Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vadim Mikheev
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit
Date
Msg-id 36CB862D.22FCF6FA@krs.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> 
> But modern Unixes have read/write ahead i/o if it seems a sequential
> access, don't they. I did some testing on my LinuxPPC box.
> 
> 0. create table t2(i int,c char(4000));
> 1. time psql -c "copy t2 from '/tmp/aaa'" test
>    (aaa has 5120 records and this will create 20MB table)
> 2. time psql -c "select count(*) from t2" test
> 3. total time of the regression test
> 
> o result of testing 1
> 
>  8K: 0.02user 0.04system 3:26.20elapsed
> 32K: 0.03user 0.06system 0:48.25elapsed
> 
>   32K is 4 times faster than 8k!
> 
> o result of testing 2
> 
>  8K: 0.02user 0.04system 6:00.31elapsed
> 32K: 0.04user 0.02system 1:02.13elapsed
> 
>  32K is neary 6 times faster than 8k!

Did you use the same -B for 8K and 32K ?
You should use 4x buffers in 8K case!

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] varchar function
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What does this mean?