AW: [HACKERS] NEXTSTEP porting problems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
Subject AW: [HACKERS] NEXTSTEP porting problems
Date
Msg-id 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C60267B2F3@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
> What about using #if 0 or #if PG_FALSE or whatever instead of #if> FALSE?

I think the consensus was to use:

#ifdef NOT_USED

in these cases

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION
Next
From: Postgres DBA
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] A mistake generates strange result