Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes
Date
Msg-id 199902080348.WAA04656@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> Note to hackers: is there a good reason why indexes are more
> restrictive?  Offhand it seems like the same physical-equivalence
> trick could be applied.

What do you mean by restrictive.  If you mean:

    * allow creation of functional indexes to use default types

It is on the TODO list, and has been for a while.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Added \p\g to psql