Bruce Momjian wrote:
> [...]
> oids into that range, while we have never used oids over 1644. Just
> start at 1650 and head toward 16384. We have roughly 16200 unused
> system oids left.
I've just committed the NUMERIC stuff to the CURRENT tree.
Used OID's 1700-1767 up to now (some more will follow when
implementing the trigonometric functions).
Well folks - it's there now and can be stressed! Don't forget
to initdb.
I'll add a first precision check using some of the complex
math functions with scale 1000 to the regression soon.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
