RE: [HACKERS] 8K block limit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stupor Genius
Subject RE: [HACKERS] 8K block limit
Date
Msg-id 002401be5adf$434429a0$e0e7accf@darren
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > I think some file systems are more optimised for 8K blocks. I may be
> > thinking on the original reason for the 8k limit in the first 
> > place, but I remember there was discussions about this when the block
> > size was altered.
> 
> Yes, most UFS file systems use 8k blocks/2k fragments.  It allows write
> of block in one i/o operation.

The max is 32k because of the aforementioned 15 bits available, but I'd
be a bit cautious of trying it.  When I put this in, the highest I could
get to work on AIX was 16k.  Pushing it up to 32k caused major breakage
in the system internals.  Had to reboot the machine and fsck the file
system.  Some files were linked incorrectly, other files disappeared, etc,
a real mess.

Not sure exactly what it corrupted, but I'd try the 32k limit on a non-
production system first...

Darren


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Bushy Plans fixed
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bushy Plans fixed