Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Date
Msg-id 22529.917969222@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
>     [ patch to handle small-block allocation specially ]
>     Did anyone play around with it? I've had it installed now for
>     some days and it work's well so far.
>     How close are we to v6.5 BETA? Should I apply it to  CURRENT?

Well, I think it's a band-aid until we can redesign the memory manager
properly, but it could be a useful band-aid ... might as well put it in.

The only thing that bothers me about the code itself is lack of
comments.  In particular it'd be nice to mention somewhere that freeptr
is actually one chunkheader past the start of the free space --- took
a while to puzzle that out.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE failed on linux
Next
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE failed on linux