 21:04   where to declare system operators Jackson, DeJuan
• 21:29   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian
• 23:05   Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Tatsuo Ishii

5 February 1999

• 01:24   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:38   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Bruce Momjian
• 02:13   Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Tom Lane
• 02:28   Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Bruce Momjian
• 02:54   SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane
• 03:27   Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Bruce Momjian
• 03:28   Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Bruce Momjian
• 04:13   Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane
• 04:40   Re: [HACKERS] preprocessor question: prepare statement Michael Meskes
• 10:29   Email change Michael Meskes
• 10:29   Re: [HACKERS] small bug fix for ecpg Michael Meskes
• 10:30   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes
• 11:28   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems geek+@cmu.edu
• 11:56   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:02   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:30   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Bruce Momjian
• 15:30   Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Bruce Momjian
• 15:37   Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres Limitations Tom Lane
• 15:47   Re: postgres bug? Bruce Momjian
• 16:09   Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane
• 16:52   Bugs in snapshot Jackson, DeJuan
• 17:32   char(n) default '' crashes server Erich Stamberger
• 20:24   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian
• 21:07   Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 gjerde@icebox.org
• 22:06   Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres Limitations Peter T Mount

6 February 1999

• 00:27   Ignore me :) Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 gjerde@icebox.org
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Thomas Reinke
• 07:03   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 The Hermit Hacker
• 10:35   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Hannu Krosing
• 11:01   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian
• 12:22   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:08   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:29   Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Tom Lane
• 15:52   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian
• 18:33   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes
• 18:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane
• 23:14   Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Tom Lane

7 February 1999

• 04:24   One I've never seen before: The Hermit Hacker
• 04:39   Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: The Hermit Hacker
• 09:39   Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:59   Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: Bruce Momjian
• 11:25   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount
• 12:03   Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc (fwd) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: The Hermit Hacker
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount
• 15:25   v6.4.3 ? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:45   Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Tom Lane
• 16:04   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane
• 16:24   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane
• 16:39   RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Stupor Genius
• 16:47   Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Tom Lane
• 17:36   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:12   Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: Bruce Momjian
• 18:22   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount
• 18:26   Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:32   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian
• 18:37   Re: [HACKERS] Problems building some libraries in 6.4.2 Tom Lane
• 18:47   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:50   Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Bruce Momjian
• 19:04   RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount
• 19:11   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:25   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:04   Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Tom Lane
• 20:29   libpq++ Oliver Elphick
• 20:33   RE: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber
• 20:34   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Tom Lane
• 20:51   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane
• 21:01   RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 gjerde@icebox.org
• 21:06   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:52   RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount
• 22:08   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane
• 22:14   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 22:14   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Sascha Schumann
• 22:27   Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Sascha Schumann
• 22:33   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Hannu Krosing
• 23:03   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:20   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Taral
• 23:53   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

8 February 1999

• 00:46   Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Marc Howard Zuckman
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian
• 01:05   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane
• 01:12   Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc (fwd) Vadim Mikheev
• 01:19   Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Tom Lane
• 01:29   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Bruce Momjian
• 01:30   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Bruce Momjian
• 01:48   Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Bruce Momjian
• 02:28   Added \p\g to psql Bruce Momjian
• 04:26   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes
• 05:02   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount
• 06:51   Re: [HACKERS] Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Oleg Broytmann
• 08:33   sequence dump/reload Oleg Broytmann
• 08:47   writing a JAVA interface for postgres Pascal GEND
• 08:59   Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc (fwd) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:56   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:06   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 10:38   VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 10:46   VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 11:08   libpq questuion Dmitry Samersoff
• 11:15   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Cary O'Brien
• 11:20   Version numbering Cary O'Brien
• 11:32   Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Terry Mackintosh
• 12:06   Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:40   Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Thomas Reinke
• 12:41   RE: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Dan Gowin
• 12:41   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questuion jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:03   Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Nick Bastin
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Bruce Momjian
• 13:35   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:01   Commercial support, things considered Terry Mackintosh
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Tom Lane
• 14:15   RE: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Dan Gowin
• 14:19   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane
• 14:20   TIME QUALIFICATION jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:23   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:34   Re: [HACKERS] Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:34   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Tom Lane
• 14:38   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:57   Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:32   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian
• 15:35   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:39   Keywords Michael Meskes
• 15:39   Embedded SQL question Michael Meskes
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Michael Meskes
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Michael Meskes
• 15:50   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? The Hermit Hacker
• 16:03   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian
• 16:08   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:31   Optimizer problems Bruce Momjian
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Bruce Momjian
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian
• 17:18   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount
• 17:21   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount
• 17:27   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer problems jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:31   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer problems Bruce Momjian
• 18:33   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount
• 19:17   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Thomas Reinke
• 19:29   samekeys Bruce Momjian
• 21:56   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane
• 22:02   HAVING bug in 6.4.2 Oliver Elphick
• 22:03   Re: [HACKERS] samekeys Tom Lane
• 23:35   Datetime input-parsing shortcoming Tom Lane

9 February 1999

• 00:21   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Vadim Mikheev
• 00:50   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:03   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian
• 01:56   Optimizer fix Bruce Momjian
• 04:14   Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes
• 04:57   Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION Vadim Mikheev
• 05:00   samekeys Bruce Momjian
• 06:01   RE: [HACKERS] libpq questuion Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:16   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 07:14   AW: [HACKERS] Embedded SQL question Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 07:44   Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:46   AW: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 10:08   Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION Vadim Mikheev
• 10:53   Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:21   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Hannu Krosing
• 11:59   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount
• 12:40   Timestamp fileds into index Ricardo J.C.Coelho
• 12:48   RE: [HACKERS] Timestamp fileds into index Dan Gowin
• 12:52   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:55   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Datetime input-parsing shortcoming Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:15   Error dropping indexes Chris Williams
• 13:20   Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp fileds into index Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:53   Re: RES: [HACKERS] Timestamp fileds into index Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:06   Re: [HACKERS] samekeys Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane
• 15:00   Re: [HACKERS] samekeys Bruce Momjian
• 15:00   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian
• 16:32   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:44   Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Michael Meskes
• 20:06   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount
• 21:13   Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Hannu Krosing

10 February 1999

• 00:02   NEXTSTEP porting problems Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:28   Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION Vadim Mikheev
• 00:28   Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:43   cannot cast bpchar and varchar Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:00   PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar
• 01:18   PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar
• 01:23   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? The Hermit Hacker
• 01:23   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:01   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:09   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 02:16   RE: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar
• 02:16   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:32   Re: [HACKERS] cannot cast bpchar and varchar Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:29   Re: [HACKERS] Embedded SQL question Michael Meskes
• 04:57   Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Michael Meskes
• 06:25   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Oleg Broytmann
• 06:56   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:59   Re: [HACKERS] cannot cast bpchar and varchar Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:21   Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:07   AW: [HACKERS] NEXTSTEP porting problems Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 11:31   Re: [GENERAL] A mistake generates strange result Postgres DBA
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Tom Lane
• 13:11   Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] A mistake generates strange result Tom Lane
• 13:21   Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Hannu Krosing
• 13:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] A mistake generates strange result Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] A mistake generates strange result Bruce Momjian
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] A mistake generates strange result Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:13   ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: [ANNOUNCE] Database Entry: Bruce Korb
• 16:00   RECEIPE jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:01   regex + locale bug Angelos Karageorgiou
• 16:09   RE: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar
• 17:00   Re: [HACKERS] RECEIPE Bruce Momjian
• 17:32   ... Angelos Karageorgiou
• 17:44   Possible bug on update Jackson, DeJuan
• 20:53   Multiples concatenation operator (||) Ricardo J.C.Coelho
• 21:30   Re: [HACKERS] Multiples concatenation operator (||) Bruce Momjian
• 23:26   New results for GEQO threshold Tom Lane

11 February 1999

• 00:36   interface libpq Makefile.in patch Ryan Bradetich
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] interface libpq Makefile.in patch Bruce Momjian
• 03:09   Re: [HACKERS] cannot cast bpchar and varchar Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:09   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:21   Re: [HACKERS] interface libpq Makefile.in patch Tom Lane
• 04:09   Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Michael Meskes
• 04:54   Re: [HACKERS] interface libpq Makefile.in patch Michael Meskes
• 07:57   Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:33   Re: [SQL] RULE questions. D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 10:44   PQsocket D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 13:24   Re: your mail Oleg Broytmann
• 13:30   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Tom Lane
• 13:30   Re: your mail Oleg Broytmann
• 13:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] RULE questions. Tom Lane
• 13:37   Re: [HACKERS] PQsocket Tom Lane
• 13:46   Re: your mail Oleg Broytmann
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION Bruce Momjian
• 14:02   Re: your mail Oleg Broytmann
• 14:32   date_part() BUG? Roberto Joao Lopes Garcia
• 14:36   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 15:04   Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION Vadim Mikheev
• 15:10   Re: [HACKERS] date_part() BUG? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:13   Temp tables Jackson, DeJuan
• 15:20   ... Allan C. Lemos
• 15:38   Re: [HACKERS] date_part() BUG? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] RULE questions. Hannu Krosing
• 15:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] RULE questions. jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] Temp tables Bruce Momjian
• 16:49   Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] RULE questions. D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 17:10   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? The Hermit Hacker
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 17:58   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] RULE questions. jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:04   BOUNCE pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org: Imbalanced parentheses or angle brackets owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
• 19:50   RE: [HACKERS] Temp tables Jackson, DeJuan
• 20:00   optimizer is broken Bruce Momjian
• 20:56   Type conversion Ricardo J.C.Coelho
• 21:00   Re: [HACKERS] Temp tables Bruce Momjian
• 21:08   RE: [HACKERS] Temp tables Jackson, DeJuan
• 21:43   Re: [HACKERS] interface libpq Makefile.in patch Tom Lane
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] Temp tables Bruce Momjian

12 February 1999

• 00:07   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane
• 00:26   Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION Vadim Mikheev
• 01:10   Re: [HACKERS] Type conversion Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:56   Optimizer is fixed, and faster Bruce Momjian
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster Todd Graham Lewis
• 08:27   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 08:29   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 09:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Oleg Broytmann
• 11:56   Re: [HACKERS] view? Jose' Soares
• 12:20   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster The Hermit Hacker
• 12:20   Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:39   More postmaster troubles Daryl W. Dunbar
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster Bruce Momjian
• 15:08   Re: [HACKERS] RULE (and ALTER TABLE) questions Hannu Krosing
• 17:10   Re: [HACKERS] RULE (and ALTER TABLE) questions jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

13 February 1999

• 02:12   8K block limit Ken Mort
• 04:07   Re: [HACKERS] More postmaster troubles Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:08   JDBC lo crashes etc (fwd) Peter T Mount
• 09:50   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 12:17   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster Cary O'Brien
• 12:41   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:50   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 16:23   RE: [HACKERS] More postmaster troubles Daryl W. Dunbar
• 18:03   Failures in 'rules' regression test Tom Lane
• 18:23   Re: [HACKERS] More postmaster troubles Tom Lane
• 18:34   RE: [HACKERS] More postmaster troubles Daryl W. Dunbar
• 20:50   Source code cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 21:15   RE: [HACKERS] More postmaster troubles Michael Davis
• 22:13   Transaction logging? Michael Davis
• 22:49   Transaction logging? Michael Davis
• 22:54   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction logging? Marc Howard Zuckman

14 February 1999

• 02:19   Patches applied for v6.4.3 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:34   Re: [HACKERS] Failures in 'rules' regression test Patrick Welche
• 17:21   bushy plans Bruce Momjian
• 18:03   Bug in user defined types in postgres?! (fwd) Petr Danecek
• 18:03   Bug in user defined types in postgres?! Petr Danecek
• 19:59   ... Oscar Cabello
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster Ryan Bradetich
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster Bruce Momjian

15 February 1999

• 00:22   Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans Vadim Mikheev
• 00:30   Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans Bruce Momjian
• 00:33   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster Vadim Mikheev
• 00:35   Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans Bruce Momjian
• 00:36   Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans Vadim Mikheev
• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans Bruce Momjian
• 00:39   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster Bruce Momjian
• 00:58   Re: [HACKERS] JDBC lo crashes etc (fwd) Thomas Reinke
• 01:01   Is the int8_ops being implimented? Ryan Bradetich
• 01:03   Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans Vadim Mikheev
• 02:05   Confirmation for subscribe pgsql-hackers bhavesh
• 03:31   Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans Bruce Momjian
• 03:56   Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans Bruce Momjian
• 05:10   Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans Vadim Mikheev
• 05:12   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in user defined types in postgres?! (fwd) Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 05:24   Re: [HACKERS] Source code cleanup Michael Meskes
• 09:19   Re: [HACKERS] Failures in 'rules' regression test jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:13   Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump query about views jose' soares
• 15:41   Creating textfile from postgres tables Martin Möderndorfer
• 16:30   Re: [HACKERS] Source code cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] Source code cleanup Michael Meskes
• 17:20   Re: [HACKERS] Source code cleanup Bruce Momjian

16 February 1999

• 02:25   8K block limit Ken Mort
• 04:11   Odd error message: insert into...select from ... The Hermit Hacker
• 04:14   Might already be fixed...? The Hermit Hacker
• 07:34   varchar function jose' soares
• 12:55   [Fwd: [HACKERS] JDBC lo crashes etc (fwd)] Thomas Reinke
• 17:06   Help for running initdb Randy Singh
• 18:26   Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit Peter T Mount

17 February 1999

• 06:23   Problem in Compiling Mohamed Salah-Al-Din Hefny
• 06:41   Postgres Compilation Error Mohamed Salah-Al-Din Hefny
• 10:04   varchar function jose' soares
• 12:03   Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:19   interface between backend and dynamicly loaded modules Horak Daniel
• 13:35   Re: [HACKERS] Is the int8_ops being implimented? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:47   Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit Peter T Mount
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit Bruce Momjian
• 15:03   unsubscribe Eric Blood
• 15:18   What does this mean? Jackson, DeJuan
• 16:46   6.4.3? and version numbers Terry Mackintosh
• 17:58   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3? and version numbers The Hermit Hacker
• 20:04   Continued problems with pgdump, Large Objects and crashing backends Peter T Mount
• 20:40   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3? and version numbers Peter T Mount
• 20:58   Re: [HACKERS] Continued problems with pgdump, Large Objects and crashing backends Tom Lane
• 21:52   [HACKERS] unsubscribe hsryu@daou.co.kr
• 22:48   Bushy Plans fixed Bruce Momjian
• 23:37   RE: [HACKERS] 8K block limit Stupor Genius

18 February 1999

• 00:00   Re: [HACKERS] Bushy Plans fixed The Hermit Hacker
• 00:58   Re: [HACKERS] Bushy Plans fixed Vadim Mikheev
• 01:09   Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:17   Re: [HACKERS] varchar function Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:17   Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit Vadim Mikheev
• 01:24   Re: [HACKERS] What does this mean? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:26   6.4.3? Terry Mackintosh
• 01:34   Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:36   Re: [HACKERS] Bushy Plans fixed Bruce Momjian
• 01:58   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3? The Hermit Hacker
• 01:59   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3? and version numbers D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 02:35   Re: [HACKERS] Bushy Plans fixed Vadim Mikheev
• 02:42   Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit Vadim Mikheev
• 02:43   Re: [HACKERS] Bushy Plans fixed Bruce Momjian
• 02:57   Re: [HACKERS] Bushy Plans fixed Vadim Mikheev
• 03:10   Re: [HACKERS] Bushy Plans fixed Bruce Momjian
• 05:25   Re: [HACKERS] Continued problems with pgdump, Large Objects and crashing backends Peter T Mount
• 08:50   RE: [HACKERS] 8K block limit Stupor Genius
• 09:06   AW: [HACKERS] 8K block limit Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] Continued problems with pgdump, Large Objects and crashing backends Tom Lane
• 15:32   UnDelete? Postgres DBA
• 16:33   Re: [HACKERS] UnDelete? Hannu Krosing
• 17:27   CVS overwrite on merge fail? Clark Evans
• 17:36   Re: [HACKERS] CVS overwrite on merge fail? Egon Schmid
• 17:54   Re: [HACKERS] CVS overwrite on merge fail? Bruce Momjian
• 18:11   6.4 Build Error from CVS snapshot Clark Evans
• 18:32   6.4 Build Error from CVS snapshot Clark Evans
• 18:58   RE: [HACKERS] 6.4 Build Error from CVS snapshot Vince Vielhaber
• 19:02   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Build Error from CVS snapshot Bruce Momjian
• 20:04   Re: [HACKERS] Continued problems with pgdump, Large Objects and crashing backends Peter T Mount
• 20:14   large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Ron Snyder

19 February 1999

• 04:58   Max backend limits cleaned up Tom Lane
• 12:17   Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:17   What does it means? Dmitry Samersoff
• 15:45   Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? The Hermit Hacker
• 16:31   lower() broken? Vince Vielhaber
• 16:50   Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Ron Snyder
• 17:28   New optimizer README Bruce Momjian
• 20:38   RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar

20 February 1999

• 00:19   Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:45   Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:39   RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? The Hermit Hacker
• 01:43   Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? Vince Vielhaber
• 01:50   RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar
• 02:48   RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:50   Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? Roland Roberts
• 02:59   Re: [SQL] SQL-Query 2 get primary key D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 03:02   Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? Vince Vielhaber
• 04:17   Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 10:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] SQL-Query 2 get primary key Hannu Krosing
• 14:05   A few questions (was: SQL-Query 2 get primary key) Hannu Krosing
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] SQL-Query 2 get primary key Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:26   RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar
• 17:22   RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar
• 19:41   Bug in src/backend/nodes/print.c James Thompson
• 19:50   Re: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? Tom Lane

21 February 1999

• 01:48   Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Tom Lane
• 02:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian
• 16:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Tom Lane
• 16:58   Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Tom Lane
• 17:28   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian
• 17:29   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Bruce Momjian
• 18:52   Update contributors page Bruce Momjian
• 19:32   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Bruce Momjian
• 20:30   Re: [HACKERS] Update contributors page D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 20:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian
• 20:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian

22 February 1999

• 00:54   inet data type regression test fails Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:58   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/test/regress/expected rules.out' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:30   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/test/regress/expected rules.out' Bruce Momjian
• 04:02   optimizer cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 04:30   lappend vs. lcons Bruce Momjian
• 04:32   New source control system Taral
• 04:57   Re: start on outer join Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:06   Re: [HACKERS] optimizer cleanup Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:30   Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:35   Tables names from query Philip Shiels
• 07:42   Playing with postgres Mohamed Hefny
• 08:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/test/regress/expected rules.out' jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:09   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:31   SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT) Oleg Broytmann
• 11:46   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT) Andy Selle
• 12:09   Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Tom Lane
• 13:44   Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? jose' soares
• 14:07   RE: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Michael Davis
• 14:08   RE: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Daryl W. Dunbar
• 14:16   Problem with complex join Oleg Broytmann
• 14:47   Re: [HACKERS] optimizer cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 14:47   Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Bruce Momjian
• 14:47   Re: start on outer join Bruce Momjian
• 14:49   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian
• 14:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian
• 15:17   RE: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Daryl W. Dunbar
• 15:41   Re: Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Tom Lane
• 15:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian
• 19:28   Updated developers list Bruce Momjian
• 20:16   Developers FAQ Bruce Momjian
• 21:26   discussion on proposed int8_ops patch Ryan Bradetich
• 22:00   subscribe Chuang Fang-sheng
• 22:10   copyObject() ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:50   Re: Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Tom Lane

23 February 1999

• 00:24   Re: [HACKERS] Updated developers list RHS Linux User
• 00:49   Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:58   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/test/regress/expected rules.out' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] Updated developers list Bruce Momjian
• 01:13   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:53   Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:57   Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Future: Postgres on Digital Alpha Bruce Momjian
• 02:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Bruce Momjian
• 06:14   Error messages, outer joins, etc Thomas G. Lockhart
• 11:17   Alterations to backend/client protocol Philip Shiels
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Tom Lane
• 13:17   Re: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? Tom Lane
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? Bruce Momjian
• 13:33   postmaster fails with 2-23 snapshot Brian P Millett
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] Alterations to backend/client protocol Tom Lane
• 13:41   postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Brian P Millett
• 16:07   Re: [HACKERS] discussion on proposed int8_ops patch Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:19   RE: [GENERAL] Transaction logging Michael Davis
• 21:54   quick Date question Jackson, DeJuan
• 22:04   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Lane
• 23:39   RE: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Daryl W. Dunbar

24 February 1999

• 01:03   Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:07   Re: [GENERAL] Transaction logging Bruce Momjian
• 01:17   Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Bruce Momjian
• 02:34   RE: [HACKERS] Transaction logging Michael Davis
• 02:43   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction logging Bruce Momjian
• 02:43   list limit for IN predicate? Dennis Roesler
• 02:44   RE: list limit for IN predicate? Douglas.Inkster@cai.com (Inkster, Douglas)
• 02:46   IN list and OR processing Bruce Momjian
• 03:04   KTH-KRB kerberos 4 patch Rodney McDuff
• 07:49   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 07:59   OUTER joins Bruce Momjian
• 08:30   Re: [HACKERS] OUTER joins Bruce Momjian
• 11:03   Problem with complex query Oleg Broytmann
• 12:13   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Brian P Millett
• 12:29   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction logging jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:58   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane
• 13:24   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query Tom Lane
• 13:28   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Vince Vielhaber
• 13:34   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Lane
• 13:36   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query Oleg Broytmann
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 13:59   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: Bruce Momjian
• 15:32   Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: Bruce Momjian
• 15:34   Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Ron Snyder
• 16:36   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane
• 18:05   RE: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Dan Gowin
• 19:11   OUTER joins Bruce Momjian
• 19:34   RE: [HACKERS] OUTER joins Michael Davis
• 21:36   timezones revisited Vince Vielhaber
• 22:06   Praise RHS Linux User
• 23:42   Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:51   BTW, datetime is busted in REL6_4 branch Tom Lane
• 23:55   RE: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? Hiroshi Inoue

25 February 1999

• 03:09   libpq and SPI Gerald L. Gay
• 03:15   Current tree is busted Tom Lane
• 04:52   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 04:53   Re: [HACKERS] KTH-KRB kerberos 4 patch Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 05:33   [CURRENT] large object fix Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:59   RE: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 08:53   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 12:30   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Lane
• 12:35   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane
• 12:44   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 12:55   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Tom Lane
• 13:16   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot The Hermit Hacker
• 13:34   Foreign Keys Michael Davis
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Angelos Karageorgiou
• 14:16   Re: [INTERFACES] Foreign Keys Byron Nikolaidis
• 14:48   RE: [INTERFACES] Foreign Keys Michael Davis
• 14:51   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Brian P Millett
• 14:51   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:28   Re: [HACKERS] Current tree is busted Bruce Momjian
• 15:38   Linux: semaphores: How? Terry Mackintosh
• 15:42   Re: [HACKERS] Linux: semaphores: How? Oleg Broytmann
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Bruce Momjian
• 15:59   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Bruce Momjian
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Bruce Momjian
• 16:25   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Ross J. Reedstrom
• 17:10   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot The Hermit Hacker
• 18:40   ... budin
• 20:50   shouldn't pg_dumpall... Vince Vielhaber
• 21:17   RE: [HACKERS] Linux: semaphores: How? Daryl W. Dunbar
• 21:31   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Lane
• 22:15   Re: [HACKERS] shouldn't pg_dumpall... Tom Lane
• 23:06   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Gerald L. Gay

26 February 1999

• 05:24   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 08:56   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 21:14   Web page mail archive Ryan Bradetich
• 22:11   Inherit View Clark Evans

27 February 1999

• 14:52   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI frankpit@pop.dn.net

28 February 1999

• 06:16   Test 2...news2mail ... scrappy@hub.org (Marc G. Fournier)
• 15:16   hello dana lapidot
• 20:16   Testing news2mail gateway ... marc@acadiau.ca (Marc G. Fournier)
• 22:03   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Gerald L. Gay
• 22:16   Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI glgay@pass.korea.army.mil ("Gerald L. Gay")
• 22:46   pgsql-loophole@postgresql.org The Hermit Hacker
• 22:50   IMPORTANT NOTICE: pgsql-loophole@postgresql.org The Hermit Hacker
• 23:16   pgsql-loophole@postgresql.org scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker)
• 23:16   IMPORTANT NOTICE: pgsql-loophole@postgresql.org scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker)
• 23:20   IMPORTANT NOTICE II: pgsql-loophole@postgresql.org The Hermit Hacker