Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> I'm seeing several other regress failures that seem to be caused by
>> the same SELECT INTO problem.
> One idea. Can you cvs a version before the temp table stuff, and see if
> they pass?
They were all passing a week or so ago. Since it works for you (and
apparently for the rest of the crew), I have to assume there's some
platform-dependent bug in the new temp table stuff. I'll try to dig
into it tomorrow --- but if you have any thoughts about the most likely
places to look, please let me know.
regards, tom lane