Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?
Date
Msg-id 199902072033.PAA15804@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to v6.4.3 ?  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
>     3.  Test  the second bugfix release with the result of step 2
>         and upgrade production. If the first bugfix  release  can
>         stand  for  a  time  long  enough  without  further  bugs
>         reported, use that for this step.
> 
>     4.  Follow subsequent bugfix releases if the fixes in them do
>         or could be expected to happen in the production.
> 
>     Doing it this way means, that a mission critical installation
>     will use v6.4.* until some time after we've put out at  least
>     v6.5.1. Thus, we should care about them.

Now I see why you patching against 6.4.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems building some libraries in 6.4.2