Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.05.9901241826400.5725-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof  (Goran Thyni <goran@kirra.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
BUGS    The alloca() function is machine dependent; its use is discouraged.


On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Goran Thyni wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I don't think we can or should stop using malloc(), but we can
> > ask it for large blocks and do our own allocations inside those
> > blocks --- was that what you meant?
> 
> I will just jump in with a small idea.
> The Gnome crowd is investigating using alloca instead of malloc/free
> where applicable. It is a huge save in CPU cycles where it can be used.
> 
>     regards,
> -- 
> -----------------
> G�ran Thyni
> This is Penguin Country. On a quiet night you can hear Windows NT
> reboot!
> 

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Goran Thyni
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Next
From: Goran Thyni
Date:
Subject: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof)