Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 December 1998

• 00:50   Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding... Vadim Mikheev
• 00:52   Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT Vadim Mikheev
• 03:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] cursor and update + view Vadim Mikheev
• 04:06   Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT Tom Lane
• 14:26   Re: [HACKERS] Testing, Hello? Tom Lane
• 14:43   NT port Peter T Mount
• 16:08   Re: [HACKERS] Testing, Hello? Henry B. Hotz
• 17:20   Indexing Implementation Loan B. Pham
• 19:04   Re: [HACKERS] NT port The Hermit Hacker
• 21:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Mysql 321 - Mysql 322 - msql Bruce Momjian
• 21:29   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.x Bruce Momjian
• 22:13   Bug in 6.4 query of table in varchar.c Marcus Mascari
• 23:09   Re: [HACKERS] New platform-specific FAQ for HPUX Bruce Momjian
• 23:21   Re: [HACKERS] DROPping tables with SERIALs Bruce Momjian
• 23:25   Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding... Bruce Momjian
• 23:27   Re: PL/pgSQL on BSDI-3.1 Bruce Momjian
• 23:29   Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding... Bruce Momjian
• 23:39   Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding... Bruce Momjian

2 December 1998

• 02:19   Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion Vadim Mikheev
• 02:54   Re: [HACKERS] New platform-specific FAQ for HPUX The Hermit Hacker
• 03:49   New Linux/libc5 CVSup client Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:04   Re: [HACKERS] NT port Peter T Mount
• 05:52   RE: [HACKERS] NT port Horak Daniel
• 07:42   Re: [HACKERS] DROPping tables with SERIALs Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 08:39   RE: [HACKERS] NT port Horak Daniel
• 09:30   weird state after aborted transaction in pgsql 6.4 David Sauer
• 10:47   Re: [HACKERS] weird state after aborted transaction in pgsql 6.4 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:59   Re: [HACKERS] weird state after aborted transaction in pgsql 6.4 Hannu Krosing
• 13:40   Re: [HACKERS] NT port Bruce Momjian
• 14:13   Re: [HACKERS] NT port Oleg Bartunov
• 15:03   RE: New Linux/libc5 CVSup client John Polstra
• 15:06   Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:00   NT port Joost Kraaijeveld
• 23:01   Re: New Linux/libc5 CVSup client Thomas G. Lockhart
• 23:35   Re: [HACKERS] Questions on using multi-byte character in a field of a table (BIG5) Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:56   Bug report: PL/pgSQL and mixed case table/field names. Billy G. Allie

3 December 1998

• 00:24   Re: New Linux/libc5 CVSup client John Polstra
• 02:56   Problem w/ psql crashing aaron ross
• 16:33   Two ugly bugs in pg_dump :-( Constantin Teodorescu
• 16:37   Need immediate help with install Chris Williams
• 16:52   =ANY bug Sferacarta Software
• 16:52   IN bug Sferacarta Software
• 16:53   BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE Sferacarta Software
• 16:55   Two pg_dump ugly bugs :-( Constantin Teodorescu
• 16:56   gram.y Sferacarta Software
• 16:57   Projecting attributes of function return values Hiroshi Inoue
• 17:00   Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 17:47   RE: [HACKERS] DROPping tables with SERIALs Jackson, DeJuan
• 18:20   AW: [HACKERS] DROPping tables with SERIALs Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 22:21   Re: [HACKERS] Two pg_dump ugly bugs :-( Tom Lane
• 23:48   [Question!] PL/pgSQL Error..??? Ki won, Song

4 December 1998

• 00:53   Re: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE Vadim Mikheev
• 04:45   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:59   Case statement ready? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:11   Re: [HACKERS] Case statement ready? Vadim Mikheev
• 11:42   Re[2]: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE Sferacarta Software
• 13:44   Re: [HACKERS] Case statement ready? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 14:40   exp() changes Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:57   Re: [HACKERS] Case statement ready? Bruce Momjian
• 15:19   Re: [HACKERS] exp() changes Bruce Momjian
• 17:36   Re: [HACKERS] Case statement ready? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

5 December 1998

• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] Case statement ready? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:03   Re: [HACKERS] Case statement ready? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:54   Sorry to nag, but... [Failures with arrays] Oliver Elphick
• 06:56   Nag: postgresql/c.h typedefs Size as 'unsigned int' on Alpha Oliver Elphick
• 09:33   Re: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE Vadim Mikheev
• 10:20   Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion Vadim Mikheev
• 11:16   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Michael Meskes
• 11:44   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 14:42   Locale fix Oleg Broytmann
• 16:46   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump - segfault with -z option Constantin Teodorescu
• 17:57   Parser bug (?) Oliver Elphick
• 20:31   Re: [HACKERS] Patch for pg_dump (6.4) inheritance bug Tom Lane
• 22:28   Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?) Tom Lane

6 December 1998

• 01:55   Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:47   Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?) Tom Lane
• 04:47   Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:06   Re: [HACKERS] gram.y Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:59   Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?) Tom Lane
• 14:26   Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?)t Bruce Momjian
• 18:43   Re: [INTERFACES] crypt not included when compiling libpgtcl !!!!!!! Eric Lee Green
• 19:06   Re: [INTERFACES] crypt not included when compiling libpgtcl !!!!!!! Tom Lane
• 21:36   Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?)t Thomas G. Lockhart
• 21:39   Re: [INTERFACES] crypt not included when compiling libpgtcl !!!!!!! Thomas G. Lockhart
• 22:36   Re: [INTERFACES] crypt not included when compiling libpgtcl !!!!!!! Bryan White

7 December 1998

• 11:45   ... Cd Chen
• 11:56   Re: [INTERFACES] crypt not included when compiling libpgtcl !!!!!!! Tom Lane
• 11:57   Re: [INTERFACES] crypt not included when compiling libpgtcl !!!!!!! Eric Lee Green
• 11:57   Re: [INTERFACES] crypt not included when compiling libpgtcl !!!!!!! Eric Lee Green
• 12:36   memory leak? Eildert Groeneveld
• 13:12   Re: [HACKERS] Case statement ready? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:27   PgAccess stable version 0.92 released ! Constantin Teodorescu
• 13:32   Compiling Postgres for Windows NT Joost Kraaijeveld
• 14:34   Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' The Hermit Hacker
• 15:32   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' Bruce Momjian
• 15:42   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 17:23   Bytea(precision) David Hartwig
• 17:36   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' The Hermit Hacker
• 17:52   Cursor Movement - Past the End David Hartwig
• 23:27   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' Tom Lane
• 23:33   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 23:38   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' Tom Lane

8 December 1998

• 02:19   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 02:30   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' The Hermit Hacker
• 04:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: bug on aggregate function AVG() Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:49   Re: libpgtcl.dll for Windows Constantin Teodorescu
• 06:45   memory destruction in 6.4 Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:01   Problems Peter T Mount
• 07:34   Re: [HACKERS] memory destruction in 6.4 Constantin Teodorescu
• 07:45   Re: [HACKERS] memory destruction in 6.4 Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:00   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 12:22   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:00   problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Oleg Bartunov
• 13:00   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: libpgtcl.dll for Windows Tom Lane
• 13:25   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:41   RE: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Joost Kraaijeveld
• 15:39   Participate in "Freedom 64-bit CPU" project (PostgreSQL CPU!!) Dev_Al
• 16:57   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: libpgtcl.dll for Windows Constantin Teodorescu
• 17:06   unsubscribe ocie@paracel.com
• 17:14   FW: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Re: libpgtcl.dll for Windows Dan Gowin
• 18:04   Question about postmaster processes Chris Williams
• 18:20   Re: [HACKERS] Question about postmaster processes Bruce Momjian
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' Brook Milligan
• 18:55   Re: [HACKERS] Question about postmaster processes Hakan Kalyoncu
• 22:56   isnull() or is it? Vince Vielhaber

9 December 1998

• 02:07   Re: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 02:07   Re: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Bruce Momjian
• 03:04   Re: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:11   OID min/max functions Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:53   Bugs in parse_func.c ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Bruce Momjian
• 05:42   plTcl test failed Constantin Teodorescu
• 06:06   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' Henry B. Hotz
• 08:28   AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 10:03   Re: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t H.Lefebvre
• 11:41   Error with table that exists but postgres says it doesn't Chris Williams
• 11:58   AW: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 12:09   Re[2]: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE Sferacarta Software
• 12:12   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Oleg Bartunov
• 13:17   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 13:22   Re: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:27   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:29   FW: [HACKERS] plTcl test failed Dan Gowin
• 13:32   Re: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Bruce Momjian
• 13:32   Re: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Bruce Momjian
• 13:32   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Bruce Momjian
• 13:33   Re: [HACKERS] plTcl test failed Bruce Momjian
• 13:47   Re: [HACKERS] plTcl test failed Constantin Teodorescu
• 13:48   Re: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Bruce Momjian
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Bruce Momjian
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Vince Vielhaber
• 14:22   Re: [HACKERS] plTcl test failed Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] plTcl test failed Constantin Teodorescu
• 14:47   Re: [HACKERS] plTcl test failed Tom Lane
• 15:07   Trouble with compile of 6.4 under UW7 Jim Nicholson
• 15:38   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:17   Re: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:25   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:34   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 16:49   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Oleg Bartunov

10 December 1998

• 00:55   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 The Hermit Hacker
• 02:29   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Bruce Momjian
• 03:46   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 The Hermit Hacker
• 06:36   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 06:57   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 11:32   Re[2]: [HACKERS] gram.y Sferacarta Software
• 13:08   Re[2]: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Sferacarta Software
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: MIN(text)/MAX(text) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:45   Re: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:40   Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements The Hermit Hacker
• 16:59   PgAccess version 0.93 (for Unix and Windows) has been released! Constantin Teodorescu
• 17:16   6.4.1 release Bruce Momjian
• 18:10   subscribe Frank Ridderbusch
• 18:13   Re: Re[2]: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:41   RE: [HACKERS] PgAccess version 0.93 (for Unix and Windows) has be en released! Dan Gowin

11 December 1998

• 00:20   libpq and libpgtcl in Windows Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:43   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Tom Lane
• 00:58   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:33   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Bruce Momjian
• 04:19   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release The Hermit Hacker
• 04:35   JOIN syntax. Examples? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:52   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? The Hermit Hacker
• 05:05   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Bruce Momjian
• 07:26   AW: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 09:04   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Hannu Krosing
• 11:53   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:07   RE: [HACKERS] libpq and libpgtcl in Windows Dan Gowin
• 12:09   alter table bug??? Terry Mackintosh
• 12:25   RE: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Maarten Boekhold
• 12:26   Inclusion of spi mod. date. function? Terry Mackintosh
• 12:54   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:56   Re: [PATCHES] [REL6_4] pg_dumpall & binary cursor fix in MB support Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:12   PostgreODBC error Dan Gowin
• 13:16   RE: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Dan Gowin
• 13:20   follow up to: alter table bug??? Terry Mackintosh
• 13:28   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:53   Bad libraries again in latest snapshot , libpgtcl and pltcl Constantin Teodorescu
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Hannu Krosing
• 14:22   Re: [HACKERS] alter table bug??? Bruce Momjian
• 14:27   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Bruce Momjian
• 14:39   Re: [HACKERS] psql \d command Bruce Momjian
• 14:51   Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again Bruce Momjian
• 14:52   Re: [HACKERS] lock table Bruce Momjian
• 14:53   For the TODO list Constantin Teodorescu
• 15:03   Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: [HACKERS] For the TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 16:02   Error in man page Terry Mackintosh
• 16:09   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Michael Meskes
• 16:25   RE: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Jackson, DeJuan
• 20:11   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 20:35   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Oliver Elphick
• 21:40   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Matthew N. Dodd

12 December 1998

• 01:56   Re: [HACKERS] Warning!! Bruce Momjian
• 01:57   Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - duplicate entries in announce Bruce Momjian
• 02:05   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:46   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Pascal André
• 15:32   Re: [HACKERS] Warning!! Tom Lane
• 17:58   Re: [PATCHES] Patch for PostgreSQL 6.4-BETA5: pgsql/src/backend/port/getrusage.c Bruce Momjian
• 18:03   Re: [HACKERS] Warning!! Bruce Momjian
• 18:09   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release The Hermit Hacker
• 18:21   Re: New SPI contrib stuff, was Re: [HACKERS] SPI hacking Bruce Momjian
• 18:35   Re: [HACKERS] distinct + order by Bruce Momjian
• 18:57   Re: OK now :-) was Re: [HACKERS] regression tests Bruce Momjian
• 19:03   Re: Overruns (was: 'pgsql/src/backend/lib stringinfo.c') Bruce Momjian
• 20:09   Re: [HACKERS] memory leak with Abort Transaction Bruce Momjian
• 20:40   Re: [HACKERS] shmem limits and redolog Bruce Momjian
• 20:52   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 contrib/spi/ Bruce Momjian
• 21:48   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 contrib/spi/ Terry Mackintosh
• 22:38   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 contrib/spi/ Bruce Momjian
• 22:42   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Tatsuo Ishii

13 December 1998

• 00:24   Re: Postgres for Sunos 4.1.4 Bruce Momjian
• 00:30   Re: [HACKERS] Concurrency control questions 6.3.2 vs. 6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 01:37   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 schedule SUNOS4.1.X build Bruce Momjian
• 01:43   Re: [HACKERS] postgresql/c.h typedefs Size as 'unsigned int' (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 01:45   Re: [HACKERS] Re: memory leak with Abort Transaction Bruce Momjian
• 01:49   Re: [HACKERS] DROPping tables with SERIALs Bruce Momjian
• 01:55   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg man page Bruce Momjian
• 01:58   Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT Bruce Momjian
• 02:07   Re: [HACKERS] weird state after aborted transaction in pgsql 6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 02:09   Re: [HACKERS] Bug report: PL/pgSQL and mixed case table/field names. Bruce Momjian
• 02:19   Re: [HACKERS] Projecting attributes of function return values Bruce Momjian
• 02:20   Re: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE Bruce Momjian
• 02:21   Re: [HACKERS] =ANY bug Bruce Momjian
• 02:25   Re: [HACKERS] Sorry to nag, but... [Failures with arrays] Bruce Momjian
• 02:26   Re: [HACKERS] Nag: postgresql/c.h typedefs Size as 'unsigned int' on Alpha Bruce Momjian
• 02:28   Re: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE Bruce Momjian
• 02:28   Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion Bruce Momjian
• 02:30   Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?) Bruce Momjian
• 02:32   Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?) Bruce Momjian
• 02:34   Re: [HACKERS] Cursor Movement - Past the End Bruce Momjian
• 02:38   Re: [HACKERS] memory destruction in 6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 02:42   Re: [HACKERS] memory destruction in 6.4u Bruce Momjian
• 02:45   Re: [HACKERS] PgAccess version 0.93 (for Unix and Windows) has been released! Bruce Momjian
• 02:45   Re: [GENERAL] Announce: PyGreSQL 2.2 Bruce Momjian
• 03:11   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg man page Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:12   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Bruce Momjian
• 03:14   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Bruce Momjian
• 03:16   Re: For the TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 03:18   Re: [HACKERS] Error in man page Bruce Momjian
• 07:35   Re: [HACKERS] Two pg_dump ugly bugs :-( Constantin Teodorescu
• 08:04   Re: [HACKERS] postgresql/c.h typedefs Size as 'unsigned int' (fwd) Oliver Elphick
• 09:19   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:54   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg man page Thomas Good
• 10:58   Re: [GENERAL] Announce: PyGreSQL 2.2 D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 11:26   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg man page Thomas G. Lockhart
• 11:32   Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] memory destruction in 6.4 Tatsuo Ishii
• 15:25   Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT Tom Lane
• 17:34   Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT Bruce Momjian
• 18:16   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Tom Lane
• 19:04   Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion The Hermit Hacker
• 19:07   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 19:46   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Tom Lane
• 20:03   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 21:58   Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion Bruce Momjian
• 22:29   Re: [HACKERS] Case statement ready! Thomas G. Lockhart
• 22:32   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 22:42   Re: [HACKERS] Bad libraries again in latest snapshot , libpgtcl and pltcl Tom Lane
• 22:48   RE: [HACKERS] libpq and libpgtcl in Windows Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:57   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Tom Lane
• 23:33   vnsprintf() The Hermit Hacker
• 23:55   Re: [HACKERS] vnsprintf() Tom Lane
• 23:57   Re: [HACKERS] vnsprintf() The Hermit Hacker

14 December 1998

• 00:40   Can't 'or' things? Terry Mackintosh
• 01:31   catalog/heap.c... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:42   palloc() vs static define? The Hermit Hacker
• 01:49   Please check: commands/dbcommands.c The Hermit Hacker
• 01:54   Please check...ignore them... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:58   Re: [HACKERS] Can't 'or' things? Bruce Momjian
• 02:01   Re: [HACKERS] palloc() vs static define? Bruce Momjian
• 02:02   Re: [HACKERS] Please check: commands/dbcommands.c Bruce Momjian
• 02:03   Reason for commands/user.c? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:04   Re: [HACKERS] Please check...ignore them... Bruce Momjian
• 02:06   Alot of code...NOT_USED... The Hermit Hacker
• 02:15   sprintf() of char* value, no memory allocation? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:25   Re: [HACKERS] sprintf() of char* value, no memory allocation? Bruce Momjian
• 02:27   Re: [HACKERS] Alot of code...NOT_USED... Bruce Momjian
• 02:27   Re: [HACKERS] Reason for commands/user.c? Bruce Momjian
• 02:28   Re: [HACKERS] catalog/heap.c... Bruce Momjian
• 02:37   Re: [HACKERS] Reason for commands/user.c? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:47   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 contrib/spi/ Terry Mackintosh
• 02:49   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Anthony Heading
• 03:13   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 contrib/spi/ Bruce Momjian
• 03:15   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Bruce Momjian
• 03:26   Re: [HACKERS] catalog/heap.c... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:35   Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:21   Does this make sense: The Hermit Hacker
• 04:23   Re: [HACKERS] catalog/heap.c... The Hermit Hacker
• 04:25   Re: [HACKERS] catalog/heap.c... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:19   Re: [HACKERS] catalog/heap.c... The Hermit Hacker
• 05:30   Re: [HACKERS] Does this make sense: Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:39   Re: [INTERFACES] RE: [HACKERS] libpq and libpgtcl in Windows Constantin Teodorescu
• 06:07   nabstime.c changes... The Hermit Hacker
• 07:17   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:25   Re: [HACKERS] Bug report: PL/pgSQL and mixed case table/field names. jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:34   Re: [HACKERS] Projecting attributes of function return values jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:48   Backend crash in opr_sanity regression test. Keith Parks
• 08:10   The problem between libpq and libpgtcl for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue
• 11:46   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 11:50   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 12:40   Re[2]: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE Sferacarta Software
• 12:53   Re: [HACKERS] nabstime.c changes... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] Does this make sense: Bruce Momjian
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] Bug report: PL/pgSQL and mixed case table/field names. Bruce Momjian
• 13:10   Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE Bruce Momjian
• 16:47   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 release Hannu Krosing
• 16:50   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg man page Michael Meskes
• 16:52   Re: [HACKERS] palloc() vs static define? Tom Lane
• 16:52   Re: [HACKERS] Does this make sense: Bruce Momjian
• 16:59   Re: [HACKERS] Does this make sense: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] Does this make sense: geek+@cmu.edu
• 17:13   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Hannu Krosing
• 21:48   RE: [HACKERS] Projecting attributes of function return values Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:50   RE: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Jackson, DeJuan
• 23:01   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 23:18   Re: [HACKERS] Backend crash in opr_sanity regression test. Tom Lane
• 23:20   Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Thomas G. Lockhart

15 December 1998

• 00:16   Re: [HACKERS] Backend crash in opr_sanity regression test. Vadim Mikheev
• 10:40   123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Sferacarta Software
• 11:16   Re: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Oleg Broytmann
• 11:42   Re[2]: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples? Sferacarta Software
• 12:30   Re: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Bruce Momjian
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Vince Vielhaber
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 David Hartwig
• 14:01   Re[2]: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Sferacarta Software
• 14:20   Re: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Bruce Momjian
• 14:30   RE: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Jackson, DeJuan
• 14:44   Re: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Tom Lane
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Bruce Momjian
• 17:55   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt nabstime.c' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 18:05   [Fwd: SGVLLUG DOWNLOAD: Beta of IBM DB2 5.2 for Linux] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 18:07   Re: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:32   [Fwd: catalog files] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 18:40   RE: [Fwd: catalog files] Vince Vielhaber
• 20:42   Re: [HACKERS] RE: [Fwd: catalog files] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 21:31   Re: [HACKERS] RE: [Fwd: catalog files] Vince Vielhaber
• 21:37   ... Clark Evans
• 22:21   Re: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Tom Lane
• 22:30   Re: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Bruce Momjian
• 23:40   Old parser feature Thomas G. Lockhart
• 23:46   Re: [HACKERS] Old parser feature Bruce Momjian

16 December 1998

• 03:19   Re: [HACKERS] 123.45 - 123 = 0.45 Theo Kramer
• 09:01   CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Vadim Mikheev
• 14:52   Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/storage/ipc shmem.c' Bruce Momjian
• 15:02   Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion Vadim Mikheev
• 15:02   MVCC works in serialized mode! Vadim Mikheev
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Bruce Momjian
• 17:58   Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:21   Have any ideas to support GNU gettext package ?? Cd Chen
• 20:51   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Keith Parks

17 December 1998

• 01:01   alter table drop/alter column? Roland Roberts
• 01:44   Re: [HACKERS] Have any ideas to support GNU gettext package ?? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 02:01   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Vadim Mikheev
• 04:16   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Vadim Mikheev
• 06:03   Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion Vadim Mikheev
• 08:15   Re: Have any ideas to support GNU gettext package ?? Karl Eichwalder
• 09:56   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Keith Parks
• 11:10   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... The Hermit Hacker
• 13:12   HELP restarting postmaster Anne Rose
• 13:46   Re: [PATCHES] Cobalt/Linux porting patch Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:12   Bug fix for src/backend/ports/snprintf.c sent to the patches list Pedro J. Lobo
• 14:49   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 15:32   CVS log for a specific tag Bruce Momjian
• 16:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Cobalt/Linux porting patch The Hermit Hacker
• 16:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Cobalt/Linux porting patch Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Cobalt/Linux porting patch The Hermit Hacker
• 20:04   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Keith Parks
• 20:35   Re: [HACKERS] CVS log for a specific tag jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:55   RE: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:17   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Keith Parks

18 December 1998

• 01:08   Re: [HACKERS] CVS log for a specific tag Bruce Momjian
• 03:37   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:38   Upgrades for 6.4.1 Bruce Momjian
• 03:44   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Vadim Mikheev
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Vadim Mikheev
• 04:59   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Bruce Momjian
• 05:08   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:33   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Bruce Momjian
• 06:19   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:52   Re: [GENERAL] date_part bug? Oleg Broytmann
• 07:48   Re: [GENERAL] date_part bug? Oliver Elphick
• 09:35   Total Multimedia Board & CPU deal PCblazer
• 12:57   Fixed outfuncs jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT: crash in select_view regression test... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:18   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] date_part bug? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:05   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Hannu Krosing
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Bruce Momjian
• 15:40   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Brook Milligan
• 15:54   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Bruce Momjian
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Bruce Momjian
• 16:04   Re: [HACKERS] Sorry to nag, but... [Failures with arrays] Bruce Momjian
• 16:08   Re: [GENERAL] Announce: PyGreSQL 2.2 Bruce Momjian
• 16:41   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Constantin Teodorescu
• 16:41   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:54   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Bruce Momjian
• 17:56   6.4.1 fails to compile Bruce Momjian
• 22:44   Help with Documentation? Clark Evans
• 22:51   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:25   Re: [HACKERS] Fixed outfuncs Keith Parks
• 23:39   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Bruce Momjian

19 December 1998

• 00:32   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Billy G. Allie
• 00:34   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Bruce Momjian
• 00:52   Re: [HACKERS] Help with Documentation? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:59   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:04   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 fails to compile Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:24   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 fails to compile Thomas G. Lockhart
• 02:13   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 fails to compile The Hermit Hacker
• 02:30   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 fails to compile Thomas G. Lockhart
• 02:34   CVS Web? Clark Evans
• 03:29   Re: [HACKERS] CVS Web? The Hermit Hacker
• 08:12   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Oleg Bartunov
• 09:49   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Vadim Mikheev
• 09:51   BUGS list Trever Adams
• 15:44   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Tom Lane
• 16:13   Is this a bug? or am I doing some thing wrong? Terry Mackintosh
• 21:39   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Bruce Momjian

20 December 1998

• 01:41   RE: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Stupor Genius
• 02:46   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 Clark Evans
• 02:51   SELECT DISTINCT i FROM dtest ORDER BY j Clark Evans
• 15:54   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT DISTINCT i FROM dtest ORDER BY j Tom Lane
• 17:05   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT DISTINCT i FROM dtest ORDER BY j Bruce Momjian

21 December 1998

• 08:26   PostgreSQL 6.4 like bug(?) Oleg Broytmann
• 08:31   Re: [HACKERS] Is this a bug? or am I doing some thing wrong? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:56   Re: [HACKERS] Upgrades for 6.4.1 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:11   Python interface D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 14:40   PostgreSQL 6.4 like bug(?) Oleg Broytmann
• 15:45   v6.4.1 - to be released... The Hermit Hacker

22 December 1998

• 04:33   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.4 like bug(?) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:21   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.4 like bug(?) Oleg Broytmann
• 06:46   Problems on NUMERIC jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:59   Re: [HACKERS] Problems on NUMERIC Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:16   Re: [HACKERS] Problems on NUMERIC Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Problems on NUMERIC jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] Problems on NUMERIC Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] Problems on NUMERIC jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:21   ecpg patches Michael Meskes
• 16:51   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg patches The Hermit Hacker
• 22:06   (stupid) bug in agg_select_candidate David Sauer
• 23:54   Re: [HACKERS] Problems on NUMERIC Thomas G. Lockhart

23 December 1998

• 05:00   Re: [HACKERS] (stupid) bug in agg_select_candidate Thomas G. Lockhart
• 10:36   Re: [HACKERS] (stupid) bug in agg_select_candidate David Sauer
• 11:26   bug(?) if int8 as primary key David Sauer
• 12:17   Re: [HACKERS] bug(?) if int8 as primary key Oleg Bartunov
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] bug(?) if int8 as primary key Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:34   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Oleg Broytmann
• 14:15   Mhonarc for the docs list Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:22   Re: [HACKERS] Mhonarc for the docs list Oleg Broytmann
• 14:30   RE: [HACKERS] Mhonarc for the docs list Vince Vielhaber
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:40   Re: [HACKERS] Mhonarc for the docs list Hal Snyder
• 23:16   PG_SUBVERSION SHIOZAKI Takehiko
• 23:42   6.4.1 HISTORY etc. Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:59   Re: [HACKERS] PG_SUBVERSION Bruce Momjian
• 23:59   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 HISTORY etc. Bruce Momjian

24 December 1998

• 00:08   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 HISTORY etc. Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:20   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 HISTORY etc. Bruce Momjian
• 12:06   Re: NULL & NOT NULL Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NULL & NOT NULL Tom Lane
• 13:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NULL & NOT NULL Bruce Momjian
• 18:00   Re: [HACKERS] Mhonarc for the docs list The Hermit Hacker
• 18:05   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 HISTORY etc. The Hermit Hacker
• 18:13   [URGENT] v6.4.1 was a mis-package... The Hermit Hacker
• 18:37   Re: [HACKERS] [URGENT] v6.4.1 was a mis-package... Sascha Schumann
• 19:17   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 HISTORY etc. Bruce Momjian
• 23:13   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 HISTORY etc. The Hermit Hacker

25 December 1998

• 00:18   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 HISTORY etc. Bruce Momjian
• 00:19   Re: [HACKERS] [URGENT] v6.4.1 was a mis-package... Bruce Momjian
• 00:32   Release of 6.4.1 Bruce Momjian
• 01:03   6.4.1 and web page Bruce Momjian
• 02:02   RE: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:07   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Bruce Momjian
• 03:39   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Vadim Mikheev
• 04:07   RE: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:06   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Vadim Mikheev
• 06:39   postgresql-6.4.1.tar.gz Edmund Mergl
• 08:32   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Vadim Mikheev
• 09:30   Re: [HACKERS] postgresql-6.4.1.tar.gz Bruce Momjian
• 09:30   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Bruce Momjian

26 December 1998

• 13:14   NetBSD/m68k port Tatsuo Ishii
• 16:16   Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/m68k port Bruce Momjian
• 16:25   psql \d does not work Angelos Karageorgiou
• 17:31   Re: [HACKERS] psql \d does not work Bruce Momjian
• 17:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/m68k port Hal Snyder
• 18:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/m68k port Bruce Momjian

27 December 1998

• 04:30   space usage of NULL fields Jan Vicherek
• 08:55   Re: [HACKERS] psql \d does not work Angelos Karageorgiou
• 09:03   pg_hba.conf Angelos Karageorgiou
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] space usage of NULL fields Bruce Momjian
• 15:18   regression test: triggers fial: Terry Mackintosh
• 16:29   int8 type substitute ? Jan Vicherek
• 16:35   Re: int8 type substitute ? Jan Vicherek
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] psql \d does not work Bruce Momjian
• 17:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 type substitute ? Bruce Momjian
• 19:21   Web site mirroring trouble Oleg Bartunov

28 December 1998

• 06:45   Re: [HACKERS] psql \d does not work Angelos Karageorgiou
• 07:28   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 12:06   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Theo Kramer
• 13:40   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NULL & NOT NULL Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:57   Re: [HACKERS] pg_hba.conf Tom Lane
• 14:02   Re: [HACKERS] postgresql-6.4.1.tar.gz Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:18   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NULL & NOT NULL Vince Vielhaber
• 14:22   Re: [HACKERS] postgresql-6.4.1.tar.gz Constantin Teodorescu
• 15:02   Re: [HACKERS] Mhonarc for the docs list Peter T Mount
• 16:26   Database access Shiby Thomas
• 18:18   Re: [CORE] Re: [HACKERS] postgresql-6.4.1.tar.gz Hal Snyder
• 23:07   Re: [GENERAL] Release of 6.4.1 Carl Riches

29 December 1998

• 01:10   sgml tag completion cleanup Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:59   Forgot how to set up cvsup Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:07   RE: Forgot how to set up cvsup John Polstra
• 06:41   Re: [HACKERS] bug(?) if int8 as primary key Michael Contzen
• 09:23   ... root@blik.samara.su (Samara CIT)
• 09:24   ... root@blik.samara.su (Samara CIT)
• 09:24   ... root@blik.samara.su (Samara CIT)
• 09:24   ... root@blik.samara.su (Samara CIT)
• 09:25   ... root@blik.samara.su (Samara CIT)
• 12:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NULL & NOT NULL Jose' Soares
• 13:03   Problem with create user in latest CVS Peter T Mount
• 13:08   Stale porting list? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:41   Re: [Fwd: postgresql-v6.4 - m88k svr4] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NULL & NOT NULL Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:03   Open for suggestions - IOW: HELP! Vince Vielhaber
• 15:24   Re: [HACKERS] Stale porting list? Tom Lane
• 15:32   bug with long serial names Nat Howard
• 16:01   Re: [HACKERS] bug with long serial names Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:12   Re: [GENERAL] Release of 6.4.1 (fwd) Carl Riches
• 16:14   Re: [PORTS] Stale porting list? Bruce Momjian
• 16:18   cvsup message Vince Vielhaber
• 16:18   Re: [GENERAL] Release of 6.4.1 (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 16:33   Re: [HACKERS] cvsup message The Hermit Hacker
• 16:34   Re: [HACKERS] bug with long serial names Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:42   Re: [HACKERS] cvsup message Thomas G. Lockhart
• 17:19   Re: [HACKERS] cvsup message Vince Vielhaber
• 17:43   RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] bug with long serial names PostgreSQL pseudo-user
• 17:50   certainly not a banner day Vince Vielhaber
• 18:00   Re: [HACKERS] MVCC works in serialized mode! Bruce Momjian
• 18:24   Re: [HACKERS] certainly not a banner day The Hermit Hacker
• 18:46   Re: [HACKERS] certainly not a banner day Vince Vielhaber
• 23:24   Re: Postgresql v6.4 on IRIX Thomas G. Lockhart

30 December 1998

• 01:16   NUMERIC needs OID's jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 03:31   Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC needs OID's Bruce Momjian
• 04:24   Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC needs OID's Thomas G. Lockhart
• 09:28   problems recovering 6.1 db Andrey V Khavryutchenko
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC needs OID's Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:10   Re: [HACKERS] problems recovering 6.1 db Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NULL & NOT NULL Jose' Soares
• 15:00   Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC needs OID's Bruce Momjian
• 18:13   NUMERIC stuff committed jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:52   psql: stdout or stderr? Terry Mackintosh
• 23:00   Re: [HACKERS] psql: stdout or stderr? Bruce Momjian

31 December 1998

• 03:37   Happy New Year! Vadim Mikheev
• 07:11   create rule Jose' Soares
• 09:21   Re: [HACKERS] problems recovering 6.1 db Andrey V Khavryutchenko
• 14:20   Re: [HACKERS] psql: stdout or stderr? Tom Lane
• 14:59   Date/time fixes for HAVE_TM_ZONE platforms Thomas G. Lockhart
• 18:27   Unused_oids Bruce Momjian
• 18:29   Re: [HACKERS] psql: stdout or stderr? Bruce Momjian
• 19:26   2 patches Goran Thyni
• 20:36   NAN value Bruce Momjian