Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 January 1999

• 02:16   NAN code Bruce Momjian
• 02:23   NAN code Bruce Momjian
• 02:50   Re: 2 patches Bruce Momjian
• 13:12   XML (was: 2 patches) Goran Thyni
• 18:12   COMPUTER STOCK ON SALE /CPU/MEMORY/MOBILE.......ETC. PP789717@vasia.com
• 18:52   Re: XML (was: 2 patches) Bruce Momjian
• 21:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) Goran Thyni
• 21:44   XML-Data Goran Thyni
• 22:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) Goran Thyni
• 23:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) Bruce Momjian
• 23:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) The Hermit Hacker

2 January 1999

• 01:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) The Hermit Hacker
• 15:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) Tom Lane
• 16:22   Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) Goran Thyni
• 20:17   Error creating index Vince Vielhaber
• 20:35   snapshot and FreeBSD-2.2.7 not building Hal Snyder

3 January 1999

• 00:42   Re: [HACKERS] snapshot and FreeBSD-2.2.7 not building Bruce Momjian
• 00:54   Re: [HACKERS] snapshot and FreeBSD-2.2.7 not building Bruce Momjian
• 01:51   Re: [HACKERS] snapshot and FreeBSD-2.2.7 not building Hal Snyder
• 03:30   Re: [HACKERS] snapshot and FreeBSD-2.2.7 not building Bruce Momjian
• 11:51   Re: Date/time fixes for HAVE_TM_ZONE platforms Oleg Broytmann
• 22:55   include-file unhappiness Tom Lane

4 January 1999

• 01:28   Re: [HACKERS] include-file unhappiness Bruce Momjian
• 01:49   Reloading a 6.3db into 6.4.1 Stan Brown
• 02:46   Re: [HACKERS] Reloading a 6.3db into 6.4.1t Bruce Momjian
• 04:22   Re: [HACKERS] Error creating index Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:06   Re: [HACKERS] Error creating index jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:07   Re: [HACKERS] NAN code jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:16   Re: [HACKERS] snapshot and FreeBSD-2.2.7 not building jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:03   Re: [HACKERS] create rule jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:01   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:05   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:06   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:07   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:10   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:11   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:12   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:14   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:17   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:23   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:25   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:29   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:30   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:31   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 11:37   Re: [HACKERS] a test jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:56   Re: [HACKERS] a test The Hermit Hacker
• 12:05   Re: [HACKERS] a test jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:16   SQLJ Dan Gowin
• 12:22   money bug Sferacarta Software
• 12:22   int4 range Sferacarta Software
• 12:22   bug on Subselect with GROUP BY clause Sferacarta Software
• 12:22   too many ANDs ? Sferacarta Software
• 12:22   Re: [HACKERS] a test The Hermit Hacker
• 12:29   Re: [HACKERS] NAN code orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de!wieck@sapserv.debis.de
• 12:29   Re: [HACKERS] Error creating index orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de!wieck@sapserv.debis.de
• 12:29   Re: [HACKERS] snapshot and FreeBSD-2.2.7 not building orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de!wieck@sapserv.debis.de
• 12:30   Re: [HACKERS] a test orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de!wieck@sapserv.debis.de
• 12:38   Re: [HACKERS] NAN code Hal Snyder
• 12:47   Re: [HACKERS] SQLJ Constantin Teodorescu
• 14:00   Re: Date/time fixes for HAVE_TM_ZONE platforms Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] NAN code Bruce Momjian
• 14:08   Q: CURSOR tuples count Vazsonyi Peter[ke]
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] SQLJ jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:12   Q: Log, via triggers Vazsonyi Peter[ke]
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] NAN code Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] NAN code jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] SQLJ Constantin Teodorescu
• 14:56   6.4.2? Hal Snyder
• 15:16   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.2? The Hermit Hacker
• 15:40   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.2? Bruce Momjian
• 15:48   Problems building some libraries in 6.4.2 Constantin Teodorescu
• 15:49   Re: pg_options ? Massimo Dal Zotto
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.2? Hal Snyder
• 16:18   Re: [HACKERS] NAN code Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] NAN code jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:01   XML/SGML Clark Evans

5 January 1999

• 00:34   Still having trouble importing 6.3 DB Stan Brown
• 01:19   Re: [HACKERS] Still having trouble importing 6.3 DB Tom Lane
• 01:31   Re: [HACKERS] Still having trouble importing 6.3 DB Bruce Momjian
• 05:18   Re: pg_options ? Blashko Alexander
• 06:02   [test] ignore this Marc G. Fournier
• 06:03   [test] ignore this Marc G. Fournier
• 06:55   NaN format Marcus Mascari
• 07:31   Re: [HACKERS] Still having trouble importing 6.3 DB Angelos Karageorgiou
• 07:47   RE: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:58   Re: Date/time fixes for HAVE_TM_ZONE platforms Oleg Broytmann
• 07:59   Re: NaN format jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:51   ./configure: conftest.sh not found Oleg Broytmann
• 11:38   FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Vadim Mikheev
• 12:55   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:12   PL/PGSQL bug using aggregates Michael Contzen
• 13:34   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Vadim Mikheev
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Clark Evans
• 14:04   Re: [HACKERS] Still having trouble importing 6.3 DB Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: Date/time fixes for HAVE_TM_ZONE platforms Oleg Broytmann
• 14:34   Re: [HACKERS] ./configure: conftest.sh not found Bruce Momjian
• 15:16   Re: Date/time fixes for HAVE_TM_ZONE platforms Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Date/time fixes for HAVE_TM_ZONE platforms Oleg Broytmann
• 17:33   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Bruce Momjian
• 18:12   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? The Hermit Hacker
• 19:02   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ?] Bruce Momjian
• 19:02   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Bruce Momjian
• 22:20   6.3 -> 6.4.2 upgrade question Stan Brown
• 22:27   RE: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:30   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ?] Bruce Momjian
• 23:58   Re: [GENERAL] Views Vadim Mikheev

6 January 1999

• 00:08   Re: [HACKERS] SQLJ Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:22   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Views Bruce Momjian
• 00:29   Numeric type Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:33   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric type Bruce Momjian
• 01:48   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Vadim Mikheev
• 01:51   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Bruce Momjian
• 02:16   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Vadim Mikheev
• 02:25   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Bruce Momjian
• 02:26   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ?] Vadim Mikheev
• 02:28   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Vadim Mikheev
• 02:41   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Vadim Mikheev
• 02:46   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Bruce Momjian
• 04:51   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Clark Evans
• 05:27   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Clark Evans
• 05:48   PL/PGSQL bug when using aggregates (repost) Michael Contzen
• 06:01   Re: [HACKERS] FOR SHARE LOCK clause ? Bruce Momjian
• 06:19   Re: Stale porting list? Billy G. Allie
• 07:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Views jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:35   Re: [DOCS] Postgresql INSTALL-file & Windows Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:44   RE: [DOCS] Postgresql INSTALL-file & Windows Magnus Hagander
• 12:56   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Postgresql INSTALL-file & Windows Horak Daniel
• 12:59   Re: [DOCS] Postgresql INSTALL-file & Windows Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:15   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric type Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:28   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric type Tom Lane
• 13:29   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric type jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:41   Libpq functions Magnus Hagander
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric type Bruce Momjian
• 14:42   problem with arrays Massimo Dal Zotto
• 14:44   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric type Oleg Bartunov
• 14:50   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric type jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:06   vacuum takes too long David Wetzel
• 19:21   Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long Bruce Momjian
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] SQLJ Peter T Mount
• 22:25   Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long David Wetzel
• 23:00   Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long Bruce Momjian
• 23:17   Re: [HACKERS] Libpq functions Tom Lane

7 January 1999

• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long The Hermit Hacker
• 00:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long Bruce Momjian
• 00:50   Re: [HACKERS] problem with arrays Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:52   Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types Bruce Momjian
• 01:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long The Hermit Hacker
• 01:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long Bruce Momjian
• 02:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long The Hermit Hacker
• 10:10   Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 10:38   Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 13:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Postgresql INSTALL-file & Windows Kevin Lo
• 13:40   Re: Postgresql INSTALL-file & Windows Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Postgresql INSTALL-file & Windows Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:41   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long Jackson, DeJuan
• 15:13   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long The Hermit Hacker
• 15:41   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long Jackson, DeJuan
• 15:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long Bruce Momjian
• 16:27   Outer Joins (and need CASE help) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:44   ecpg patch Michael Meskes
• 17:06   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long Jackson, DeJuan
• 17:07   ["G. Jayson Stangel" ] Questions? Hal Snyder
• 17:25   RE: Postgresql INSTALL-file & Windows Magnus Hagander
• 17:35   RE: [HACKERS] ["G. Jayson Stangel" ] Question s? Magnus Hagander
• 18:08   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg patch Bruce Momjian
• 18:24   RE: [HACKERS] Outer Joins (and need CASE help) Jackson, DeJuan
• 19:43   RE: [HACKERS] ["G. Jayson Stangel" ] Question s? Jackson, DeJuan

8 January 1999

• 03:33   Re: [HACKERS] Outer Joins (and need CASE help) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long The Hermit Hacker
• 11:27   New patches for running PostgreSQL on Windows Horak Daniel
• 14:10   postgres and year 2000 Massimo Dal Zotto
• 14:10   bug in CREATE USER Massimo Dal Zotto
• 14:10   some patches for 6.4.2 Massimo Dal Zotto
• 14:11   bug in libpgtcl listen Massimo Dal Zotto
• 14:30   Re: EXCEPT/INTERSECT for v6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 14:43   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:56   RE: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Dan Gowin
• 15:20   6.4 lateness and CIDR Paul A Vixie
• 15:40   SUM() and GROUP BY D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 15:54   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR The Hermit Hacker
• 16:13   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR Constantin Teodorescu
• 16:18   RE: [HACKERS] ["G. Jayson Stangel" ] Question s? Jackson, DeJuan
• 16:20   RE: [HACKERS] Outer Joins (and need CASE help) Jackson, DeJuan
• 17:06   Re: [HACKERS] ["G. Jayson Stangel" ] Question s? Jordan Henderson
• 18:27   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR Bruce Momjian
• 19:05   RE: [GENERAL] postgresql v6.4.2 c funcs and null text pointers... Jackson, DeJuan
• 19:08   RE: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR Jackson, DeJuan
• 19:10   Minor Persistent Bug In pg_dump Frank Morton
• 19:18   RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7.0? Jackson, DeJuan
• 19:47   Re: [GENERAL] postgresql v6.4.2 c funcs and null text pointers... Bruce Momjian

9 January 1999

• 00:41   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:13   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR The Hermit Hacker
• 01:35   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR Vince Vielhaber
• 06:57   Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7.0? Tom
• 07:29   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR The Hermit Hacker
• 11:00   RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7 Bruce Momjian
• 14:41   RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7 Bryan Field-Elliot
• 16:38   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:52   Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 17:11   Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7 Todd Graham Lewis
• 18:08   Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 18:11   Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7 Todd Graham Lewis
• 18:15   RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7 Tom
• 19:52   RE: [HACKERS] Libpq functions Magnus Hagander
• 20:13   Re: [HACKERS] Libpq functions Tom Lane
• 20:17   RE: [HACKERS] Libpq functions Magnus Hagander
• 22:41   TCL/TK configure problems Stan Brown
• 23:43   Re: [HACKERS] Libpq functions Bruce Momjian
• 23:48   Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7 Bruce Momjian

10 January 1999

• 00:50   pgdump and sequences Brook Milligan
• 07:36   Re: TCL/TK configure problems Karl Eichwalder
• 08:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: TCL/TK configure problems Bruce Momjian
• 12:19   max backends checking patch Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:30   Re: [HACKERS] max backends checking patch Vadim Mikheev
• 13:03   Re: [HACKERS] max backends checking patch Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:26   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Vadim Mikheev
• 15:05   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Vadim Mikheev
• 15:08   Re: [HACKERS] max backends checking patch Tom Lane
• 15:12   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Vadim Mikheev
• 15:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: TCL/TK configure problems Tom Lane
• 15:42   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:51   Re: TCL/TK configure problems Karl Eichwalder
• 16:08   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and dates (year 2000? not!) Thomas G. Lockhart

11 January 1999

• 05:01   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 05:27   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 The Hermit Hacker
• 07:58   WG: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 08:02   FOR UPDATE and VIEWs... Vadim Mikheev
• 11:41   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEYs (Was: Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7) Hannu Krosing
• 12:05   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEYs (Was: Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7) Vadim Mikheev
• 13:05   Re[2]: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Sferacarta Software
• 17:18   PQfinish in transactions Brook Milligan
• 17:42   CONSTRAINTS... Jackson, DeJuan
• 22:38   RE: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Hiroshi Inoue

12 January 1999

• 00:51   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:05   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:52   Re: [HACKERS] CONSTRAINTS... Hal Snyder
• 07:52   Re: WG: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Vadim Mikheev
• 11:38   Who is the maintainer of ALL the postgres Mailing lists Chris Williams
• 12:09   Re: [HACKERS] Who is the maintainer of ALL the postgres Mailing lists The Hermit Hacker
• 12:34   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Tom Lane
• 13:14   lock deadlocks Brook Milligan
• 13:38   SUM() and GROUP BY D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 13:58   Re[2]: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Sferacarta Software
• 14:39   Re: [HACKERS] CONSTRAINTS... Jose' Soares
• 15:30   Re: [HACKERS] lock deadlocks Bruce Momjian
• 17:55   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Tom Ivar Helbekkmo

13 January 1999

• 00:43   SUM() and GROUP BY D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 02:08   RPM maintainer? Clark Evans
• 04:04   Re: [HACKERS] RPM maintainer? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: EXCEPT/INTERSECT for v6.4 Clark Evans
• 04:18   Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: EXCEPT/INTERSECT for v6.4 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: EXCEPT/INTERSECT for v6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 06:07   AW: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 09:00   Re: [HACKERS] CONSTRAINTS... jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:18   Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:30   Re: [HACKERS] CONSTRAINTS... Bruce Momjian
• 10:28   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Massimo Dal Zotto
• 11:04   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 12:15   Re: [HACKERS] CONSTRAINTS... jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:18   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Tom Lane
• 13:18   Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY Tom Lane
• 13:20   Re: [HACKERS] RPM maintainer? Brook Milligan
• 13:24   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Tom Lane
• 13:27   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: EXCEPT/INTERSECT for v6.4 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:39   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] RPM maintainer? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:14   Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 14:18   CVS Branch Retrieval? Clark Evans
• 15:04   Re: [HACKERS] CVS Branch Retrieval? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:25   fix pg_dump to dump sequences created by SERIAL datatype Brook Milligan
• 15:40   Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY Tom Lane
• 15:51   references to packaged versions of PostgreSQL Brook Milligan
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY Bruce Momjian
• 16:03   Re: [HACKERS] references to packaged versions of PostgreSQL Hal Snyder
• 17:47   RE: [HACKERS] CONSTRAINTS... Jackson, DeJuan
• 17:50   pg_dump again Mikhail Terekhov
• 18:43   pg_dump again Mikhail Terekhov
• 19:11   Re: PostgreSQL 6.4.2 build problems on Linux/Alpha Oliver Elphick
• 19:11   Re: [HACKERS] references to packaged versions of PostgreSQL Oliver Elphick
• 21:55   RE: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Stupor Genius
• 22:10   unsubscribe SWagner17
• 22:25   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump again Tom Lane
• 23:53   Postgres 6.3.2 varchar <--> int4 conversions Roland Roberts

14 January 1999

• 04:14   Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:59   Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 08:38   Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 08:41   Re: [HACKERS] CONSTRAINTS... jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:03   ... Stefan Kapfhammer
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] CONSTRAINTS... Vadim Mikheev
• 17:33   Re: [HACKERS] CONSTRAINTS... jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:09   Re: [HACKERS] RPM maintainer? aldev
• 18:36   CVS.... Matthew C. Aycock
• 19:59   RE: [HACKERS] Novice Question Jackson, DeJuan
• 21:29   Re: [HACKERS] Novice Question Bruce Momjian
• 21:46   RE: [HACKERS] Novice Question Jackson, DeJuan

15 January 1999

• 00:01   Re: [HACKERS] CVS.... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:45   6.4.2 HP-UX makefile problem? Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:36   Time zones Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] CONSTRAINTS... Vadim Mikheev
• 04:26   identical joins on identical tables produce different output Charles Hornberger
• 04:39   Re: [HACKERS] Time zones Ross Johnson
• 05:12   Re: [HACKERS] Time zones Tom Lane
• 05:20   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.2 HP-UX makefile problem? Tom Lane
• 05:22   Re: [HACKERS] Time zones Ciaran Dunn
• 06:31   Re: [HACKERS] Time zones Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 09:29   Re: [HACKERS] Time zones Ross Johnson
• 12:53   Re: [HACKERS] Time zones Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:09   Compiling 6.4.2: Flex problem aldev
• 16:32   user-defined type and rtree index Ilya Varlashkin
• 17:09   Re: [HACKERS] CVS.... Matthew C. Aycock
• 17:47   Re: [HACKERS] CVS.... The Hermit Hacker
• 19:09   drop before create in pg_dump Brook Milligan
• 21:45   Re: [HACKERS] drop before create in pg_dump Tom Lane
• 22:39   Time Zones Vince Vielhaber

16 January 1999

• 00:22   Re: [HACKERS] CVS.... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:29   Re: [HACKERS] drop before create in pg_dump Roland Roberts
• 00:43   Re: [HACKERS] Time Zones Thomas G. Lockhart
• 02:00   Re: [HACKERS] drop before create in pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 02:45   Repository no longer compiles Taral
• 02:48   Unsubscribed? Taral
• 03:29   backend/utils/adt/float.c uses non-existent NAN value Taral
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/float.c uses non-existent NAN value Bruce Momjian
• 04:11   Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/float.c uses non-existent NAN value Taral
• 08:18   Help with cache flushing -- trying to implement TRUNCATE Marcus Mascari
• 20:52   doc/FAQ* files are hosed Tom Lane
• 22:15   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.2 HP-UX makefile problem? Tom Lane
• 23:44   Re: [HACKERS] doc/FAQ* files are hosed Bruce Momjian

17 January 1999

• 01:36   Re: [HACKERS] Backend crash in opr_sanity regression test. Bruce Momjian
• 01:41   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Bruce Momjian
• 04:19   Re: [HACKERS] New patches for running PostgreSQL on Windows Bruce Momjian
• 04:27   Re: [HACKERS] New patches for running PostgreSQL on Windows Bruce Momjian
• 10:13   Re: [HACKERS] Backend crash in opr_sanity regression test. Keith Parks
• 10:13   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Keith Parks
• 12:23   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.2 HP-UX makefile problem? Tatsuo Ishii
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] doc/FAQ* files are hosed Tom Lane
• 19:21   Re: [HACKERS] bug in libpgtcl listen Tom Lane
• 19:23   Re: [HACKERS] some patches for 6.4.2 Tom Lane
• 20:11   Re: [HACKERS] drop before create in pg_dump Brook Milligan
• 22:15   Re: EXCEPT/INTERSECT for v6.4 Bruce Momjian

18 January 1999

• 00:08   Postgres Speed or lack thereof John Holland
• 00:29   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Vadim Mikheev
• 01:30   Re: [HACKERS] doc/FAQ* files are hosed Bruce Momjian
• 01:35   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 02:18   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom
• 02:23   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 02:26   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom
• 02:55   Re: [HACKERS] drop before create in pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 02:58   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Vadim Mikheev
• 03:00   Re: [HACKERS] fix pg_dump to dump sequences created by SERIAL datatype Bruce Momjian
• 03:18   Syntax errors in current tree D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 03:30   I need a PostgreSQL vacation Bruce Momjian
• 03:32   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 03:41   Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree Vadim Mikheev
• 04:21   Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree Bruce Momjian
• 04:48   Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree Bruce Momjian
• 05:16   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation Vadim Mikheev
• 06:34   Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/float.c uses non-existent NAN value jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:56   RE: [PATCHES] Another libpq-be patch Magnus Hagander
• 07:09   RE: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Magnus Hagander
• 10:20   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:30   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Hannu Krosing
• 10:30   Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/float.c uses non-existent NAN value Bruce Momjian
• 10:30   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation Bruce Momjian
• 10:38   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Bruce Momjian
• 11:00   Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 11:32   Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree Bruce Momjian
• 11:47   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation The Hermit Hacker
• 12:39   Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/float.c uses non-existent NAN value Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:21   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation Vince Vielhaber
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof John Holland
• 13:34   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Cary O'Brien
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation Bruce Momjian
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation Bruce Momjian
• 13:59   about RULES Jose' Soares
• 14:09   Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree Tom Lane
• 14:38   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 14:40   Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree Bruce Momjian
• 14:48   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 14:48   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Bruce Momjian
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Michael Meskes
• 15:01   latest parser changes Michael Meskes
• 15:01   performance test Michael Meskes
• 15:01   ecpg changes Michael Meskes
• 15:02   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Michael Meskes
• 15:08   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:13   Re: [HACKERS] latest parser changes Bruce Momjian
• 15:16   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg changes Bruce Momjian
• 15:17   KPGsql Bruce Momjian
• 16:35   RE: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Magnus Hagander
• 17:05   Re: [HACKERS] KPGsql The Hermit Hacker
• 17:58   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation The Hermit Hacker
• 18:00   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation Bruce Momjian
• 18:07   pgaccess bug report Bruce Momjian
• 18:07   Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/float.c uses non-existent NAN value Taral
• 18:07   wish path in pgaccess Bruce Momjian
• 18:19   CORBA: row-level locking available? Taral
• 18:29   Re: [HACKERS] CORBA: row-level locking available? The Hermit Hacker
• 19:10   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation J. Michael Roberts
• 19:17   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation Bruce Momjian
• 20:04   Snapshot replication tool Dan Gowin
• 20:35   Re: [HACKERS] about RULES jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:42   Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation The Hermit Hacker
• 20:54   Krivice zapisane v slovenski ustavi anonimno@gov.si
• 21:15   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Hannu Krosing

19 January 1999

• 00:03   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 00:15   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Vadim Mikheev
• 00:27   Prepared statements (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Taral
• 00:32   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Vadim Mikheev
• 00:42   (no subject) Puchong
• 00:56   Re: [HACKERS] latest parser changes Vadim Mikheev
• 01:00   Re: [HACKERS] latest parser changes Bruce Momjian
• 01:28   Re: [HACKERS] performance test Vadim Mikheev
• 03:27   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 03:40   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Vadim Mikheev
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] performance test Bruce Momjian
• 04:03   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Bruce Momjian
• 04:16   Re: [HACKERS] performance test Vadim Mikheev
• 06:14   Good Idea ;-)) Dmitry Samersoff
• 11:08   Error using home-made functions José Paumard
• 11:15   Re: [HACKERS] about RULES Jose' Soares
• 12:19   different results selecting from base tables or views Matthias Schmitt
• 12:36   Re: [HACKERS] different results selecting from base tables or views Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] KPGsql Michael Meskes
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] latest parser changes Michael Meskes
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] latest parser changes Michael Meskes
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Michael Meskes
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] performance test Michael Meskes
• 14:29   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof John Holland
• 14:47   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Roberto Joao Lopes Garcia
• 16:51   Temporary tables Pawel Pierscionek
• 18:46   Re: [HACKERS] KPGsql Bruce Momjian
• 18:46   Re: [HACKERS] latest parser changes Bruce Momjian
• 19:27   Re: [HACKERS] Prepared statements (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Peter T Mount
• 19:50   2 Questions, Solaris 7 & Upgrading to 6.4.2 Chris Williams
• 21:09   pg_dump -c option to drop prior to create Brook Milligan
• 21:31   Re: BSDI 3.1 -> BSDI 4.0 performance degradation;(h Bruce Momjian
• 22:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: BSDI 3.1 -> BSDI 4.0 performance degradation;(h Tatsuo Ishii

20 January 1999

• 00:04   Re: [HACKERS] performance test Vadim Mikheev
• 00:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: BSDI 3.1 -> BSDI 4.0 performance degradation;(h Bruce Momjian
• 00:43   Re: [HACKERS] Time Zones Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:59   Re: [HACKERS] Time Zones Vince Vielhaber
• 03:58   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 04:24   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Bruce Momjian
• 08:51   SPI_prepare() doesn't work well ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:11   How to join PGSQL mailing list? yschen
• 09:31   Re: Beta test of Postgresql 6.5 Bruce Momjian
• 10:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta test of Postgresql 6.5 Vadim Mikheev
• 11:52   Patches D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 13:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta test of Postgresql 6.5 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:12   [Fwd: GNOME-SQL version 0.1] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:47   Re: [HACKERS] Patches Tom Lane
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] SPI_prepare() doesn't work well ? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:43   new date/time patches Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:09   Re: [HACKERS] Patches Bruce Momjian
• 15:09   Re: Beta test of Postgresql 6.5 Bruce Momjian
• 16:52   Re: [HACKERS] KPGsql Michael Meskes
• 16:52   Re: [HACKERS] latest parser changes Michael Meskes
• 17:16   Re: [HACKERS] KPGsql The Hermit Hacker
• 17:22   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta test of Postgresql 6.5 The Hermit Hacker
• 17:48   Re: [HACKERS] latest parser changes Bruce Momjian
• 17:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta test of Postgresql 6.5 Bruce Momjian
• 19:40   Primary key support D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 22:11   RE: [HACKERS] SPI_prepare() doesn't work well ? Hiroshi Inoue

21 January 1999

• 00:10   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta test of Postgresql 6.5 Vadim Mikheev
• 00:35   New CVSup static binaries for Linux glibc2 Thomas Lockhart
• 00:48   gzip vs bzip2 in packing Taral
• 02:00   Re: [HACKERS] gzip vs bzip2 in packing Bruce Momjian
• 03:09   What is MVCC? Cary O'Brien
• 03:55   Re: [HACKERS] gzip vs bzip2 in packing Tom Lane
• 04:06   Re: [HACKERS] gzip vs bzip2 in packing Taral
• 04:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta test of Postgresql 6.5 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 09:21   GROUP BY / ORDER BY string is very slow Oleg Broytmann
• 10:19   Performance test with -F (Was Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Roberto Joao Lopes Garcia
• 11:48   Big files on 32-bit Linux Oleg Broytmann
• 15:08   Importing from Oracle lionel mottay
• 16:37   more patches for ecpg Michael Meskes
• 16:37   ecpg docs Michael Meskes
• 16:44   Adding Xshare to our web site Bruce Momjian
• 16:59   INTERSECT in gram.y again Michael Meskes
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs Bruce Momjian
• 18:08   Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again Bruce Momjian
• 18:08   Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg The Hermit Hacker
• 20:07   Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 20:36   Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg Bruce Momjian
• 20:53   Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump -c option to drop prior to create Bruce Momjian
• 20:55   Re: [HACKERS] SPI_prepare() doesn't work well ? Bruce Momjian

22 January 1999

• 02:37   Re: [HACKERS] SPI_prepare() doesn't work well ? Bruce Momjian
• 03:50   Re: [HACKERS] GROUP BY / ORDER BY string is very slow Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:04   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:08   Re: [HACKERS] Adding Xshare to our web site Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:14   [Fwd: AWL: Re: Another unrecognized SQL clause in MySQL "WHERE CURRENT OF"] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:36   RE: [HACKERS] SPI_prepare() doesn't work well ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:46   New CVSup static binaries for Linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 07:45   Re: What is MVCC? Walter van der Schee
• 08:15   Re: [HACKERS] GROUP BY / ORDER BY string is very slow Oleg Broytmann
• 11:26   getcwd failing suddenly D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 12:24   SET encoding Oleg Broytmann
• 13:00   view? Jose' Soares
• 13:20   Re: [HACKERS] getcwd failing suddenly Tom Lane
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] about RULES Jose' Soares
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] getcwd failing suddenly D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 13:47   Move PostgreSQL 6.4.2 RedHat RPM packages to proper locations Al Dev
• 14:09   Alpha Size (size_t) != int problem Adrian Gartland
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] getcwd failing suddenly Vince Vielhaber
• 14:33   developer's guide? ho9221
• 14:48   Re: [HACKERS] view? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:49   RE: developer's guide? Matthias Schmitt
• 14:57   Re: [HACKERS] Alpha Size (size_t) != int problem Bruce Momjian
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] developer's guide? Bruce Momjian
• 15:05   Re: [HACKERS] view? Constantin Teodorescu
• 16:25   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Todd Graham Lewis
• 16:59   Re: [HACKERS] about RULES jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:09   Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again Michael Meskes
• 17:09   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs Michael Meskes
• 17:09   Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg Michael Meskes
• 17:09   Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg Michael Meskes
• 17:34   Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again Bruce Momjian
• 19:06   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof John Ryan
• 21:34   Re: [HACKERS] getcwd failing suddenly Taral

23 January 1999

• 01:00   MySQL vulnerability Thomas G. Lockhart
• 08:42   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs Michael Meskes
• 10:42   Adding some const keywords to external interfaces D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 14:24   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:47   Primary key update not working D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 16:02   Re: [HACKERS] MySQL vulnerability Tom Lane
• 16:28   Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Tom Lane
• 17:23   Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again Michael Meskes
• 19:29   UNION regress test is failing Tom Lane
• 19:31   Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again Bruce Momjian
• 19:35   Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Bruce Momjian
• 19:36   Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Bruce Momjian

24 January 1999

• 01:42   Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 02:33   Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Bruce Momjian
• 03:33   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Vadim Mikheev
• 04:08   cvsup RPMs available Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:13   [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 06:26   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs Michael Meskes
• 12:22   Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 15:54   Q about heap_getattr Tom Lane
• 16:09   Re: [HACKERS] Q about heap_getattr Vadim Mikheev
• 16:21   Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Tom Lane
• 16:32   Re: [HACKERS] Q about heap_getattr Tom Lane
• 16:42   Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code Tom Lane
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] Q about heap_getattr Bruce Momjian
• 17:56   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 18:06   Re: [HACKERS] Q about heap_getattr Tom Lane
• 18:37   Foreign key parsing and inherited classes Oliver Elphick
• 19:00   Re: [HACKERS] Q about heap_getattr Bruce Momjian
• 20:10   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Goran Thyni
• 20:28   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof The Hermit Hacker
• 21:00   alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Goran Thyni
• 21:37   Odd behavior of type coercion for datetime Tom Lane
• 23:06   Another speedup idea (two, even) Tom Lane

25 January 1999

• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] Another speedup idea (two, even) Bruce Momjian
• 00:33   Re: Odd behavior of type coercion for datetime Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:05   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Vadim Mikheev
• 02:02   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Vince Vielhaber
• 03:39   Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) The Hermit Hacker
• 04:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Bruce Momjian
• 04:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Tom Lane
• 05:25   Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code Todd Graham Lewis
• 05:28   Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again Michael Meskes
• 07:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Oleg Broytmann
• 08:27   Problem with 6.5 and tables >2Gb Peter T Mount
• 09:01   postgres (zombie) Constantin Teodorescu
• 13:06   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Cary O'Brien
• 13:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Bruce Momjian
• 13:25   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 13:27   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Vadim Mikheev
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] postgres (zombie) Tom Lane
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Oleg Broytmann
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Bruce Momjian
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Oleg Broytmann
• 14:18   Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Oleg Broytmann
• 14:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:55   FW: [CORE] create database bug Dan Gowin
• 16:27   Re: [HACKERS] FW: [CORE] create database bug jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:29   Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code The Hermit Hacker
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Bruce Momjian
• 16:43   RE: [HACKERS] FW: [CORE] create database bug Dan Gowin
• 17:48   handling 64bit time_t's Adrian Gartland
• 21:45   Re: [HACKERS] FW: [CORE] create database bug Tom Lane
• 22:38   help bug and comment char. Terry Mackintosh

26 January 1999

• 01:10   Re: [HACKERS] handling 64bit time_t's Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:20   Re: [HACKERS] help bug and comment char. Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:56   Major breakage? Tom Lane
• 11:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Oleg Broytmann
• 11:06   Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Vadim Mikheev
• 11:45   Primary keys additional D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 12:14   Re: [HACKERS] Primary keys additional D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 13:54   Re: Non-blocking queries in postgresql Bruce Momjian
• 15:49   Re: [HACKERS] MySQL vulnerability Goran Thyni
• 15:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Goran Thyni
• 15:49   Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Goran Thyni
• 16:09   Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) The Hermit Hacker
• 16:57   dump doesn't save views and blobs lorenzo@argon.roma2.infn.it
• 17:05   Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Tom Lane
• 17:45   Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Tom Lane
• 20:06   Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Bruce Momjian
• 21:37   Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Goran Thyni
• 21:47   Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) The Hermit Hacker
• 22:59   mb support fix Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:18   Re: [PATCHES] mb support fix The Hermit Hacker

27 January 1999

• 00:24   Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Vadim Mikheev
• 05:23   MB big5 support patch (current) Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:51   Problem with multiple SUMs D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 12:30   Re: Non-blocking queries in postgresql Bruce Momjian
• 12:30   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Bruce Momjian
• 13:32   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Tom Lane
• 14:00   regression test HAVING fixed Bruce Momjian
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Bruce Momjian
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Non-blocking queries in postgresql Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Bruce Momjian
• 15:00   TEMP tables Bruce Momjian
• 15:02   PL/pgSQL and SPI jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:10   Re: [HACKERS] TEMP tables Vadim Mikheev
• 15:43   Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Vadim Mikheev
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] TEMP tables Bruce Momjian
• 16:36   Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed Tom Lane
• 16:44   Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Vadim Mikheev
• 16:53   Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed Vadim Mikheev
• 18:19   Something wacko about EXPLAIN cost stats Tom Lane
• 19:27   Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Vadim Mikheev
• 19:45   Re: [HACKERS] Another speedup idea (two, even) Tom Lane
• 20:32   Re: [HACKERS] Another speedup idea (two, even) Bruce Momjian
• 21:45   NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Vince Vielhaber
• 22:19   Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 The Hermit Hacker
• 23:34   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 23:48   Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Vince Vielhaber

28 January 1999

• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Bruce Momjian
• 00:43   Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Vince Vielhaber
• 04:44   FOR UPDATE question Michael Meskes
• 04:44   Another small ecpg bug fixed Michael Meskes
• 06:22   Re: [HACKERS] FOR UPDATE question Vadim Mikheev
• 07:47   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 07:50   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 07:51   a test Marc G. Fournier
• 07:51   Test two... The Hermit Hacker
• 07:52   Tsest .. The Hermit Hacker
• 07:54   Death! The Hermit Hacker
• 08:06   Testing... Marc G. Fournier
• 08:12   Re: [HACKERS] Death! Oleg Broytmann
• 09:05   new heap manager mmalloc Ulrich Voss
• 09:54   PL/pgSQL mixed case support jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:24   Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:41   Re: [HACKERS] Death! The Hermit Hacker
• 10:41   Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc The Hermit Hacker
• 11:28   Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Oliver Elphick
• 12:12   Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Vadim Mikheev
• 12:15   Re: [HACKERS] Death! Oleg Broytmann
• 12:20   (Fwd) Re: [ADMIN] Running Postgres on a HP-Ux 10.10 System Reiner Nippes
• 12:30   Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Massimo Dal Zotto
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Oliver Elphick
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Tom Lane
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Tom Lane
• 14:27   RE: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Jackson, DeJuan
• 15:23   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 16:00   Using PostgreSQL in spite of ASE silvio_paiva@uol.com.br
• 16:02   Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Bruce Momjian
• 16:44   Theory and practice of free software Tom Lane
• 17:03   Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Tom Lane
• 17:42   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 17:45   RE: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Jackson, DeJuan
• 17:50   Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Tom Lane
• 18:06   Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Tom Lane
• 19:39   TEMP table code Bruce Momjian
• 19:46   tough locale bug Goran Thyni
• 19:48   [Fwd: DBD::Pg::db do failed: pqReadData() Error] Edmund Mergl
• 19:48   tough locale bug Goran Thyni
• 21:19   Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian
• 21:40   Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Patrick Verdon
• 21:51   Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Patrick Verdon
• 23:10   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:32   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) The Hermit Hacker

29 January 1999

• 01:06   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Vadim Mikheev
• 04:18   Re: [HACKERS] TEMP table code Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Oleg Bartunov
• 05:00   Re: [HACKERS] TEMP table code Bruce Momjian
• 05:07   equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Vadim Mikheev
• 06:38   AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 12:02   Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:15   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:05   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Patrick Verdon
• 14:13   VACUUM ANALYZE failed on linux Oleg Broytmann
• 14:21   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane
• 15:03   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Hannu Krosing
• 15:04   Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON ... ORDER BY ... Tom Lane
• 15:20   Re: postgres v6.0 and pgsql-docs-digest V1 #401 Hannu Krosing
• 15:55   READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev
• 16:13   another ecpg patch Michael Meskes
• 16:15   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tom Lane
• 16:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON ... ORDER BY ... Oliver Elphick
• 18:18   License for PostgreSQL Contributions (Was: RE: DOM Implementation for C++) Clark Evans
• 19:05   Visionary Dan Gowin
• 20:05   Problems with anon CVS? Keith Parks
• 20:09   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:03   RE: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:22   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tatsuo Ishii

30 January 1999

• 00:09   Re: [GENERAL] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger
• 02:05   Re: [GENERAL] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger
• 02:20   Re: [GENERAL] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger
• 02:40   Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev
• 03:30   Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Bruce Momjian
• 03:30   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian
• 04:27   RE: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Bruce Momjian
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] Visionary Bruce Momjian
• 04:32   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Bruce Momjian
• 05:55   Re: Visionary Michael Robinson
• 06:06   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) The Hermit Hacker
• 06:08   Re: Visionary Michael Robinson
• 08:37   Re: [HACKERS] Problems with anon CVS? Dr. Ernst Molitor
• 09:07   Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev
• 09:12   Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev
• 09:42   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Hannu Krosing
• 09:45   Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Hannu Krosing
• 10:41   ERROR: heap_fetch: xinv19073 relation: ReadBuffer(81aeefe) failed Ian Grant
• 10:49   ERROR: heap_fetch: xinv19073 relation: ReadBuffer(81aeefe) failed Ian Grant
• 11:01   ERROR: heap_fetch: xinv19201 relation: ReadBuffer(81aeefe) failed Ian Grant
• 12:09   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes Cary O'Brien
• 13:08   Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Patrick Welche
• 18:19   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tom Lane
• 18:37   Re: [DOCS] Re: postgres v6.0 and pgsql-docs-digest V1 #401 The Hermit Hacker
• 19:08   Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Tom Lane
• 22:12   Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane
• 22:43   Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane
• 23:11   Backends and semaphores Cary O'Brien
• 23:31   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) The Hermit Hacker

31 January 1999

• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Bruce Momjian
• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Bruce Momjian
• 00:35   Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger
• 01:27   Re: vacuumdb? D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 01:31   Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Bruce Momjian
• 01:42   Patches D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 03:38   Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] Patches Bruce Momjian
• 05:00   Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Bruce Momjian
• 07:22   Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:20   Re: [HACKERS] Patches D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 13:55   Patch (was: tough locale bug) Goran Thyni
• 15:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuumdb? Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: [HACKERS] Patches Tom Lane
• 16:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: [HACKERS] Patches Bruce Momjian
• 16:59   Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Tom Lane
• 17:36   Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Bruce Momjian
• 18:23   Re: Problems with anon CVS? The Hermit Hacker
• 19:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Oliver Elphick
• 21:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane
• 22:06   Table exists, but not accessible? Thomas Reinke